PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2022; 17(02): 178-188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750779
Original Article

Comparison of Glioblastoma Outcomes in Two Geographically and Ethnically Distinct Patient Populations in Disparate Health Care Systems

Farhan A. Mirza
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kentucky Neuroscience Institute (KNI), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
2   Department of Neurosurgery, The Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
,
Muhammad Waqas S. Baqai
3   Department of Surgery, Section of Neurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
,
Ummey Hani
3   Department of Surgery, Section of Neurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
,
Maher Hulou
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kentucky Neuroscience Institute (KNI), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
,
Muhammad Shahzad Shamim
3   Department of Surgery, Section of Neurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
,
Syed Ather Enam
3   Department of Surgery, Section of Neurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
,
Thomas Pittman
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kentucky Neuroscience Institute (KNI), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Variations in glioblastoma (GBM) outcomes between geographically and ethnically distinct patient populations has been rarely studied. To explore the possible similarities and differences, we performed a comparative analysis of GBM patients at the University of Kentucky (UK) in the United States and the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) in Pakistan.

Methods A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for GBM between January 2013 and December 2016 at UK, and July 2014 and December 2017 at AKUH. Patients with recurrent or multifocal disease on presentation and those who underwent only a biopsy were excluded. SPSS (v.25 IBM, Armonk, New York, United States) was used to collect and analyze data.

Results Eighty-six patients at UK (mean age: 58.8 years; 37 [43%] < 60 years and 49 [57%] > 60 years) and 38 patients at AKUH (mean age: 49.1 years; 30 (79%) < 60 years and 8 (21%) > 60 years) with confirmed GBM were studied. At UK, median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9–14) months, while at AKUH, median OS was 18 (95% CI: 13.9–22) months (p = 0.002). With gross-total resection (GTR), median OS at UK was 16 (95% CI: 9.5–22.4) months, whereas at AKUH, it was 24 (95% CI: 17.6–30.3) months (p = 0.011).

Conclusion Median OS at UK was consistent with U.S. data but was noted to be longer at AKUH, likely due to a younger patient cohort and higher preoperative Karnofsky's performance scale (KPS). GTR, particularly in patients younger than 60 years of age and a higher preoperative KPS had a significant positive impact on OS and progression-free survival (PFS) at both institutions.

Keywords

glioma - glioblastoma - survival - population heterogeneity - health care system - Pakistan

Note

Portions of this manuscript were presented in poster format at the 2019 Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) meeting held in San Francisco, California, United States of America, in October 19-23, 2019.


Authors' Contributions

F.A.M. contributed to the study conceptualization, data collection and analysis, literature review, developing and finalizing themanuscript, approval of the final manuscript M.W.S.B. contributed to data collection and analysis and manuscript development. U.H. contributed to data collection and analysis and manuscript development. M.M.H. contributed to data collection and analysis and manuscript development. M.S.S. contributed to the study supervision and conceptualization, manuscript development, and approval of the final manuscript. S.A.E. contributed to the study supervision and approval of the final manuscript. T.P. contributed to the study supervision and conceptualization, approval of the final manuscript.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. August 2022

© 2022. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ. et al; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 (10) 987-996
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Chien LN, Ostrom QT, Gittleman H. et al. International differences in treatment and clinical outcomes for high grade glioma. PLoS One 2015; 10 (06) e0129602
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR. et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (02) 190-198
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sanai N, Berger MS. Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (04) 753-764 , discussion 264–266
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 5 McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Gathinji M. et al. Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma. J Neurosurg 2009; 110 (01) 156-162
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Sanai N, Polley MY, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Berger MS. An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (01) 3-8
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Orringer D, Lau D, Khatri S. et al. Extent of resection in patients with glioblastoma: limiting factors, perception of resectability, and effect on survival. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (05) 851-859
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Chaichana KL, Cabrera-Aldana EE, Jusue-Torres I. et al. When gross total resection of a glioblastoma is possible, how much resection should be achieved?. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (1-2): e257-e265
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Li YM, Suki D, Hess K, Sawaya R. The influence of maximum safe resection of glioblastoma on survival in 1229 patients: Can we do better than gross-total resection?. J Neurosurg 2016; 124 (04) 977-988
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Thakkar JP, Dolecek TA, Horbinski C. et al. Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23 (10) 1985-1996
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Xu H, Chen J, Xu H, Qin Z. Geographic variations in the incidence of glioblastoma and prognostic factors predictive of overall survival in US adults from 2004-2013. Front Aging Neurosci 2017; 9: 352
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Irfan A, Qureshi A. Intracranial space occupying lesions–review of 386 cases. J Pak Med Assoc 1995; 45 (12) 319-320
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Hashmi AA, Faridi N, Malik B, Edhi MM, Khurshid A, Khan M. Morphologic spectrum of glial tumors: an increased trend towards oligodendroglial tumors in Pakistan. Int Arch Med 2014; 7: 33
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ahmed Z, Muzaffar S, Kayani N, Pervez S, Husainy AS, Hasan SH. Histological pattern of central nervous system neoplasms. J Pak Med Assoc 2001; 51 (04) 154-157
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Shah SH, Soomro IN, Hussainy AS, Hassan SH. Clinico-morphological pattern of intracranial tumors in children. J Pak Med Assoc 1999; 49 (03) 63-65
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Shahid S, Hussain K. Role of glioblastoma craniotomy related to patient survival: a 10-year survey in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78 (02) 132-138
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hani Abdullah UE, Laghari AA, Khalid MU. et al. Current management of glioma in Pakistan. Glioma 2019; 2: 139-144
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mirza FA, Shamim MS. Tumour Treating Fields (TTFs) for recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Pak Med Assoc 2018; 68 (10) 1543-1545
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA. et al. Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314 (23) 2535-2543
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, Wiestler OD, Zanella F, Reulen HJ. ALA-Glioma Study Group. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7 (05) 392-401
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Liang D, Schulder M. The role of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery. Surg Neurol Int 2012; 3 (Suppl. 04) S320-S327
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Smith JS, Chang EF, Lamborn KR. et al. Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (08) 1338-1345
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 23 McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Attenello FJ. et al. Extent of surgical resection is independently associated with survival in patients with hemispheric infiltrating low-grade gliomas. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (04) 700-707 , author reply 707–708
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 A. Mirza F, Shamim MS. Extent of resection and timing of surgery in adult low grade glioma. J Pak Med Assoc 2017; 67 (06) 959-961
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Esquenazi Y, Friedman E, Liu Z, Zhu JJ, Hsu S, Tandon N. The survival advantage of “supratotal” resection of glioblastoma using selective cortical mapping and the subpial technique. Neurosurgery 2017; 81 (02) 275-288
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Yan JL, van der Hoorn A, Larkin TJ, Boonzaier NR, Matys T, Price SJ. Extent of resection of peritumoral diffusion tensor imaging-detected abnormality as a predictor of survival in adult glioblastoma patients. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (01) 234-241
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Mirza FA, Wang C, Pittman T. Can patients safely be admitted to a ward after craniotomy for resection of intra-axial brain tumors?. Br J Neurosurg 2018; 32 (02) 201-205
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Johnson DR, Guerin JB, Giannini C, Morris JM, Eckel LJ, Kaufmann TJ. 2016 updates to the WHO brain tumor classification system: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 2017; 37 (07) 2164-2180
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016; 131 (06) 803-820
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Eoli M, Menghi F, Bruzzone MG. et al. Methylation of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and loss of heterozygosity on 19q and/or 17p are overlapping features of secondary glioblastomas with prolonged survival. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13 (09) 2606-2613
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Olson RA, Brastianos PK, Palma DA. Prognostic and predictive value of epigenetic silencing of MGMT in patients with high grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2011; 105 (02) 325-335
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Idrees R, Fatima S, Abdul-Ghafar J, Raheem A, Ahmad Z. Cancer prevalence in Pakistan: meta-analysis of various published studies to determine variation in cancer figures resulting from marked population heterogeneity in different parts of the country. World J Surg Oncol 2018; 16 (01) 129
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Qasim I, Ahmad B, Khan MA. et al. Pakistan Genetic Mutation Database (PGMD); a centralized Pakistani mutome data source. Eur J Med Genet 2018; 61 (04) 204-208
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Qureshi MA, Mirza T, Khan S. et al. Cancer patterns in Karachi (all districts), Pakistan: first results (2010-2015) from a pathology based cancer registry of the largest government-run diagnostic and reference center of Karachi. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 44: 114-122
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Bhurgri Y. Karachi cancer registry data–implications for the national cancer control program of Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2004; 5 (01) 77-82
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Ang SYL, Lee L, See AAQ, Ang TY, Ang BT, King NKK. Incidence of biomarkers in high-grade gliomas and their impact on survival in a diverse SouthEast Asian cohort - a population-based study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20 (01) 79
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Schwartz AG. Racial differences in survival after diagnosis with primary malignant brain tumor. Cancer 2003; 98 (03) 603-609
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Maldonado JL, Williams VL. et al. Racial/ethnic differences in survival among elderly patients with a primary glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2007; 85 (02) 171-180
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Gabriel A, Batey J, Capogreco J. et al. Adult brain cancer in the U.S. black population: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis of incidence, survival, and trends. Med Sci Monit 2014; 20: 1510-1517
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Pan IW, Ferguson SD, Lam S. Patient and treatment factors associated with survival among adult glioblastoma patients: a USA population-based study from 2000-2010. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22 (10) 1575-1581
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Strobel H, Baisch T, Fitzel R. et al. Temozolomide and other alkylating agents in glioblastoma therapy. Biomedicines 2019; 7 (03) 69
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Chang SM, Barker II FG. Marital status, treatment, and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a population based study. Cancer 2005; 104 (09) 1975-1984
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 NIH. Markey Cancer Center: University of Kentucky Cancer Center. Accessed: May 4, 2020 at: https://www.cancer.gov/research/nci-role/cancer-centers/find/ukmarkey
  • 44 Jamshed A, Syed AA, Shah MA, Jamshed S. Improving cancer care in Pakistan. South Asian J Cancer 2013; 2 (01) 36-37
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Ahmad Z, Idrees R, Fatima S. et al. How our practice of histopathology, especially tumour pathology has changed in the last two decades: reflections from a major referral center in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15 (09) 3829-3849
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Yusuf A. Cancer care in Pakistan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013; 43 (08) 771-775
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Bhurgri Y, Bhurgri A, Hassan SH. et al. Cancer incidence in Karachi, Pakistan: first results from Karachi Cancer Registry. Int J Cancer 2000; 85 (03) 325-329
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar