RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742623
Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release in Leprosy Neuritis of the Ulnar Nerve
Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
Abstract
Objectives To better characterize the role of endoscopic cubital tunnel release in leprosy neuritis and determine whether there is an improvement in pain, sensitivity, and strength with the use of this minimally invasive technique.
Methods A total of 44 endoscopic procedures for ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow were performed in patients who were previously diagnosed with leprosy neuritis. The inclusion criteria were surgical indication for ulnar nerve release and clinical treatment failure for 4 weeks in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who had their ulnar nerve function, whether motor or sensitive, deteriorated progressively despite the treatment with prednisone 1 mg/kg/day and physiotherapy. For endoscopic release, the CTS Relief Kit (Linvatec. Largo, FL, USA) and a standard 4mm 30° arthroscope were used.
Results The study included 39 patients, 29 (74.4%) males and 10 (25.6%) females. The age of the patients ranged from 12 to 64 years (33 ± 14.97). Five patients underwent bilateral release. The release demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in pain (p 0.002), in sensitivity (p < 0.001), and in strength (p < 0.001). The best results were obtained when ulnar release was performed less than 6 months after surgery indication. None of the procedures were converted from endoscopic to open. No major complications (infection, vascular injury, and nervous injury) were reported. One patient had ulnar nerve subluxation.
Conclusion The endoscopic release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow in leprosy neuritis entails true and safe benefits for the patient, such as improvement in pain, sensitivity and strength.
Financial Support
There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.
Work developed at the National Reference Center in Dermatology, Sanitaria Dona Libânia, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 04. Juni 2021
Angenommen: 22. November 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Februar 2022
© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1 Jambeiro JES, Matos MAA, Sant'ana FR, Leite AA, Barbosa A, Jambeiro JF. Neurolise externa do ulnar: Apresentacao de tecnica ambulatorial. Rev Bras Ortop 1997; 32 (03) 236-238
- 2 Naafs B. Leprosy reactions. New knowledge. Trop Geogr Med 1994; 46 (02) 80-84
- 3 Nobre ML, Illarramendi X, Dupnik KM. et al. Multibacillary leprosy by population groups in Brazil: Lessons from an observational study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017; 11 (02) e0005364
- 4 Payne R, Baccon J, Dossett J. et al. Pure neuritic leprosy presenting as ulnar nerve neuropathy: a case report of electrodiagnostic, radiographic, and histopathological findings. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (05) 1238-1243
- 5 Wellington T, Schofield C. Late-onset ulnar neuritis following treatment of lepromatous leprosy infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019; 13 (08) e0007684
- 6 Rao PN, Jain S. Newer management options in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol 2013; 58 (01) 6-11
- 7 Crichton N. Visual analogue scale (VAS). J Clin Nurs 2001; 10 (697) 706
- 8 Widasmara D, Panjarwanto DA, Sananta P. The Correlation of Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test with the Level of P-75 Neurotrophin as Marker of Nerve Damage in Leprosy. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2020; 13: 399-404
- 9 Bell-Krotoski JA, Buford Jr WL. The force/time relationship of clinically used sensory testing instruments. J Hand Ther 1997; 10 (04) 297-309
- 10 Paternostro-Sluga T, Grim-Stieger M, Posch M. et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40 (08) 665-671
- 11 Agee JM, McCarroll Jr HR, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA. Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (06) 987-995
- 12 Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Kelm J, Reith W, Schwerdtfeger K, Steudel WI. Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30 (05) 521-524
- 13 Chow JC. Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 1989; 5 (01) 19-24
- 14 Tsai TM, Bonczar M, Tsuruta T, Syed SA. A new operative technique: cubital tunnel decompression with endoscopic assistance. Hand Clin 1995; 11 (01) 71-80
- 15 Bain GI, Bajhau A. Endoscopic release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow using the Agee device: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (06) 691-695
- 16 Toirac A, Giugale JM, Fowler JR. Open Versus Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel In Situ Decompression: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (03) 229-235
- 17 Pondé JM, Ramos C, Santos L, Magalhaes JP, Cavalcanti AF. Minimally invasive carpal tunnel surgery in leprosy. Arq Bras Neurocir Braz Neurosurg 2014; 33 (01) 42-44
- 18 Estrela Neto J, Leite JAD, Bezerra MJC. Estudo da secção do ligamento carpal transverso comparando as técnicas endoscópica e convencional em cadáver humano. Acta Cir Bras 2003; 18 (02) 116-123
- 19 Van Veen NH, Schreuders TA, Theuvenet WJ, Agrawal A, Richardus JH. Decompressive surgery for treating nerve damage in leprosy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12: CD006983
- 20 Virmond M, Marciano L, Almeida SN. Resultados de neurolise de nervo ulnar em neurite hansênica. Hansenol Int 1994; 19 (01) 5-9
- 21 Husain S, Mishra B, Prakash V, Malaviya GN. Results of surgical decompression of ulnar nerve in leprosy. Acta Leprol 1998; 11 (01) 17-20
- 22 Buchanan PJ, Chieng LO, Hubbard ZS, Law TY, Chim H. Endoscopic versus Open In Situ Cubital Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of 655 Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (03) 679-684
- 23 Cobb TK, Sterbank PT, Lemke JH. Endoscopic cubital tunnel recurrence rates. Hand (N Y) 2010; 5 (02) 179-183
- 24 Gómez JEG, Guillén JFA, Miñón-Ferrán MR, Grau JA, Juliá FJC, Carrasco MAS. Liberación endoscópica del túnel cubital. Técnica quirúrgica y resultados preliminares. Arch Med Dep 2013; 30 (06) 354-358
- 25 Carratalá V, Lucas F, Alepuz E, Calero R. Descompresión endoscópica del túnel cubital, técnica y experiencia. Rev Iberoam Cir Mano 2014; 42 (01) 9-17
- 26 Solís-Villarruel O, Sánchez-Gutiérrez LE. Liberación endoscópica del túnel cubital. Técnica y resultados clínico-funcionales. Acta Ortop Mex 2019; 33 (05) 303-307