Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(02): 092-101
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745745
Original Article

Comparative Analysis of Preoperative High Frequency Color Doppler Ultrasound versus MR Lymphangiography versus ICG Lymphography of Lymphatic Vessels in Lymphovenous Anastomosis

Hyung Bae Kim
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Sung Soo Jung
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Min-Jeong Cho 
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
,
Nicolas Peirera 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3   Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Hospital del Trabajador, Santiago, Chile
4   Department of Plastic Surgery, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
,
Changsik John Pak
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Peter Hyun Suk Suh
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Sang Hoon Lee
5   Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
,
Joon Pio Hong 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Despite the extensive use of various imaging modalities, there is limited literature on comparing the reliability between indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography, MR Lymphangiogram (MRL), and high frequency color Doppler ultrasound (HFCDU) to identify lymphatic vessels.

Method In this study of 124 patients, the correlation between preoperative image findings to the actual lymphatic vessel leading to lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) was evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and simple detection were calculated. Subgroup analysis was also performed according to the severity of lymphedema.

Results Total of 328 LVAs were performed. The HFCDU overall had significantly higher sensitivity for identifying lymphatic vessels (99%) over MRL (83.5%) and ICG lymphography (82.3%)(p < 0.0001). Both ICG lymphography and HFCDU had 100% specificity and PPV. The NPV was 3.6%, 6.5% and 57.1% respectively for MRL, ICG lymphography, and HFCDU. All modalities showed high sensitivity for early stage 2 lymphedema while HFCDU showed a significantly higher sensitivity for late stage 2 (MRL:79.7%, ICG:83.1%, HFCDU:97%) and stage 3 (MRL:79.7%, ICG:79.7%, HFCDU:100%) over the other two modalities (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion This study demonstrated while all three modalities are able to provide good information, the sensitivity may alter as the severity of lymphedema progresses. The HFCDU will provide the best detection for lymphatic vessels throughout all stages of lymphedema. However, as each modality provides different and unique information, combining and evaluating the data according to the stage of lymphedema will be able to maximize the chance for a successful surgical outcome.

Keywords

lymphedema - color duplex ultrasound - imaging


Publication History

Received: 18 December 2021

Accepted: 20 February 2022

Article published online:
14 April 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Olszewski WL. Lymphovenous microsurgical shunts in treatment of lymphedema of lower limbs: a 45-year experience of one surgeon/one center. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 45 (03) 282-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schaverien MV, Badash I, Patel KM, Selber JC, Cheng MH. Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Lymphedema. Semin Plast Surg 2018; 32 (01) 28-35
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nielubowicz J, Olszewski W. Experimental lymphovenous anastomosis. Br J Surg 1968; 55 (06) 449-451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Garza RM, Chang DW. Lymphovenous bypass for the treatment of lymphedema. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118 (05) 743-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hara H, Mihara M. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis for advanced-stage lower limb lymphedema. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (02) 140-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cha HG, Oh TM, Cho MJ. et al. Changing the Paradigm: Lymphovenous Anastomosis in Advanced Stage Lower Extremity Lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (01) 199-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pak CS, Suh HP, Kwon JG, Cho MJ, Hong JP. Lymph Node to Vein Anastomosis (LNVA) for lower extremity lymphedema. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (09) 2059-2067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Oh A, Kajita H, Matoba E. et al. Photoacoustic lymphangiography before and after lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 323-328
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hayashi A, Yoshimatsu H, Visconti G. et al. Intraoperative Real-Time Visualization of the Lymphatic Vessels Using Microscope-Integrated Laser Tomography. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (05) 427-435
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hayashi A, Giacalone G, Yamamoto T. et al. Ultra High-frequency Ultrasonographic Imaging with 70 MHz Scanner for Visualization of the Lymphatic Vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (01) e2086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Suzuki Y, Kajita H, Watanabe S. et al. Application of Photoacoustic Imaging for Lymphedema Treatment. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (03) 254-262
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hayashi A, Hayashi N, Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto T. Effective and efficient lymphaticovenular anastomosis using preoperative ultrasound detection technique of lymphatic vessels in lower extremity lymphedema. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117 (02) 290-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mazzei MA, Gentili F, Mazzei FG. et al. High-resolution MR lymphangiography for planning lymphaticovenous anastomosis treatment: a single-centre experience. Radiol Med (Torino) 2017; 122 (12) 918-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mihara M, Hara H, Kawakami Y. Ultrasonography for classifying lymphatic sclerosis types and deciding optimal sites for lymphatic-venous anastomosis in patients with lymphoedema. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (09) 1274-1281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kwon JG, Hong DW, Suh HP, Pak CJ, Hong JP. Patient-specific surgical options for breast cancer-related lymphedema: technical tips. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 246-253
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Forte AJ, Boczar D, Kassis S, Huayllani MT, McLaughlin SA. Use of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of therapeutic response in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review. Arch Plast Surg 2020; 47 (04) 305-309
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ogata F, Narushima M, Mihara M, Azuma R, Morimoto Y, Koshima I. Intraoperative lymphography using indocyanine green dye for near-infrared fluorescence labeling in lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (02) 180-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Unno N, Inuzuka K, Suzuki M. et al. Preliminary experience with a novel fluorescence lymphography using indocyanine green in patients with secondary lymphedema. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45 (05) 1016-1021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Notohamiprodjo M, Baumeister RG, Jakobs TF. et al. MR-lymphangiography at 3.0 T–a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2009; 19 (11) 2771-2778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ruehm SG, Schroeder T, Debatin JF. Interstitial MR lymphography with gadoterate meglumine: initial experience in humans. Radiology 2001; 220 (03) 816-821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cho MJ, Kwon JG, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. The Role of Duplex Ultrasound in Microsurgical Reconstruction: Review and Technical Considerations. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 514-521
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chang DW, Dayan J, Greene AK. et al. Surgical Treatment of Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. Results of a Consensus Conference. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (04) 975-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ 1994; 309 (6947): 102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Doi K. et al. Characteristic indocyanine green lymphography findings in lower extremity lymphedema: the generation of a novel lymphedema severity staging system using dermal backflow patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (05) 1979-1986
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mohos B, Czedik-Eysenberg M, Steinbacher J, Tinhofer I, Meng S, Tzou CJ. Long-term Use of Ultrasound for Locating Optimal LVA Sites: A Descriptive Data Analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Liu JB, Murphy G, Forsberg F. Contrast-enhanced sonographic imaging of lymphatic channels and sentinel lymph nodes. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24 (07) 953-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hayashi A, Yamamoto T, Yoshimatsu H. et al. Ultrasound visualization of the lymphatic vessels in the lower leg. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (05) 397-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bianchi A, Visconti G, Hayashi A, Santoro A, Longo V, Salgarello M. Ultra-High frequency ultrasound imaging of lymphatic channels correlates with their histological features: A step forward in lymphatic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (09) 1622-1629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hayashi A, Visconti G, Giacalone G, Hayashi N, Yoshimatsu H. Recent Advances in Ultrasound Technology: Ultra-High Frequency Ultrasound for Reconstructive Supermicrosurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (03) 193-199
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Yoshimatsu H. et al. Dynamic Indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography for breast cancer-related arm lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (06) 706-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yasunaga Y, Nakajima Y, Mimura S, Yuzuriha S, Kondoh S. Magnetic resonance lymphography as three-dimensional navigation for lymphaticovenular anastomosis in patients with leg lymphedema. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (06) 1253-1260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yasunaga Y, Kinjo Y, Nakajima Y. et al. Impact of Magnetic Resonance Lymphography on Lymphaticolvenular Anastomosis for Lower-Limb Lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (02) 121-128
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dayan JH, Wiser I, Verma R. et al. Regional Patterns of Fluid and Fat Accumulation in Patients with Lower Extremity Lymphedema Using Magnetic Resonance Angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 555-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Pereira N, Venegas J. Augmented Reality Microsurgical Planning with a Smartphone for Lymphovenous Anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (05) 955e-956e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Pereira N, Lee YH, Suh Y. et al. Cumulative Experience in Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Lymphedema Treatment: The Learning Curve Effect on the Overall Outcome. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (09) 735-741
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar