Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(04): 719-728
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743144
Review Article

Influence of Instrument Lubrication on Properties of Dental Composites

Juliusz Kosewski
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
,
Przemysław Kosewski
2   Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
,
Agnieszka Mielczarek 
3   Department of Conservative Dentistry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Resin composites are one of the most commonly used materials in restorative dentistry. To improve their handling and facilitate restoration sculpting, clinicians began to lubricate modeling instruments with various substances like alcohol, unfilled resins, or even bonding agents. Although the technique is commonly present in daily clinical practice, it has not been precisely described in the literature and both application methods and lubricating materials vary across the available studies. This study aims to summarize the currently available knowledge about influence of instrument lubrication on properties of dental composites. Literature selection was conducted within MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EBSCO databases. Instrument lubrication seems not to be indifferent for composite mechanical and optical properties. Moreover, various lubricants can differently affect the composite material, so the choice of lubricating agent should be deliberate and cautious. Available in vitro studies suggest possible incorporation of lubricant into the composite structure. Unfilled resins based on bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) seem to be the best choice for the lubricant, as bonding agents containing hydrophilic molecules and alcohols carry a bigger risk of altering the composite properties. Further research is necessary to evaluate lubricants' influence in clinical practice conditions.

Keywords

composite modeling - composite resin - dental adhesive - instrument lubricant - modeling resin


Publication History

Article published online:
08 April 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Lynch CD, Opdam NJ, Hickel R. et al; Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section. J Dent 2014; 42 (04) 377-383
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Pfeifer CS. Polymer-based direct filling materials. Dent Clin North Am 2017; 61 (04) 733-750
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Opdam NJM, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E. et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014; 93 (10) 943-949
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Vanini L. Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996; 8 (07) 673-682 , quiz 684
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Dulik D, Bernier R, Brauer GM. Effect of diluent monomer on the physical properties of bis-GMA-based composites. J Dent Res 1981; 60 (06) 983-989
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Al-Sharaa KA, Watts DC. Stickiness prior to setting of some light cured resin-composites. Dent Mater 2003; 19 (03) 182-187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ritter AV, Boushell LW, Walter R. Clinical technique for direct composite resin and glass ionomer restorations. In: Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2018: 219-263
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Pagniano RP, Johnston WM. The effect of unfilled resin dilution on composite resin hardness and abrasion resistance. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70 (03) 214-218
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Ellakwa A, Cho N, Lee IB. The effect of resin matrix composition on the polymerization shrinkage and rheological properties of experimental dental composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23 (10) 1229-1235
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lee J-H, Um C-M, Lee IB. Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in monomer and filler composition. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (06) 515-526
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Liebenberg WH. Bonding agent as an instrument lubricant: potential effect on marginal integrity. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999; 11 (04) 475-476 , 478
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Dunn WJ, Strong TC. Effect of alcohol and unfilled resin in the incremental buildup of resin composite. Quintessence Int 2007; 38 (01) e20-e26
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Perdigăo J, Gomes G. Effect of instrument lubricant on the cohesive strength of a hybrid resin composite. Quintessence Int 2006; 37 (08) 621-625
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Patel J, Granger C, Parker S, Patel M. The effect of instrument lubricant on the diametral tensile strength and water uptake of posterior composite restorative material. J Dent 2017; 56: 33-38
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Tjan AH, Glancy JF. Effects of four lubricants used during incremental insertion of two types of visible light-activated composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60 (02) 189-194
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Barcellos DC, Pucci CR, Torres CR, Goto EH, Inocencio AC. Effects of resinous monomers used in restorative dental modeling on the cohesive strength of composite resin. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10 (05) 351-354
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Barcellos DC, Palazon M, Pucci CR, Torres CRG, De Paiva Gonçalves SE. Effects of self-etching adhesive systems used in the dental modelling technique on the cohesive strength of composite resin. J Adhes 2011; 87 (02) 154-161
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Melo AM, Santos T, Tertulino M, Medeiros M, Oliveira da silva A, Borges B. Degree of conversion, translucency and intrinsic color stability of composites during surface modeling with lubricants. Braz J Oral Sci 2018; 17: 1-11
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kutuk ZB, Erden E, Aksahin DL, Durak ZE, Dulda AC. Influence of modeling agents on the surface properties of an esthetic nano-hybrid composite. Restor Dent Endod 2020; 45 (02) e13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Unlü N, Uysal Ö. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25 (06) 404-419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 de Paula FC, Valentin RdeS, Borges BC, Medeiros MC, de Oliveira RF, da Silva AO. Effect of instrument lubricants on the surface degree of conversion and crosslinking density of nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28 (02) 85-91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Araujo FS, Barros MCR, Santana MLC. et al. Effects of adhesive used as modeling liquid on the stability of the color and opacity of composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30 (05) 427-433
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Brondani LP, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Effects of modeling liquid/resin and polishing on the color change of resin composite. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30 (01) S1806 -83242016000100275
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Translucency and color stability of resin composite and dental adhesives as modeling liquids - a one-year evaluation. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31: e54
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Münchow EA, Sedrez-Porto JA, Piva E, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Use of dental adhesives as modeler liquid of resin composites. Dent Mater 2016; 32 (04) 570-577
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Al-Towairqi WA, Hamouda IM. Effect of instrument lubricant on water sorption and solubility of incrementally applied nanofilled resin composite. J Nanotechnol Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2017; 4 (03) 1-4
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Bayraktar ET, Atali PY, Korkut B, Kesimli EG, Tarcin B, Turkmen C. Effect of modeling resins on microhardness of resin composites. Eur J Dent 2021; 15 (03) 481-487
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Asmussen E. Softening of BISGMA-based polymers by ethanol and by organic acids of plaque. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 92 (03) 257-261
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Malacarne-Zanon J, Pashley DH, Agee KA. et al. Effects of ethanol addition on the water sorption/solubility and percent conversion of comonomers in model dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2009; 25 (10) 1275-1284
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Cadenaro M, Breschi L, Antoniolli F. et al. Degree of conversion of resin blends in relation to ethanol content and hydrophilicity. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (09) 1194-1200
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Dursun E, Fron-Chabouis H, Attal J-P, Raskin A, Bisphenol A. Bisphenol A release: survey of the composition of dental composite resins. Open Dent J 2016; 10: 446-453
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ruyter IE. Composites–characterization of composite filling materials: reactor response. Adv Dent Res 1988; 2 (01) 122-129 , discussion 129–133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Asmussen E. Composite restorative resins: composition versus wall-to-wall polymerization contraction. Acta Odontol Scand 1975; 33 (06) 337-344
