CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2022; 31(01): 184-198
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742518
Section 6: Decision Support
Survey

Electronic Health Record-Integrated Clinical Decision Support for Clinicians Serving Populations Facing Health Care Disparities: Literature Review

Carole H. Stipelman
1   Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
2   Health Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Polina V. Kukhareva
3   Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Elly Trepman
4   Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
5   University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA
,
Quang-Tuyen Nguyen
1   Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Lourdes Valdez
3   Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Colleen Kenost
3   Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Maia Hightower
2   Health Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
3   Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
6   Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Kensaku Kawamoto
3   Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
› Author Affiliations

Summary

Objectives: To review current studies about designing and implementing clinician-facing clinical decision support (CDS) integrated or interoperable with an electronic health record (EHR) to improve health care for populations facing disparities.

Methods: We searched PubMed to identify studies published between January 1, 2011 and October 22, 2021 about clinician-facing CDS integrated or interoperable with an EHR. We screened abstracts and titles and extracted study data from articles using a protocol developed by team consensus. Extracted data included patient population characteristics, clinical specialty, setting, EHR, clinical problem, CDS type, reported user-centered design, implementation strategies, and outcomes.

Results: There were 28 studies (36 articles) included. Most studies were performed at safety net institutions (14 studies) or Indian Health Service sites (6 studies). CDS tools were implemented in primary care outpatient settings in 24 studies (86%) for screening or treatment. CDS included point-of-care alerts (93%), order facilitators (46%), workflow support (39%), relevant information display (36%), expert systems (11%), and medication dosing support (7%). Successful outcomes were reported in 19 of 26 studies that reported outcomes (73%). User-centered design was reported during CDS planning (39%), development (32%), and implementation phase (25%). Most frequent implementation strategies were education (89%) and consensus facilitation (50%).

Conclusions: CDS tools may improve health equity and outcomes for patients who face disparities. The present review underscores the need for high-quality analyses of CDS-associated health outcomes, reporting of user-centered design and implementation strategies used in low-resource settings, and methods to disseminate CDS created to improve health equity.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
04 December 2022

© 2022. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Whitehead M, Dahlgren G. Concepts and Principles for Tackling Social Inequities in Health: Levelling up Part 1. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2006.
  • 2 Braveman P. Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement. Annu Rev Public Health 2006;27:167-94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102103.
  • 3 Braveman P. What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep 2014 Jan-Feb;129(Suppl 2):5-8.
  • 4 Horton DJ, Graves KK, Kukhareva PV, Johnson SA, Cedillo M, Sanford M, et al. Modified early warning score-based clinical decision support: cost impact and clinical outcomes in sepsis. JAMIA Open 2020 Apr 21;3(2):261-8.
  • 5 Edholm K, Lappé K, Kukhareva P, Hopkins C, Hatton ND, Gebhart B, et al. Reducing Diabetic Ketoacidosis Intensive Care Unit Admissions Through an Electronic Health Record-Driven, Standardized Care Pathway. J Healthc Qual 2020 Sep/Oct;42(5):e66-e74.
  • 6 Katki HA, Kovalchik SA, Berg CD, Cheung LC, Chaturvedi AK. Development and Validation of Risk Models to Select Ever-Smokers for CT Lung Cancer Screening. JAMA 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2300-11.
  • 7 Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-53.
  • 8 Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS. Hidden in Plain Sight - Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms. N Engl J Med 2020 Aug 27;383(9):874-82.
  • 9 Feldman S, Ammar W, Lo K, Trepman E, van Zuylen M, Etzioni O. Quantifying Sex Bias in Clinical Studies at Scale With Automated Data Extraction. JAMA Netw Open 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196700.
  • 10 US Preventive Services Task Force; Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, et al. Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2211-8.
  • 11 Melnyk BM, Grossman DC, Chou R, Mabry-Hernandez I, Nicholson W, DeWitt TG, et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. USPSTF perspective on evidence-based preventive recommendations for children. Pediatrics 2012 Aug;130(2):e399-e407.
  • 12 Lewin ME, Altman S, editors. America’s Health Care Safety Net: Intact but Endangered. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
  • 13 Lewis VA, Spivack S, Murray GF, Rodriguez HP. FQHC Designation and Safety Net Patient Revenue Associated with Primary Care Practice Capabilities for Access and Quality. J Gen Intern Med 2021 Oct;36(10):2922-8.
  • 14 Panattoni L, Stults CD, Chan AS, Tai-Seale M. The human resource costs of implementing autopend clinical decision support to improve health maintenance. Am J Manag Care 2020 Jul 1;26(7):e232-e236.
  • 15 Kawamoto K, McDonald CJ. Designing, Conducting, and Reporting Clinical Decision Support Studies: Recommendations and Call to Action. Ann Intern Med 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S101-S109.
  • 16 Trinkley KE, Kroehl ME, Kahn MG, Allen LA, Bennett TD, Hale G, et al. Applying Clinical Decision Support Design Best Practices With the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model Versus Reliance on Commercially Available Clinical Decision Support Tools: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Med Inform 2021 Mar 22;9(3):e24359.
  • 17 Yapa HM, Bärnighausen T. Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities. Implement Sci 2018 Dec 27;13(1):154.
  • 18 Corsini L, Aranda-Jan CB, Henderson C, Moultrie J. Recommendations for participatory design in low-resource settings: a case study of Simprints. Academy for Design Innovation Management Conference, London, UK, June 19-21, 2019. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management 2019;951-61.
  • 19 Gold R, Hollombe C, Bunce A, Nelson C, Davis JV, Cowburn S, et al. Study protocol for “Study of Practices Enabling Implementation and Adaptation in the Safety Net (SPREAD-NET)”: a pragmatic trial comparing implementation strategies. Implement Sci 2015 Oct 16;10:144.
  • 20 NORC. Understanding the impact of health IT in underserved communities and those with health disparities. HealthIT.gov [Internet]. October 29, 2010. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/hit-underserved-communities-health-disparities.pdf [cited 2021 November 15].
  • 21 Singh K, Drouin K, Newmark LP, Filkins M, Silvers E, Bain PA, et al. Patient-Facing Mobile Apps to Treat High-Need, High-Cost Populations: A Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016 Dec 19;4(4):e136.
  • 22 Choi W, Wang S, Lee Y, Oh H, Zheng Z. A systematic review of mobile health technologies to support self-management of concurrent diabetes and hypertension. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020 Jun 1;27(6):939-45.
  • 23 Chattopadhyay D, Ma T, Sharifi H, Martyn-Nemeth P. Computer-Controlled Virtual Humans in Patient-Facing Systems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020 Jul 30;22(7):e18839.
  • 24 Wright A, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Feblowitz J, Meltzer S, McMullen C, et al. Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 May 1;18(3):232-42.
  • 25 Serving Vulnerable and Underserved Populations. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Web site. Available from: https://marketplace.cms.gov/technical-assistance-resources/training-materials/vulnerable-and-underserved-populations.pdf [cited 2022 March 28].
  • 26 Thiese MS. Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24(2):199-210.
  • 27 Bland JM. Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004 Aug 13;4:21.
  • 28 Kukhareva PV, Weir C, Del Fiol G, Aarons GA, Taft TY, Schlechter CR, et al. Evaluation in Life Cycle of Information Technology (ELICIT) framework: Supporting the innovation life cycle from business case assessment to summative evaluation. J Biomed Inform 2022 Mar;127:104014.
  • 29 Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci 2015 Feb 12;10:21.
  • 30 Shapiro A, Gracy D, Quinones W, Applebaum J, Sarmiento A. Putting guidelines into practice: improving documentation of pediatric asthma management using a decision-making tool. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011 May;165(5):412-8.
  • 31 Peiris D, Usherwood T, Panaretto K, Harris M, Hunt J, Patel B, et al. The Treatment of cardiovascular Risk in Primary care using Electronic Decision supOrt (TORPEDO) study-intervention development and protocol for a cluster randomised, controlled trial of an electronic decision support and quality improvement intervention in Australian primary healthcare. BMJ Open 2012 Nov 19;2(6):e002177.
  • 32 Peiris D, Usherwood T, Panaretto K, Harris M, Hunt J, Redfern J, et al. Effect of a computer-guided, quality improvement program for cardiovascular disease risk management in primary health care: the treatment of cardiovascular risk using electronic decision support cluster-randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015 Jan;8(1):87-95. Erratum in: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2018 Sep;11(9):e000049.
  • 33 Rudd S, Gemelas J, Reilley B, Leston J, Tulloch S. Integrating clinical decision support to increase HIV and chlamydia screening. Prev Med 2013 Dec;57(6):908-9.
  • 34 Onders R, Spillane J, Reilley B, Leston J. Use of electronic clinical reminders to increase preventive screenings in a primary care setting: blueprint from a successful process in Kodiak, Alaska. J Prim Care Community Health 2014 Jan 1;5(1):50-4.
  • 35 Hills RL, Kulbok PA, Clark M. Evaluating a Quality Improvement Program for Cervical Cancer Screening at an Urban Safety Net Clinic. Health Promot Pract 2015 Sep;16(5):631-41.
  • 36 Reilley B, Leston J, Tulloch S, Neel L, Galope M, Taylor M. Implementation of National HIV Screening Recommendations in the Indian Health Service. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 2015 Jul-Aug;14(4):291-4.
  • 37 Tuot DS, Velasquez A, McCulloch CE, Banerjee T, Zhu Y, Hsu CY, et al. The Kidney Awareness Registry and Education (KARE) study: protocol of a randomized controlled trial to enhance provider and patient engagement with chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol 2015 Oct 22;16:166.
  • 38 Strait A, Velasquez A, Handley MA, Leong K, Najmabadi A, Powe NR, et al. Acceptability of a multilevel intervention to improve blood pressure control among patients with chronic kidney disease in a public health care delivery system. Clin Kidney J 2018 Aug;11(4):540-8.
  • 39 Tuot DS, Rubinsky AD, Velasquez A, McCulloch CE, Schillinger D, Handley MA, et al. Interventions to Improve Blood Pressure Control Among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients With CKD: Kidney Awareness Registry and Education Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Kidney Med 2019 Aug 30;1(5):242-52.
  • 40 Joseph DA, Redwood D, DeGroff A, Butler EL. Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening. MMWR Suppl 2016 Feb 12;65(1):21-8.
  • 41 McGuire R, Moore E. Using a configurable EMR and decision support tools to promote process integration for routine HIV screening in the emergency department. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 Mar;23(2):396-401.
  • 42 Mera J, Vellozzi C, Hariri S, Carabin H, Drevets DA, Miller A, et al. Identification and Clinical Management of Persons with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection - Cherokee Nation, 2012-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016 May 13;65(18):461-6.
  • 43 Obeng AO, Kaszemacher T, Abul-Husn NS, Gottesman O, Vega A, Waite E, et al. Implementing Algorithm-Guided Warfarin Dosing in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population Using Electronic Health Records and Preemptive CYP2C9 and VKORC1 Genetic Testing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2016 Nov;100(5):427-30.
  • 44 Bachhuber MA, O’Grady MA, Chung H, Neighbors CJ, DeLuca J, D’Aloia EM, et al. Delivery of screening and brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use in an urban academic Federally Qualified Health Center. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2017 Dec 7;12(1):33.
  • 45 Gold R, Cottrell E, Bunce A, Middendorf M, Hollombe C, Cowburn S, et al. Developing Electronic Health Record (EHR) Strategies Related to Health Center Patients’ Social Determinants of Health. J Am Board Fam Med 2017 Jul-Aug;30(4):428-47.
  • 46 Gold R, Bunce A, Cowburn S, Dambrun K, Dearing M, Middendorf M, et al. Adoption of Social Determinants of Health EHR Tools by Community Health Centers. Ann Fam Med 2018 Sep;16(5):399-407.
  • 47 Gold R, Bunce A, Cottrell E, Marino M, Middendorf M, Cowburn S, et al. Study protocol: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge trial of tailored support for implementing social determinants of health documentation/action in community health centers, with realist evaluation. Implement Sci 2019 Jan 28;14(1):9.
  • 48 Gold R, Sheppler C, Hessler D, Bunce A, Cottrell E, Yosuf N, et al. Using Electronic Health Record-Based Clinical Decision Support to Provide Social Risk-Informed Care in Community Health Centers: Protocol for the Design and Assessment of a Clinical Decision Support Tool. JMIR Res Protoc 2021 Oct 8;10(10):e31733.
  • 49 Rosenman MB, Decker B, Levy KD, Holmes AM, Pratt VM, Eadon MT. Lessons Learned When Introducing Pharmacogenomic Panel Testing into Clinical Practice. Value Health 2017 Jan;20(1):54-9.
  • 50 Goleman MJ, Dolce M, Morack J. Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation at 9 Years of Age. Acad Pediatr 2018 Sep-Oct;18(7):769-75.
  • 51 Lara CL, Means KL, Morwood KD, Lighthall WR, Hoover S, Tangka FKL, et al. Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost-effectiveness. Cancer 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4130-6.
  • 52 Shaibi GQ, Kullo IJ, Singh DP, Sharp RR, De Filippis E, Cuellar I, et al. Developing a Process for Returning Medically Actionable Genomic Variants to Latino Patients in a Federally Qualified Health Center. Public Health Genomics 2018;21(1-2):77-84.
  • 53 Price-Haywood EG, Robinson W, Harden-Barrios J, Burton J, Burstain T. Intelligent Clinical Decision Support to Improve Safe Opioid Management of Chronic Noncancer Pain in Primary Care. Ochsner J 2018 Spring;18(1):30-5.
  • 54 Price-Haywood EG, Burton J, Burstain T, Harden-Barrios J, Lefante J, Shi L, et al. Clinical Effectiveness of Decision Support for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study. Value Health 2020 Feb;23(2):157-63.
  • 55 Jain MK, Rich NE, Ahn C, Turner BJ, Sanders JM, Adamson B, et al. Evaluation of a Multifaceted Intervention to Reduce Health Disparities in Hepatitis C Screening: A Pre-Post Analysis. Hepatology 2019 Jul;70(1):40-50.
  • 56 Orenstein EW, Yun K, Warden C, Westerhaus MJ, Mirth MG, Karavite D, et al. Development and dissemination of clinical decision support across institutions: standardization and sharing of refugee health screening modules. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1515-24.
  • 57 Shah SD, Prine L, Waltermaurer E, Rubin SE. Feasibility study of family planning services screening as clinical decision support at an urban Federally Qualified Health Center network. Contraception 2019 Jan;99(1):27-31.
  • 58 Srinivasulu S, Shah SD, Schechter CB, Prine L, Rubin SE. Effectiveness of clinical decision support to enhance delivery of family planning services in primary care settings. Contraception 2020 Mar;101(3):199-204.
  • 59 DeSilva MB, Kodet A, Walker PF. A Best Practice Alert for Identifying Hepatitis B-Infected Patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020 Aug;103(2):884-6.
  • 60 Herbst N, Wiener RS, Helm ED, O'Donnell C, Fitzgerald C, Wong C, et al. Effectiveness of an Opt-Out Electronic Heath Record-Based Tobacco Treatment Consult Service at an Urban Safety Net Hospital. Chest 2020 Oct;158(4):1734-41.
  • 61 Patel SA, Sharma H, Mohan S, Weber MB, Jindal D, Jarhyan P, et al. The Integrated Tracking, Referral, and Electronic Decision Support, and Care Coordination (I-TREC) program: scalable strategies for the management of hypertension and diabetes within the government healthcare system of India. BMC Health Serv Res 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1022.
  • 62 Rogers KA, Wilson AA, Wyckoff MA, Siatkowski RM. Computer-Based Quality Improvement for Management of Functionally Monocular Patients. Ophthalmology 2020 Jan;127(1):138-9.
  • 63 Campbell NL, Holden RJ, Tang Q, Boustani MA, Teal E, Hillstrom J, et al. Multicomponent behavioral intervention to reduce exposure to anticholinergics in primary care older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021 Jun;69(6):1490-9.
  • 64 Hughes MS, Apostolou A, Reilley B, Leston J, McCollum J, Iralu J. Electronic Health Record Reminders for Chlamydia Screening in an American Indian Population. Public Health Rep 2021 May;136(3):320-6.
  • 65 Petitgout JM, Werner J, Stewart S. Pediatric Complexity Tool Best Practice Alert: Early Identification of Care Coordination for Children with Special Health Care Needs. J Pediatr Health Care 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):485-90.
  • 66 Van de Velde S, Kunnamo I, Roshanov P, Kortteisto T, Aertgeerts B, Vandvik PO, et al; GUIDES expert panel. The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support. Implement Sci 2018 Jun 25;13(1):86.
  • 67 Trinkley KE, Kahn MG, Bennett TD, Glasgow RE, Haugen H, Kao DP, et al. Integrating the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model With Best Practices in Clinical Decision Support Design: Implementation Science Approach. J Med Internet Res 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e19676.
  • 68 Sirajuddin AM, Osheroff JA, Sittig DF, Chuo J, Velasco F, Collins DA. Implementation pearls from a new guidebook on improving medication use and outcomes with clinical decision support. Effective CDS is essential for addressing healthcare performance improvement imperatives. J Healthc Inf Manag 2009 Fall;23(4):38-45.
  • 69 Coronado GD, Schneider JL, Petrik A, Rivelli J, Taplin S, Green BB. Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders. Transl Behav Med 2017 Sep;7(3):557-66.
  • 70 Coronado GD, Retecki S, Schneider J, Taplin SH, Burdick T, Green BB. Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC. Clin Trials 2016 Apr;13(2):214-22.
  • 71 About VistA. WorldVistA.org [Internet]. Available from: https://worldvista.org/AboutVistA [cited 2021 November 19].
  • 72 Other VistA Adopters. WorldVistA.org [Internet]. Available from: https://worldvista.org/AboutVistA/copy_of_index_html [cited 2021 November 19].
  • 73 Kruse GR, Hays H, Orav EJ, Palan M, Sequist TD. Meaningful Use of the Indian Health Service Electronic Health Record. Health Serv Res 2017 Aug;52(4):1349-63.
  • 74 Indian Health Service Health IT Modernization Project. Strategic Options for the Modernization of the Indian Health Service Electronic Health Record. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services [Internet]. June 6, 2019. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ihs-health-it-mod-analysis-of-alternatives.pdf [cited 2021 November 19].
  • 75 OCHIN. National impact: nationwide reach. OCHIN [Internet]. Available from: https://ochin.org/national-impact. [cited 2021 November 19].
  • 76 Cottrell EK, Dambrun K, Cowburn S, Mossman N, Bunce AE, Marino M, et al. Variation in Electronic Health Record Documentation of Social Determinants of Health Across a National Network of Community Health Centers. Am J Prev Med 2019 Dec;57(6 Suppl 1):S65-S73.
  • 77 Raths D. New funding makes OCHIN largest health center controlled network. Healthcare Innovation [Internet]. July 29, 2019. Available from: https://www.hcinnovationgroup.com/clinical-it/electronic-health-record-electronic-medical-record-ehr-emr/news/21090392/new-funding-makes-ochin-largest-health-center-controlled-network [cited 2021 November 19].
  • 78 Devoe JE, Sears A. The OCHIN community information network: bringing together community health centers, information technology, and data to support a patient-centered medical village. J Am Board Fam Med 2013 May-Jun;26(3):271-8.
  • 79 OCHIN. OCHIN hosted Epic electronic health record. OCHIN [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ade0eb85cfd79247926399a/t/5d9b939522e5867cf037471d/1570476949935/Hosted+Epic+EHR+Two-Pager+190531.pdf [cited 2021 November 19].
  • 80 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Welcome to CDS Connect. AHRQ Web site. Available from: https://cds.ahrq.gov/cdsconnect [cited 2021 November 19].
  • 81 Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M, Michel JJ, Miller K. To Share is Human! Advancing Evidence into Practice through a National Repository of Interoperable Clinical Decision Support. Appl Clin Inform 2020 Jan;11(1):112-21.
  • 82 Orenstein E, Warden C, Yun K, Westerhaus M, Mamo B, Mirth M, et al. Refugee health decision support. AHRQ Web site. November 1, 2017. Available from: https://cds.ahrq.gov/cdsconnect/artifact/refugee-health-decision-support [cited 2022 April 21].
  • 83 Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow NA, editors. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1996.
  • 84 Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005;83(3):457-502.