PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2023; 17(02): 342-348
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744369
Original Article

The Blending Effect of Single-Shade Composite with Different Shades of Conventional Resin Composites—An In Vitro Study

Md Sofiqul Islam 
1   Department of Operative Dentistry, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
,
Noorul Huda
2   Department of Clinical Dentistry, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
,
Sankavi Mahendran
2   Department of Clinical Dentistry, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
,
Smriti Aryal AC 
3   Department of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
,
Mohannad Nassar
4   Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
,
Mohammed Mustahsen Rahman
5   Department of Periodontology, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Single-shade composite systems are gaining popularity among clinicians due to the claimed potential of blending with different tooth structure shades while restoring the tooth. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the blending effect of two single-shade composite with different shades of conventional resin composite systems.

Materials and Methods Seventy-two composite cylinders of B1, B2, A1, A2, A3, or A3.5 shade from CharmFil Plus (CP) and Filtek Universal Restorative (3M) were prepared using custom-made silicone mold. Single-shade composite OMNICHROMA (OC) or Beautifil II Enamel (BE) was placed in the center of each cylinder and polymerized. The color parameters, lightness (L*), chroma (C*), and hue (H*) of each composite were measured using a color chronometer. Furthermore, color stability of the samples was evaluated after 1-week staining challenge.

Statistical Analysis Multivariant analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of material and shade on the color parameters. Multiple comparisons of the data were performed using post hoc test. The staining challenge data were analyzed using repeated measure analysis of variance and paired sample T-test.

Results The multivariant analysis showed a statistically significant difference in color parameters among CP, 3M, OC, and BE (p = 0.001). Image analysis showed a visual blending effect for both OC and BE for certain shades; however, some color contrast with the darker shades was observed. The C* value of OC showed a similar pattern to CP; however, the H* of the latter was closely followed by BE. The L* value showed statistically significant difference among the shades of 3M, and in OC and BE when blended with 3M.

Conclusion All four materials used in this study showed color alteration after the staining challenge. Single-shade composite can blend with only certain shades of resin composites.

Keywords

OMNICHROMA - blending effect - color stability - resin composite - single-shade composite - Beautifil II Enamel


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Juni 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Lavigueur C, Zhu XX. Recent advances in the development of dental composite resins. RSC Adv 2012; 2 (01) 59-63
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Aminoroaya A, Neisiany RE, Khorasani SN. et al. A review of dental composites: challenges, chemistry aspects, filler influences, and future insights. Compos Part B Eng 2021; 216: 108852
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lee Y-K. Translucency of human teeth and dental restorative materials and its clinical relevance. J Biomed Opt 2015; 20 (04) 045002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Alzraikat H, Burrow MF, Maghaireh GA, Taha NA. Nanofilled resin composite properties and clinical performance: a review. Oper Dent 2018; 43 (04) E173-E190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira Jr OB. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23 (02) 73-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ceci M, Viola M, Rattalino D, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Poggio C. Discoloration of different esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (02) 149-156
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kalantari MH, Ghoraishian SA, Mohaghegh M. Evaluation of accuracy of shade selection using two spectrophotometer systems: Vita Easyshade and Degudent Shadepilot. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (02) 196-200
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Yamaguchi S, Karaer O, Lee C, Sakai T, Imazato S. Color matching ability of resin composites incorporating supra-nano spherical filler producing structural color. Dent Mater 2021; 37 (05) e269-e275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bakti I, Santosa AS, Irawan B, Damiyanti M. Chameleon effect of nano-filled composite resin restorations in artificial acrylic teeth of various shades. J Phys: Conf Ser 2018; 1073: 52011
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Abdelraouf RM, Habib NA. Color-matching and blending-effect of universal shade bulk-fill-resin-composite in resin-composite-models and natural teeth. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 4183432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mourouzis P, Koulaouzidou EA, Palaghias G, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M. Color match of resin composites to intact tooth structure. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015; 13 (03) e259-e265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Difference in the colour and colour change of dental resin composites by the background. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32 (03) 227-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Durand LB, Ruiz-López J, Perez BG. et al. Color, lightness, chroma, hue, and translucency adjustment potential of resin composites using CIEDE2000 color difference formula. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33 (06) 836-843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Eliezer R, Devendra C, Ravi N, Tangutoori T, Yesh S. Omnichroma: one composite to rule them all. Int J Med Sci 2020; 7 (06) 6-8
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lowe RA. OMNICHROMA: one composite that covers all shades for an anterior tooth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2019; 40 (1, suppl 1): 8-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Auster P. Evolution and revolution: groundbreaking changes in composite dentistry. Dentistry Today 2019;38(02). Available at: https://www.dentistrytoday.com/restorative-134/105
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Gingiva and enamel shades for greater individuality. Br Dent J 2019; 227 (04) 323
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pereira Sanchez N, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31 (05) 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 dos Santos GB, Alto RVM, Filho HRS, da Silva EM, Fellows CE. Light transmission on dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (05) 571-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Watts DC, Cash AJ. Analysis of optical transmission by 400-500 nm visible light into aesthetic dental biomaterials. J Dent 1994; 22 (02) 112-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dumanli AG, Savin T. Recent advances in the biomimicry of structural colours. Chem Soc Rev 2016; 45 (24) 6698-6724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mohamed MA, Afutu R, Tran D. et al. Shade-matching capacity of Omnichroma in anterior restorations. Open Access J Dent Sci 2020;5(02):
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Peyton DJ. Show Your Work: Restoring Large Class III Cavities with a One-Shade Composite. Dentaltown (December 2019) 28–30. Available at: https://www.dentaltown.com/magazine/article/7843/s
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Iyer RS, Babani VR, Yaman P, Dennison J. Color match using instrumental and visual methods for single, group, and multi-shade composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33 (02) 394-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kolb C, Gumpert K, Wolter H, Sextl G. Highly translucent dental resin composites through refractive index adaption using zirconium dioxide nanoparticles and organic functionalization. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (10) 1332-1342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ota M, Ando S, Endo H, Ogura Y, Miyazaki M, Hosoya Y. Influence of refractive index on optical parameters of experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2012; 70 (05) 362-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Arai Y, Kurokawa H, Takamizawa T. et al. Evaluation of structural coloration of experimental flowable resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33 (02) 284-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Paravina RD, Westland S, Imai FH, Kimura M, Powers JM. Evaluation of blending effect of composites related to restoration size. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (04) 299-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Barakat O, Abbas M. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and color changes of resin composites: an in vitro study. Egypt Dent J 2019; 65 (01) 657-666
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yildiz E, Sirin Karaarslan E, Simsek M, Ozsevik AS, Usumez A. Color stability and surface roughness of polished anterior restorative materials. Dent Mater J 2015; 34 (05) 629-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Aydın N, Topçu FT, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Erdemir U. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Clin Exp Dent 2021; 13 (05) e446-e454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar