RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748159
First Trimester Cardiac Biomarkers among Women with Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Are There Early Clues to This Late-Pregnancy Phenomenon?
Funding Abbott Diagnostics supported this study in the form of hscTnI assay materials. The remainder of the study was supported by the Massachusetts General Hospital Corrigan Women's Heart Health Program.Abstract
Objective Whether biomarkers may enable early identification of women who develop peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) prior to disease onset remains a question of interest.
Study Design A retrospective nested case–control study was conducted to determine whether first trimester N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) differed among women who developed PPCM versus unaffected pregnancies. Cases were matched to unaffected women by age, race, parity, and gestational age of sample (control A) and then further by blood pressure and pregnancy weight gain (control B).
Results First trimester NT-proBNP concentrations were numerically higher among women who subsequently developed PPCM (116 pg/mL [83–177]) as compared with women in control A (56.1 pg/mL [38.7–118.7], p = 0.3) or control B (37.6 [23.3 − 53.8], p <0.05). A higher proportion of women who subsequently developed PPCM (50%) had detectable levels of hs-cTnI as compared with control A (0%, p = 0.03) or control B (18.8%, p = 0.52). Among both cases and controls, hs-cTnI values were low and often below the limit of detection.
Conclusion There were differences in first trimester NT-proBNP and hs-cTnI concentrations between women who subsequently developed PPCM and those who did not, raising the possibility the early pregnancy subclinical myocardial dysfunction may be associated with this late-pregnancy disease.
Key Points
-
First trimester NT-proBNP is numerically higher among women who subsequently develop PPCM.
-
First trimester hs-cTnI was nominally higher among women who developed PPCM versus those who did not.
-
A significant proportion of normal pregnant women have undetectable hs-cTnI.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 13. August 2021
Angenommen: 01. März 2022
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Mai 2022
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Davis MB, Arany Z, McNamara DM, Goland S, Elkayam U. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75 (02) 207-221
- 2 Hameed AB, Chan K, Ghamsary M, Elkayam U. Longitudinal changes in the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in normal pregnancy and postpartum. Clin Cardiol 2009; 32 (08) E60-E62
- 3 Mayama M, Yoshihara M, Uno K. et al. Factors influencing brain natriuretic peptide levels in healthy pregnant women. Int J Cardiol 2017; 228: 749-753
- 4 Furenäs E, Eriksson P, Wennerholm UB, Dellborg M. Pregnancy in a healthy population: dynamics of NTproBNP and hs-cTroponin T. Open Heart 2020; 7 (02) 7
- 5 Ravichandran J, Woon SY, Quek YS. et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin i levels in normal and hypertensive pregnancy. Am J Med 2019; 132 (03) 362-366
- 6 Smith R, Silversides C, Downey K, Newton G, Macarthur A. Assessing the incidence of peripartum subclinical myocardial ischemia using the troponin T assay: an observational pilot study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2015; 24 (01) 30-34
- 7 Muijsers HEC, Westermann D, Birukov A. et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia. J Hypertens 2020; 38 (10) 1948-1954
- 8 Álvarez-Fernández I, Prieto B, Rodríguez V, Ruano Y, Escudero AI, Álvarez FV. N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and angiogenic biomarkers in the prognosis of adverse outcomes in women with suspected preeclampsia. Clin Chim Acta 2016; 463: 150-157
- 9 Ware JS, Seidman JG, Arany Z. Shared genetic predisposition in peripartum and dilated cardiomyopathies. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (26) 2601-2602
- 10 Resnik JL, Hong C, Resnik R. et al. Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in normal and preeclamptic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (02) 450-454