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105 (02) 97-116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Chung KH. The relationship between composition and properties of posterior resin composites. J Dent Res 1990; 69 (03) 852-856
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Ferracane JL. Resin composite–state of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27 (01) 29-38
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Masouras K, Silikas N, Watts DC. Correlation of filler content and elastic properties of resin-composites. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (07) 932-939
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Stansbury JW. Dimethacrylate network formation and polymer property evolution as determined by the selection of monomers and curing conditions. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (01) 13-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Vanini L. Conservative composite restorations that mimic nature. The Journal of Cosmetic Dentistry 2010; 26 (03) 80-98
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 40 Chandrasekhar V, Rudrapati L, Badami V, Tummala M. Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20 (06) 386-391
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dent Mater 2009; 25 (11) 1338-1346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Tjan AHL, Glancy JF. Interfacial bond strengths between layers of visible light-activated composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59 (01) 25-29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Eliades GC, Caputo AA, Vougiouklakis GJ. Composition, wetting properties and bond strength with dentin of 6 new dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1985; 1 (05) 170-176
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Beltrami R, Ceci M, De Pani G. et al. Effect of different surface finishing/polishing procedures on color stability of esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (01) 49-56
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Cortopassi LS, Shimokawa CAK, Willers AE, Sobral MAP. Surface roughness and color stability of surface sealants and adhesive systems applied over a resin-based composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32 (01) 64-72
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Lovell LG, Lu H, Elliott JE, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. The effect of cure rate on the mechanical properties of dental resins. Dent Mater 2001; 17 (06) 504-511
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2009; 25 (11) 1411-1418
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Rastelli AN, Jacomassi DP, Faloni AP. et al. The filler content of the dental composite resins and their influence on different properties. Microsc Res Tech 2012; 75 (06) 758-765
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Gajewski VE, Pfeifer CS, Fróes-Salgado NR, Boaro LC, Braga RR. Monomers used in resin composites: degree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption/solubility. Braz Dent J 2012; 23 (05) 508-514
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Xu T, Li X, Wang H. et al. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and degree of conversion of resin composites. J Oral Sci 2020; 62 (03) 275-280
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2002; 23 (08) 1819-1829
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Putzeys E, Vercruyssen C, Duca RC. et al. Monomer release from direct and indirect adhesive restorations: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (10) 1275-1281
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Baldion PA, Velandia-Romero ML, Castellanos JE. Dental resin monomers induce early and potent oxidative damage on human odontoblast-like cells. Chem Biol Interact 2021; 333: 109336
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (03) 211-222
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63 (10) 1248-1254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Influence of water exposure on the tensile strength of composites. J Dent Res 1990; 69 (12) 1812-1816
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Fan PL, Edahl A, Leung RL, Stanford JW. Alternative interpretations of water sorption values of composite resins. J Dent Res 1985; 64 (01) 78-80
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003; 24 (04) 655-665
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Azzopardi N, Moharamzadeh K, Wood DJ, Martin N, van Noort R. Effect of resin matrix composition on the translucency of experimental dental composite resins. Dent Mater 2009; 25 (12) 1564-1568
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Lehtinen J, Laurila T, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Räty J, Hernberg R. Optical characterization of bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate-triethyleneglycoldimethacrylate (BisGMA/TEGDMA) monomers and copolymer. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (10) 1324-1328
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Manojlovic D, Dramićanin MD, Lezaja M, Pongprueksa P, Van Meerbeek B, Miletic V. Effect of resin and photoinitiator on color, translucency and color stability of conventional and low-shrinkage model composites. Dent Mater 2016; 32 (02) 183-191
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira Jr OB. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23 (02) 73-87
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Barutcigil Ç, Yıldız M. Intrinsic and extrinsic discoloration of dimethacrylate and silorane based composites. J Dent 2012; 40 (Suppl. 01) e57-e63
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Möller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987; 3 (05) 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Kanter J, Koski RE, Gough JE. Evaluation of insertion methods for composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41 (01) 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Sneed WD, Draughn RA. Effect of alcohol on the strength of a composite resin. Oper Dent 1980; 5 (02) 47-48
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Gonçalves F, Azevedo CLN, Ferracane JL, Braga RR. BisGMA/TEGDMA ratio and filler content effects on shrinkage stress. Dent Mater 2011; 27 (06) 520-526
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Pfeifer C, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117 (04) 442-446
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Collares FM, Ogliari FA, Zanchi CH, Petzhold CL, Piva E, Samuel SM. Influence of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate concentration on polymer network of adhesive resin. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13 (02) 125-129
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Comba A, Manzon E, Giuliano C. et al. Influence of surface coating sealer on resin composite water absorption and discoloration: an in vitro study. Am J Dent 2018; 31 (01) 24-28
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Tabatabaei MH, Nahavandi AM, Khorshidi S, Hashemikamangar SS. Fluorescence and opalescence of two dental composite resins. Eur J Dent 2019; 13 (04) 527-534
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar