Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Glob Med Genet 2022; 09(02): 097-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743569
Original Article

CD24+ MDSC-DCs Induced by CCL5-Deficiency Showed Improved Antitumor Activity as Tumor Vaccines

Lei Huang
1   State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji-Med-X Stem Cell Research Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
2   Med-X Research Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Zequn Ding
1   State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji-Med-X Stem Cell Research Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
2   Med-X Research Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
,
Yan Zhang
1   State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji-Med-X Stem Cell Research Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
2   Med-X Research Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
› Author Affiliations Funding This work was supported by funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773250 and 81972670 to Y.Z.).
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Dendritic cell (DC) tumor vaccine has been extensively utilized in preclinical and clinical studies; however, this technique has encountered many difficulties, particularly in late-stage tumor patients. For those, ex vivo-induced DCs are actuallymyeloid-derived suppressive cells-derived DCs (MDSC-DCs). MDSCs with immunosuppressive activity, but not monocytes, became the major DC precursor. Thus, how to enhance antitumor activity of MDSC-DCs is urgent need to address.

Methods We utilized 4T1 and MC38 tumor-bearing both wildtype and CC chemokine ligand 5−/− (CCL5−/−) mice as animal models. MDSC-DCs were induced from splenocytes of these mice by granulocyte macrophage–colony stimulating factor/interleukin-4 with or without all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) in vitro for 7 days, then incubated with tumor-cell-lysis to treat mouse models for total three doses. For human MDSC-DCs, peripheral bloods from colorectal cancer patients were induced in vitro as murine cells with or without T- lymphocytes depletion to get rid of CCL5.

Results Flow cytometry analysis showed that MDSCs from CCL5 −/− mice could be induced into a new type of CD24+ MDSC-DCs in the presence of ATRA, which had more antitumor activity than control. Antibody blocking and adoptive transfer experiments demonstrated that downregulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) mediated the inhibition of CD24+ MDSC-DCs on tumor growth. Mechanically, CD24+ MDSC-DCs inhibited Tregs' polarization by secreting cytokine or coactivators' expression. What's important, decreasing CCL5 protein levels by T- lymphocytes depletion during both murine and human MDSC-DCs in vitro induction could also acquire CD24+ MDSC-DCs.

Conclusion Knockdown of CCL5 protein during MDSC-DCs culture might provide a promising method to acquire DC-based tumor vaccines with high antitumor activity.

Keywords

CD24+ MDSC-DCs - CCL5-deficiency - tumor vaccines - antitumor activity - Tregs

Authors' Contributions

Y.Z. and L.H. were involved in conception and design and development of methodology. L.H., ZQ.Z., and Y.Z. helped in acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.). L.H., ZQ.D., W.-Q.G., and Y.Z. contributed substantially in analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis). L.H., ZQ.D., W.-Q.G., and Y.Z. were involved in writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript. Y.Z. was involved in administrative, technical, or material support. W.-Q. G. and Y.Z. supervised the study.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 22 December 2021

Accepted: 21 January 2022

Article published online:
08 March 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Bremer C. Molecular targets. Encycl Diagnostic Imaging 2008; 1154-1155
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 van Willigen WW, Bloemendal M, Gerritsen WR, Schreibelt G, de Vries IJM, Bol KF. Dendritic cell cancer therapy: vaccinating the right patient at the right time. Front Immunol 2018; 9 (OCT): 2265 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02265.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat Rev Immunol 2020; 20 (11) 651-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mildner A, Jung S. Development and function of dendritic cell subsets. Immunity 2014; 40 (05) 642-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Huber A, Dammeijer F, Aerts JGJV, Vroman H. Current state of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy: opportunities for in vitro antigen loading of different DC subsets?. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 2804 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02804.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mastelic-Gavillet B, Balint K, Boudousquie C, Gannon PO, Kandalaft LE. Personalized dendritic cell vaccines-recent breakthroughs and encouraging clinical results. Front Immunol 2019; 10 (APR): 766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND. et al; IMPACT Study Investigators. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (05) 411-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Anassi E, Ndefo UA. Sipuleucel-T (provenge) injection: the first immunotherapy agent (vaccine) for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. P&T 2011; 36 (04) 197-202
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Huber ML, Haynes L, Parker C, Iversen P. Interdisciplinary critique of sipuleucel-T as immunotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104 (04) 273-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Higano CS, Schellhammer PF, Small EJ. et al. Integrated data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 2009; 115 (16) 3670-3679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sabado RL, Balan S, Bhardwaj N. Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy. Cell Res 2017; 27 (01) 74-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Palucka AK, Ueno H, Connolly J. et al. Dendritic cells loaded with killed allogeneic melanoma cells can induce objective clinical responses and MART-1 specific CD8+ T-cell immunity. J Immunother 2006; 29 (05) 545-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Redman BG, Chang AE, Whitfield J. et al. Phase Ib trial assessing autologous, tumor-pulsed dendritic cells as a vaccine administered with or without IL-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Immunother 2008; 31 (06) 591-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hinshaw DC, Shevde LA. The tumor microenvironment innately modulates cancer progression. Cancer Res 2019; 79 (18) 4557-4566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nagarsheth N, Wicha MS, Zou W. Chemokines in the cancer microenvironment and their relevance in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 2017; 17 (09) 559-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Greten FR, Grivennikov SI. Inflammation and cancer: triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity 2019; 51 (01) 27-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jordan KR, Kapoor P, Spongberg E. et al. Immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells are increased in splenocytes from cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2017; 66 (04) 503-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Immunol Res 2017; 5 (01) 3-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Grover A, Sanseviero E, Timosenko E, Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: a propitious road to clinic. Cancer Discov 2021; 11 (11) 2693-2706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Aldinucci D, Borghese C, Casagrande N. The ccl5/ccr5 axis in cancer progression. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12 (07) 1-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zhang S, Zhong M, Wang C, Xu Y, Gao WQ, Zhang Y. CCL5-deficiency enhances intratumoral infiltration of CD8+ T cells in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis 2018; 9 (07) 766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zhang Y, Lv D, Kim HJ. et al. A novel role of hematopoietic CCL5 in promoting triple-negative mammary tumor progression by regulating generation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cell Res 2013; 23 (03) 394-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Younos I, Donkor M, Hoke T. et al. Tumor- and organ-dependent infiltration by myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Int Immunopharmacol 2011; 11 (07) 816-826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bronte V, Brandau S, Chen SH. et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 12150 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12150.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Perez CR, De Palma M. Engineering dendritic cell vaccines to improve cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun 2019; 10 (01) 5408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mirza N, Fishman M, Fricke I. et al. All-trans-retinoic acid improves differentiation of myeloid cells and immune response in cancer patients. Cancer Res 2006; 66 (18) 9299-9307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mueller BU, Pabst T, Fos J. et al. ATRA resolves the differentiation block in t(15;17) acute myeloid leukemia by restoring PU.1 expression. Blood 2006; 107 (08) 3330-3338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fang X, Zheng P, Tang J, Liu Y. CD24: from A to Z. Cell Mol Immunol 2010; 7 (02) 100-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Askew D, Harding CV. Antigen processing and CD24 expression determine antigen presentation by splenic CD4+ and CD8+ dendritic cells. Immunology 2008; 123 (03) 447-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Schlitzer A, McGovern N, Teo P. et al. IRF4 transcription factor-dependent CD11b+ dendritic cells in human and mouse control mucosal IL-17 cytokine responses. Immunity 2013; 38 (05) 970-983
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kim TS, Gorski SA, Hahn S, Murphy KM, Braciale TJ. Distinct dendritic cell subsets dictate the fate decision between effector and memory CD8(+) T cell differentiation by a CD24-dependent mechanism. Immunity 2014; 40 (03) 400-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Fridman WH, Pagès F, Sautès-Fridman C, Galon J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12 (04) 298-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zhang N, Bevan MJ. CD8(+) T cells: foot soldiers of the immune system. Immunity 2011; 35 (02) 161-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Togashi Y, Shitara K, Nishikawa H. Regulatory T cells in cancer immunosuppression - implications for anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019; 16 (06) 356-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Vignali DAA, Collison LW, Workman CJ. How regulatory T cells work. Nat Rev Immunol 2008; 8 (07) 523-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Chen ML, Pittet MJ, Gorelik L. et al. Regulatory T cells suppress tumor-specific CD8 T cell cytotoxicity through TGF-β signals in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (02) 419-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Setiady YY, Coccia JA, Park PU. In vivo depletion of CD4+FOXP3+ Treg cells by the PC61 anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody is mediated by FcgammaRIII+ phagocytes. Eur J Immunol 2010; 40 (03) 780-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Zhang Q, Qin J, Zhong L. et al. CCL5-mediated Th2 immune polarization promotes metastasis in luminal breast cancer. Cancer Res 2015; 75 (20) 4312-4321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Altevogt P, Sammar M, Hüser L, Kristiansen G. Novel insights into the function of CD24: a driving force in cancer. Int J Cancer 2021; 148 (03) 546-559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Barkal AA, Brewer RE, Markovic M. et al. CD24 signalling through macrophage Siglec-10 is a target for cancer immunotherapy. Nature 2019; 572 (7769): 392-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar