Survey of Areas Underserved by Plastic Surgery in Japan

Abstract

Background In Japan, there is a large regional disparity in plastic surgery availability. In order for plastic surgery to be widely available for all citizens, it is essential for at least one plastic surgery facility to be located in each secondary medical zone.

Methods Using the Japan Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery homepage and some databases, we extracted data on secondary medical zones that do not have a plastic surgery facility. The national and regional coverage rates were calculated. The coverage rate for each group divided by the degree of population concentration was also calculated.

Results We found that 147 of 344 secondary medical zones did not have a plastic surgery facility, and the area coverage rate was found to be 57.27% nationwide. The coverage rate in terms of population was 87.07% (correlation coefficient of area and population coverage = 0.983). The area coverage rates in Hokkaido-Tohoku, Kanto, Chubu, Kansai, Chugoku-Shikoku, and Kyushu-Okinawa districts were 47.46, 72.15, 76.47, 62.79, 52.08, and 32.81%, respectively. The corresponding population coverage rates were 79.92, 91.62, 94.27, 90.59, 80.68, and 69.54%, respectively. The area coverage rates in metropolitan areas, provincial cities, and rural areas were 98.08, 75.90, and 15.87%, respectively. In contrast, the area coverage rate of dermatology was 62.79% and that of orthopaedics was 97.09%.

Conclusion Unfortunately, it is estimated that more than 40% of secondary medical zones are underserved by plastic surgery, and 13% of the population is not able to fully benefit from this specialty in Japan.

Keywords

public health - health resources - community medicine - plastic surgery

Prior Presentation

This study was presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: International Session, August 26–28, 2020, Nagoya, Japan.

Publication History

Article published online:
06 April 2022

• References

• 1 Satoh E, Kumakawa T. Establishing medical care zone from residents perspectives: The accessibility of critical care in Kanagawa prefecture and Iwate prefecture as case studies. Hoken Iryou Kagaku 2013; 62: 46-51
• 2 Sato M. Regional disparity in plastic surgery availability in Japan: visualization of the permeation for residents. Jpn J Plast Surg 2019; 62: 539-546
• 3 The list of certified facilities by Japan Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Available at: https://jsprs.or.jp/specialist/shutoku/current_seido/nintei_shisetsu_list/index.html
• 4 Working Paper No. 443 of Japan Medical Association Research Institute. Available at: https://www.jmari.med.or.jp/research/working/wr_697.html
• 5 Japanese Dermatological Association's accredited training facilities (as of March 6, 2020). Available at: https://www.dermatol.or.jp/modules/specialist/index.php?content_id=25
• 6 Accredited facility's list of Japan Orthopedic Association. Accessed June 18, 2020 at: https://www.joa.or.jp/joaSecretariats/public-hp/facility-search
• 7 Miwa M, Kawaguchi H, Arima H, Kawahara K. The effect of the development of an emergency transfer system on the travel time to tertiary care centres in Japan. Int J Health Geogr 2006; 5: 25
• 8 Woodward A, Kawachi I. Why should physicians be concerned about health inequalities? Because inequalities are unfair and hurt everyone. West J Med 2001; 175 (01) 6-7
• 9 Butler PD, Britt LD, Longaker MT. Ethnic diversity remains scarce in academic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (05) 1618-1627
• 10 Okochi J. The medical manpower policies in advanced countries: an international comparative study of measures to adjust the number of physicians based on their specialties or regions they serve. The Journal of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia 2005; 25: 467-472
• 11 Contreras CM, Metzger GA, Beane JD, Dedhia PH, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Telemedicine: Patient-provider clinical engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24 (07) 1692-1697