CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2022; 10(03): 095-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748842
State-of-the-Art Review

Early Repair of Aortic Wall Structural Defect by “Net” Endoprosthesis to Arrest the Aneurysm without Interference with Aortic Branch Vessel Perfusion

1   Department of Research, Fondazione Alexis Carrel, Basiglio (MI), Italy
› Author Affiliations
Funding Partially funded by IRCCS SAN MATTEO HOS PAVIA 1992-1995.

Abstract

Current treatments of aortic aneurysm include surgical or endovascular, respectively, anatomical or functional, substitution of the aneurysm tract; however, with these methods, perfusion of at least some collateral branches cannot be fully restored, leading to the risk of paraplegia. We present a novel endovascular “net” prosthesis to strengthen the aortic wall while preserving perfusion of collateral branches. This consists of a polyester mesh “net”-layered conduit in a variable cylindrical shape, which is personalized based on patient computed tomography scan images, and is defined by circular crossing spirals of a thin nitinol wire. The prosthetic conduit, shrunk by compressing the nitinol spirals, can be inserted into the vascular lumen and expanded in situ. Then, the insertion control device can be fully removed. Thus, the, “net” prosthesis, positioned inside the aorta in stable contact with the intimal wall for 2 to 5 months, is colonized by neointima and spontaneously moved deeper into the aortic wall in contact with the media, thus being ideally able to stabilize aortic diameter without interference with collateral branch blood perfusion. This new, (ideally) paraplegia-free procedure is aimed at curing the aortic wall structural defect, thus arresting the aneurysm from further progression. This contrasts with current treatments, indicated by aneurysm dimensions for their implied complication risk, which are actually for prophylaxis of impending rupture or dissection rather than fortification of the natural aorta. Moreover, this new approach can be used alongside open surgical procedures (personalized external aortic root support) as well as a frozen “net” elephant trunk technique, for full aortic stabilization.



Publication History

Received: 25 February 2021

Accepted: 04 October 2021

Article published online:
01 November 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Mourad Z, Luzzana F, Salvi S, Nazari S. Aortic wall strengthening by intraluminal fabric “net” to arrest aneurysm progression and prevent rupture. Poster n° 113 8th Annual Meeting EACTS The Hague September 25–28, 1994
  • 2 Nazari S. Aortic Wall Strengthening by Endovascular “Net” Prosthesis for Aortic Aneurysm Prevention in Marfan Syndrome and Other Genetic Disorder. Read at 53th STS/AATS Tech-Con 2017, Houston, Texas, January 21, 2017. On line at https://youtu.be/10s18RJzJ0Q
  • 3 Nazari S, Luzzana F, Carli F. et al. Aortic wall structural strengthening by intraluminal net prosthesis to arrest aneurysm progression and rupture. Experimental assessment of a new therapeutic approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10 (04) 264-272
  • 4 Carrel A. Anastomose bout à bout de la jugulaire et de la carotide primitive. Lyon Med 1902; 99: 114
  • 5 Treasure T, Petrou M, Rosendahl U. et al. Personalized External Aortic Root Support: a review of the current status. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50 (03) 400-404
  • 6 Volodos NL. The 30th anniversary of the first clinical application of endovascular stent-grafting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49 (05) 495-497
  • 7 Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991; 5 (06) 491-499
  • 8 Borst HG. The birth of the elephant trunk technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145 (01) 44
  • 9 Martens A, Beckmann E, Kaufeld T. et al. Total aortic arch repair: risk factor analysis and follow-up in 199 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50 (05) 940-948
  • 10 Etz CD, Kari FA, Mueller CS. et al. The collateral network concept: a reassessment of the anatomy of spinal cord perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141 (04) 1020-1028
  • 11 Etz CD, Zoli S, Bishoff MS, Di Luozzo G, Griepp RB. Measuring the collateral network pressure to minimize paraplegia risk in thoracoabdominal aneurysms resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 140: 6S
  • 12 Pande RL, Beckman JA. Pathophysiology, epidemiology, and prognosis of aortic aneurysms. In: Vascular Medicine a Companion to Braunwalds Heart Disease. Ch. 37. Available at: https://clinicalgate.com/pathophysiology-epidemiology-and-prognosis-of-aortic-aneurysms/
  • 13 Gott VL, Laschinger JC, Cameron DE. et al. The Marfan syndrome and the cardiovascular surgeon. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10 (03) 149-158
  • 14 Nazari S. Internal versus external aortic support. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10 (03) 365
  • 15 Pepper J, Golesworthy T, Utley M. et al. Manufacturing and placing a bespoke support for the Marfan aortic root: description of the method and technical results and status at one year for the first ten patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10 (03) 360-365
  • 16 Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ. Hemodynamic considerations regarding the mechanism and prevention of aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58 (04) 1247-1253
  • 17 Golesworthy T, Lampérth M, Mohiaddin R, Pepper J, Thornton W, Treasure T. The Tailor of Gloucester: a jacket for the Marfan's aorta. Lancet 2004; 364 (9445): 1582
  • 18 Pepper J. An update on PEARS. EACTS Daily News Issue 4, Tuesday 10 October 2017. Accessed August 26, 2018 at: https://exstent.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/EACTS-Daily-News-item-on-PEARS.pdf
  • 19 Powell JT, Gotensparre SM, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Fowkes FG, Thompson SG. Rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41 (01) 2-10
  • 20 Pape LA, Tsai TT, Isselbacher EM. et al; International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators. Aortic diameter >or = 5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type A aortic dissection: observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation 2007; 116 (10) 1120-1127
  • 21 Acharya MN, Youssefi P, Soppa G. et al. Analysis of aortic area/height ratio in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm and Type A dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 54 (04) 696-701
  • 22 Fairman AS, Wang GJ, Jackson BM. et al. Characterization and outcomes of reinterventions in Food and Drug Administration-approved versus trial endovascular aneurysm repair devices. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67 (04) 1082-1090
  • 23 Chen CK, Chou HP, Chang YY, Shih CC. Elongation of the aorta after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a longitudinal study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 (04) 1205
  • 24 Nazari S. Expandable device type III for easy and reliable approximation of dissection layers in sutureless aortic anastomosis. Ex vivo experimental study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10 (02) 161-164
  • 25 Nazari S, Luzzana F, Banfi C. et al. Expandable prosthesis for sutureless anastomosis in thoracic aorta prosthetic substitution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10 (11) 1003-1009
  • 26 Nazari S. New approaches for treatment and prevention of aortic aneurysms. In: Front Lines of Thoracic Surgery. Nazari S, ed. Croatia: InTech Publisher; 2012: 263-292