The Rhytidectomy Scar: Analysis of Patient and Surgeon Perspectives

Abstract

An understanding of patient preference is vital for surgeons to create outcomes that align with the goals of patients undergoing cosmetic surgery. This study analyzes the perception of the rhytidectomy scar from the perspective of cosmetic patients and surgeons. Cross-sectional surveys were administered in-person to cosmetic patients and online to facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons in the United States. Participants were presented with standardized lateral view photographs of preauricular scars for 10 patients at least 12 months post rhytidectomy procedure. A variety of rhytidectomy incisions were chosen to include pre- versus post-tragal incisions, blunted hair tuft, hypopigmentation, narrow versus wide scar healing. Participants were asked to rate the outcome of the preauricular rhytidectomy scar using the Likert scale from 1 to 10. Quantitative analysis indicates that while both surgeons and cosmetic patients viewed hypopigmented scars less favorably, surgeons were more concerned with pre-tragal incision and blunted hair tuft. Furthermore, the number of rhytidectomies performed by surgeons resulted in more critical analysis of the scars presented in this study. Qualitative analysis of the frequent use of “natural” in the patient comments suggests the importance of maintaining a sense of “normalcy” as well. In contrast, the surgeon comments are most frequently about the relationship between the scar and surrounding anatomical structures, suggesting a descriptive focus on the technicality of scar placement and subsequent anatomical result. Cosmetic patients are primarily concerned about scar appearance while surgeons are more focused on the technical orientation of the scar. An understanding and comparison of the language and perceptions of surgeons and cosmetic patients regarding rhytidectomy scars are vital in creating aesthetic results and managing patient expectations.

Keywords

rhytidectomy scar - facelift scar - hypopigmented scar - incision placement

Publication History

Article published online:
24 June 2022

• References

• 1 Nellis JC, Ishii M, Papel ID. et al. Association of face-lift surgery with social perception, age, attractiveness, health, and success. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (04) 311-317
• 2 Kumar AR, Ishii LE, Papel I. et al. The valuation of rhytidectomy in different economic markets. Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36 (05) 665-669
• 3 Brown BC, Moss TP, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (06) 1022-1029
• 4 Jagosh J, Donald Boudreau J, Steinert Y, Macdonald ME, Ingram L. The importance of physician listening from the patients' perspective: enhancing diagnosis, healing, and the doctor-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 85 (03) 369-374
• 5 Gantwerker EA, Hom DB. Skin: histology and physiology of wound healing. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (03) 441-453
• 6 Roy S, Buckingham ED. Comparison of W-plasty and straight-line trichophytic closure on aesthetic outcomes of occipital hairline scars in rhytidectomy. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (01) 14-18
• 7 Kridel RWH, Liu ES. Techniques for creating inconspicuous face-lift scars: avoiding visible incisions and loss of temporal hair. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (04) 325-333
• 8 Benedict R. Anthropology and the Abnormal. J Gen Psychol 1934; 10: 59-82
• 9 US Census Bureau.. Accessed August 28, 2021 at: https://factfinder.census.gov