Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750296
Predicting the Position of the Internal Landmarks of Middle Cranial Fossa Using the Zygomatic Root: An Attempt to Simplify Its Complexity
Abstract
Subtemporal–extradural middle cranial fossa (MCF) surgical approach is used to access pathologies involving anterior or posterior part of the petrous bone or its apex. A reliable and precise identification of the important internal landmarks is key to a safe surgery with decreased incidence of morbidity. The zygomatic root (ZR) serves as a reliable reference guide for the surgeon when navigating through the MCF. The aim of the study is to establish an association between the extent of the ZR to the key internal foramina and bony prominences in lateral fossa of the MCF to help the neurosurgeon to safely navigate through the maze of structures of the MCF. The study demonstrates that the ZR is a reliable marker to estimate and predict the position of foramen ovale, foramen spinosum, and trigeminal fossa but not for the position of hiatus of greater petrosal nerve or the arcuate eminence. Successful localization of the foramen ovale, spinosum, and trigeminal fossa would reduce intraoperative time, ensure lesser retraction of brain, and hence reduce patient morbidity while performing surgeries on lesions of/in the internal acoustic canal, petroclival junctions, cerebellopontine angles, basilar artery, or transovale cannulation for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
* Presently working at University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
Publication History
Article published online:
27 June 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Dayoub H, Schueler WB, Shakir H, Kimmell KT, Sincoff EH. The relationship between the zygomatic arch and the floor of the middle cranial fossa: a radiographic study. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6, Suppl Operative): 363-369
- 2 Zanoletti E, Martini A, Emanuelli E, Mazzoni A. Lateral approaches to the skull base. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2012; 32 (05) 281-287
- 3 Maina R, Ducati A, Lanzino G. The middle cranial fossa: morphometric study and surgical considerations. Skull Base 2007; 17 (06) 395-403
- 4 Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 42nd edition.. London: Elsevier; 2020: 560-563
- 5 Djalilian HR, Thakkar KH, Hamidi S, Benson AG, Mafee MF. A study of middle cranial fossa anatomy and anatomic variations. Ear Nose Throat J 2007; 86 (08) 474-481 , 476–481
- 6 Beckman JM, Vale FL. Using the zygomatic root as a reference point in temporal lobe surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (12) 2287-2291
- 7 Komune N, Matsushima K, Matsuo S, Safavi-Abbasi S, Matsumoto N, Rhoton Jr AL. The accuracy of an electromagnetic navigation system in lateral skull base approaches. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (02) 450-459
- 8 Peris Celda M, Perry A, Carlstorm LP, Graffeo CS, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. . Key anatomical landmarks for middle fossa surgery: a surgical anatomy study. J Neurosurg 2019; 131: 1561-1570
- 9 Krayenbühl N, Isolan GR, Al-Mefty O. The foramen spinosum: a landmark in middle fossa surgery. Neurosurg Rev 2008; 31 (04) 397-401 , discussion 401–402
- 10 Tubbs RS, Custis JW, Salter EG, Sheetz J, Zehren SJ, Oakes WJ. Landmarks for the greater petrosal nerve. Clin Anat 2005; 18 (03) 210-214
- 11 Jittapiromsak P, Sabuncuoglu H, Deshmukh P, Nakaji P, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Greater superficial petrosal nerve dissection: back to front or front to back?. Neurosurgery 2009;64(5, Suppl 2):253–258, discussion 258–259
- 12 Sennaroglu L, Slattery III WH. Petrous anatomy for middle fossa approach. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (02) 332-342
- 13 Georgiopoulos M, Ellul J, Chroni E, Constantoyannis C. Minimizing technical failure of percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia using neuronavigation. ISRN Neurol 2014; 2014: 630418
- 14 Zdilla MJ, Hatfield SA, McLean KA, Cyrus LM, Laslo JM, Lambert HW. Circularity, solidity, axes of a best fit ellipse, aspect ratio, and roundness of the foramen ovale: a morphometric analysis with neurosurgical considerations. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (01) 222-228
- 15 Zdilla MJ, Hatfield SA, Mangus KR. The angular relationship between the foramen ovale and the trigeminal impression: percutaneous cannulation trajectories for trigeminal neuralgia. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (08) 2177-2180
- 16 Ilayperuma I. Evaluation of cephalic indices: a clue for racial and sex diversity. Int J Morphol 2011; 29: 112-117
- 17 Khanduri S, Malik S, Khan N. et al. Establishment of Cephalic Index using cranial parameters in a sampled north Indian population. Cureus 2021; 13 (06) e15421