Does Simultaneous Fusion of Preexisting Spinal Canal Stenosis Adjacent to Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Achieve a Better Clinical Outcome? A Retrospective Study with More than 5-year Follow-Up

Abstract

Background In this study, we investigate the effect of simultaneous fusion of preexisting adjacent spinal canal stenosis on the outcome of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Methods Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from August 2013 to March 2016 were included. The inclusion criteria were the following: single-level spondylolisthesis (L4 or L5) and mild to moderate spinal stenosis at cranial adjacent segment of the spondylolisthesis segment before operation. According to whether the adjacent stenotic segment was included in the scope of surgery, the patients were divided into two groups: group A, only the spondylolisthesis was treated with single-level TLIF, and the adjacent stenosis was not treated with any surgery; In group B, TLIF were performed in the spondylolisthesis segment and the adjacent stenotic level; no spinal stenosis was found in other levels. The patients were followed up for more than 5 years. The general information before operation, visual analog scale (VAS) scores of low back pain and leg pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores before operation and at the last follow-up were recorded.

Results A total of 23 patients were included in group A, and 24 patients were included in group B. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender distribution, age, course of disease, level of slippage, length of stay, degree of spondylolisthesis, stenotic grade of adjacent segment, and intervertebral disk degeneration grade (p> 0.05). The blood loss during surgery in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (p< 0.05). The operation time of group B was longer than that of group A, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.245). There was no significant difference in preoperative VAS and ODI scores between the two groups. At the last follow-up, the VAS scores of low back pain in the two groups were almost the same. However, the VAS scores of leg pain and ODI scores in group B were slightly higher than those in group A at the last follow-up, but the difference was not statistically significant (p> 0.05). If relatives and friends have the similar disease, all the patients of group A and 87.5% of patients in group B would recommend that type of surgery. The satisfaction of group A (100%) was higher than that of group B (79.17%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.068).

Conclusions For single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis with mild to moderate spinal stenosis in adjacent segment before operation, decompression and fusion on the level of spondylolisthesis only is a safe, less invasive, and economical surgical option, with good long-term clinical efficacy and high satisfaction rates.

Keywords

spondylolisthesis - spinal stenosis - lumbar fusion - adjacent segment degeneration

Publication History

Received: 25 September 2021

Accepted: 15 February 2022

Article published online:
28 July 2022

• References

• 1 Zhong Z-M, Deviren V, Tay B, Burch S, Berven SH. Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for adult lumbar spondylolisthesis: incidence and risk factors. ClinNeurolNeurosurg 2017; 156: 29-34
• 2 Tsuji T, Watanabe K, Hosogane N. et al. Risk factors of radiological adjacent disc degeneration with lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. J OrthopSci 2016; 21 (02) 133-137
• 3 Moreau P-E, Ferrero E, Riouallon G, Lenoir T, Guigui P. Radiologic adjacent segment degeneration 2 years after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. OrthopTraumatolSurg Res 2016; 102 (06) 759-763
• 4 Lee GY, Lee JW, Choi HS, Oh KJ, Kang HS. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40 (08) 1033-1039
• 5 Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001; 26 (17) 1873-1878
• 6 Qin R, Wu T, Liu H, Zhou B, Zhou P, Zhang X. Minimally invasive versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 21851
• 7 Kuo CH, Huang W-C, Wu JC. et al. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2018; 29 (03) 250-258
• 8 Imagama S, Kawakami N, Matsubara Y. et al. Radiographic adjacent segment degeneration at 5 years after l4/5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: evaluation by computed tomography and annual screening with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Spine Surg 2016; 29 (09) E442-E451
• 9 Kanamori M, Yasuda T, Hori T, Suzuki K, Kawaguchi Y. Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: progressive pattern of the adjacent disc degeneration. Asian Spine J 2012; 6 (02) 105-114
• 10 Yugué I, Okada S, Masuda M, Ueta T, Maeda T, Shiba K. Risk factors for adjacent segment pathology requiring additional surgery after single-level spinal fusion: impact of pre-existing spinal stenosis demonstrated by preoperative myelography. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (05) 1542-1549
• 11 Lawrence BD, Wang J, Arnold PM, Hermsmeyer J, Norvell DC, Brodke DS. Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology after lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Spine 2012; 37 (22, Suppl): S123-S132
• 12 Levin JM, Alentado VJ, Healy AT, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Superior segment facet joint violation during instrumented lumbar fusion is associated with higher reoperation rates and diminished improvement in quality of life. ClinSpineSurg 2018; 31 (01) E36-E41
• 13 Wang M, Xu L, Chen X. et al. Optimal reconstruction of sagittal alignment according to global alignment and proportion score can reduce adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion. Spine 2021; 46 (04) E257-E266
• 14 Zhang X, Zhu J, Li Y, Hao D, Gao W. A modified method to treat severe asymptomatic pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment: a retrospective case-control study. BMC Surg 2021; 21 (01) 161
• 15 Kim KR, Lee CK, Kim IS. Efficacy of interspinous device on adjacent segment degeneration after single level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Br J Neurosurg 2021; 35 (06) 757-765
• 16 Choi KC, Shim HK, Kim JS, Lee SH. Does pre-existing L5-S1 degeneration affect outcomes after isolated L4-5 fusion for spondylolisthesis?. J OrthopSurg Res 2015; 10: 39
• 17 Sun Z, Li Z, Guo Y. et al. Evaluation of adjacent segment with pre-existing degeneration using the cerebrospinal fluid occlusion sign on MRI before posterior lumbar fusion: a multi-center observational cohort study. Global Spine J 2023; Apr; 13 (03) 745-751