Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742925
Risk of Atrioventricular Block following Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Computed Tomographic Analysis of Baseline Characteristics
Background: Postoperative complete atrioventricular block (AVB) is a frequent complication following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We aimed to determine the impact of anatomical variables and calcium load—assessed by preoperative multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan—to predict this outcome.
Method: From 2017 up to December 31, 2019, a preoperative MDCT was performed in patients affected by aortic valve stenosis for planning minimally invasive SAVR. Exclusion criteria were prior pacemaker implantation, endocarditis, prior valve interventions. Calcium load was calculated via 3mensio (Medical Imaging BV, the Netherlands). The study population was divided into two groups (AVB, non-AVB); baseline (clinical, echocardiogram, ECGs) and intraoperative characteristics were tested for normal distribution and compared with a no-parametric test (Mann–Whitney U-test) or Chi-square.
Results: A total of 155 (38% female) patients were included. Mean age was 71.2 ± 6 years, mean EuroSCORE II 2.8% ± 3. A total of 56 patients (36%) received a sutureless, while the rest a conventional bioprosthesis. A ministernotomy was performed in 109 patients (70%). A postoperative AVB was observed in 11 patients (7.1%), with higher but not significant prevalence in those who received a sutureless SAVR (10 vs. 5%; p = 0.2). The two groups were similar concerning mean age (non-AVB = 71.2 ± 6 vs. AVB = 70.9 ± 9 years; p = 0.8), EuroSCORE II (non-AVB = 2.8% ± 3 vs. AVB = 2.5% ± 1; p = 0.5), incidence of bicuspid valve (non-AVB = 31% vs. AVB = 27%; p = 0.8), CT-measured annulus area (non-AVB = 5 ± 1 vs. AVB = 5.4 ± 1 cm2; p = 0.3) and CT-measured membranous septum length (non-AVB = 12.6 ± 3 vs. AVB = 13.1 ± 2 mm; p = 0.6). Slight, but not significant differences were detected in LVEF (non-AVB = 57% ± 10 vs. AVB = 53.5% ± 12; p = 0.3) and right bundle branch block (non-AVB = 9% vs. AVB = 18%; p = 0.28). Calcium load and distribution differed significantly between groups, especially in the LVOT (see [Table]).
Non-AVB |
AVB |
p-Value |
|
---|---|---|---|
Total AV calcium (mm3) |
891.1 ± 624 |
1,239.0 ± 905 |
0.190 |
LCC calcium (mm3) AV |
229.1 ± 193 |
386.2 ± 263 |
0.044 |
RCC calcium (mm3) AV |
280.3 ± 263 |
432.8 ± 370 |
0.123 |
NCC calcium (mm3) AV |
369.2 ± 291 |
419.1 ± 374 |
0.661 |
Total calcium LVOT (mm3) |
66.0 ± 121 |
122.5 ± 130 |
0.02 |
LCC calcium LVOT (mm3) |
33.5 ± 82 |
58.1 ± 62 |
0.048 |
RCC calcium LVOT (mm3) |
6.2 ± 15 |
36.8 ± 89 |
0.039 |
NCC calcium LVOT (mm3) |
26.3 ± 67 |
27.7 ± 26 |
0.116 |
Conclusion: Calcium load—as assessed by preoperative MDCT—was significantly higher in patients who developed a complete AVB following SAVR and thus is helpful in identifying patients at risk.
Publication History
Article published online:
03 February 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany