Download PDF
Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2023; 58(02): 303-312
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750760
Artigo Original
Joelho

Application of 3D Printing Technology in the Treatment of Hoffa's Fracture Nonunion

Article in several languages: português | English

Authors

  • Celso Júnio Aguiar Mendonça 

    1   Unidade do Sistema Musculoesquelético, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil
    2   Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica e Informática Industrial, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil

  • Sidney Carlos Gasoto 

    2   Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica e Informática Industrial, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil

  • Ivan Moura Belo 

    3   Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil

  • João Antônio Palma Setti 

    3   Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil

  • Jamil Faissal Soni 

    1   Unidade do Sistema Musculoesquelético, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil
    4   Hospital Universitário Cajuru, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil

  • Bertoldo Schneider Júnior 

    2   Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica e Informática Industrial, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil
    3   Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil
Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Objective To evaluate a proposed three-dimensional (3D) printing process of a biomodel developed with the aid of fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology based on computed tomography (CT) scans of an individual with nonunion of a coronal femoral condyle fracture (Hoffa's fracture).

Materials and Methods Thus, we used CT scans, which enable the evaluation of the 3D volumetric reconstruction of the anatomical model, as well as of the architecture and bone geometry of sites with complex anatomy, such as the joints. In addition, it enables the development of the virtual surgical planning (VSP) in a computer-aided design (CAD) software. This technology makes it possible to print full-scale anatomical models that can be used in surgical simulations for training and in the choice of the best placement of the implant according to the VSP. In the radiographic evaluation of the osteosynthesis of the Hoffa's fracture nonunion, we assessed the position of the implant in the 3D-printed anatomical model and in the patient's knee.

Results The 3D-printed anatomical model showed geometric and morphological characteristics similar to those of the actual bone. The position of the implants in relation to the nonunion line and anatomical landmarks showed great accuracy in the comparison of the patient's knee with the 3D-printed anatomical model.

Conclusion The use of the virtual anatomical model and the 3D-printed anatomical model with the additive manufacturing (AM) technology proved to be effective and useful in planning and performing the surgical treatment of Hoffa's fracture nonunion. Thus, it showed great accuracy in the reproducibility of the virtual surgical planning and the 3D-printed anatomical model.

Keywords

Hoffa's fracture - pseudarthrosis - printing, three-dimensional - orthopedic surgery

Financial Support

The authors declare they have received no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.


* Work developed at the Federal Technological University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.




Publication History

Received: 01 March 2022

Accepted: 28 April 2022

Article published online:
03 October 2022

© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Zheng W, Su J, Cai L. et al. Application of 3D-printing technology in the treatment of humeral intercondylar fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104 (01) 83-88
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Rankin TM, Wormer BA, Miller JD, Giovinco NA, Al Kassis S, Armstrong DG. Image once, print thrice? Three-dimensional printing of replacement parts. Br J Radiol 2018; 91 (1083): 20170374
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Morgan C, Khatri C, Hanna SA, Ashrafian H, Sarraf KM. Use of three-dimensional printing in preoperative planning in orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Orthop 2020; 11 (01) 57-67
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Samaila EM, Negri S, Zardini A. et al. Value of three-dimensional printing of fractures in orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Int Med Res 2020; 48 (01) 300060519887299
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Vaishya R, Patralekh MK, Vaish A, Agarwal AK, Vijay V. Publication trends and knowledge mapping in 3D printing in orthopaedics. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2018; 9 (03) 194-201
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Mishra A, Verma T, Vaish A, Vaish R, Vaishya R, Maini L. Virtual preoperative planning and 3D printing are valuable for the management of complex orthopaedic trauma. Chin J Traumatol 2019; 22 (06) 350-355
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Pires RE, Giordano V, Fogagnolo F, Yoon RS, Liporace FA, Kfuri M. Algorithmic treatment of Busch-Hoffa distal femur fractures: A technical note based on a modified Letenneur classification. Injury 2018; 49 (08) 1623-1629
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Sun H, He QF, Huang YG, Pan JF, Luo CF, Chai YM. Plate fixation for Letenneur type I Hoffa fracture: a biomechanical study. Injury 2017; 48 (07) 1492-1498
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Buckley RE, Moran CG, Apivatthakakul T. , Eds. AO Principles of Fracture Management. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018
  • 10 Bagaria V, Chaudhary K. A paradigm shift in surgical planning and simulation using 3Dgraphy: Experience of first 50 surgeries done using 3D-printed biomodels. Injury 2017; 48 (11) 2501-2508
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Marro A, Bandukwala T, Mak W. Three-Dimensional Printing and Medical Imaging: A Review of the Methods and Applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016; 45 (01) 2-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hoang D, Perrault D, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A. Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4 (23) 456-475
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 van Eijnatten M, van Dijk R, Dobbe J, Streekstra G, Koivisto J, Wolff J. CT image segmentation methods for bone used in medical additive manufacturing. Med Eng Phys 2018; 51: 6-16
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Aimar A, Palermo A, Innocenti B. The Role of 3D Printing in Medical Applications: A State of the Art. J Healthc Eng 2019; 2019: 5340616
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kim JW, Lee Y, Seo J. et al. Clinical experience with three-dimensional printing techniques in orthopedic trauma. J Orthop Sci 2018; 23 (02) 383-388
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Bizzotto N, Tami I, Tami A. et al. 3D Printed models of distal radius fractures. Injury 2016; 47 (04) 976-978
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online 2016; 15 (01) 115
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Wilcox B, Mobbs RJ, Wu AM, Phan K. Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play. J Spine Surg 2017; 3 (03) 433-443
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Zheng W, Chen C, Zhang C, Tao Z, Cai L. The Feasibility of 3D Printing Technology on the Treatment of Pilon Fracture and Its Effect on Doctor-Patient Communication. BioMed Res Int 2018; 2018: 8054698
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Langridge B, Momin S, Coumbe B, Woin E, Griffin M, Butler P. Systematic Review of the Use of 3-Dimensional Printing in Surgical Teaching and Assessment. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (01) 209-221
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Montgomery SJ, Kooner SS, Ludwig TE, Schneider PS. Impact of 3D Printed Calcaneal Models on Fracture Understanding and Confidence in Orthopedic Surgery Residents. J Surg Educ 2020; 77 (02) 472-478
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bagaria V, Deshpande S, Rasalkar DD, Kuthe A, Paunipagar BK. Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80 (03) 814-820
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Shui W, Zhou M, Chen S. et al. The production of digital and printed resources from multiple modalities using visualization and three-dimensional printing techniques. Int J CARS 2017; 12 (01) 13-23
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Mulford JS, Babazadeh S, Mackay N. Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: review of current and future applications. ANZ J Surg 2016; 86 (09) 648-653
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Malik HH, Darwood ARJ, Shaunak S. et al. Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res 2015; 199 (02) 512-522
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Cromeens BP, Ray WC, Hoehne B, Abayneh F, Adler B, Besner GE. Facilitating surgeon understanding of complex anatomy using a three-dimensional printed model. J Surg Res 2017; 216: 18-25
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Fadero PE, Shah M. Three dimensional (3D) modelling and surgical planning in trauma and orthopaedics. Surgeon 2014; 12 (06) 328-333
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Egger J, Wallner J, Gall M. et al. Computer-aided position planning of miniplates to treat facial bone defects. PLoS One 2017; 12 (08) e0182839
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Zhang Y, Wen L, Zhang J, Yan G, Zhou Y, Huang B. Three-dimensional printing and computer navigation assisted hemipelvectomy for en bloc resection of osteochondroma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (12) e6414
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Xiong L, Li X, Li H, Chen Z, Xiao T. The efficacy of 3D printing-assisted surgery for traumatic fracture: a meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J 2019; 95 (1126): 414-419
    Search in Google Scholar