CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2023; 58(01): 019-022
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750829
Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise
Ombro e Cotovelo

Impacts of the Delayed Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and its Repercussions for the Brazilian Unified Health System: Systematic Review Protocol

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
1   Departamento de Ortopedia, Divisão de Ortopedia Pediátrica, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
5   Departamento de Ortopedia e Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
,
2   Departamento de Fisioterapia, Divisão de Fisioterapia Neurofuncional, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
5   Departamento de Ortopedia e Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
,
3   Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (UNAERP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil
,
4   Departamento de Ortopedia, Divisão de Cirurgia da Coluna, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
5   Departamento de Ortopedia e Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
› Institutsangaben
Financial Support This project received a grant from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), process number 442639/2019–8. CNPq/MS/SCTIE/Decit Call number 27/2019–Research to strengthen the objectives and guidelines of the Care Network for People with Disabilities within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Thematic line 3: Assessment of the health status of people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its repercussions for SUS.

Abstract

Surgical correction is an effective treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with deformities over 45°. In the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS, Sistema Único de Saúde), if the surgical procedure is indicated, the patients are placed on a waiting list and wait until the treatment can be performed. An extended waiting period can be harmful due to worsening symptoms and increased treatment costs. Additionally, it has negative effects on the mental health and quality of life of these patients. This paper is a systematic review protocol to answer the following question: “What is the impact of the delayed surgical correction of AIS considering costs and quality of life?” Collecting health status information is the first step to improve high complex public health actions. Future publications from this protocol may serve as a subsidy to point out potential priority criteria to enhance the global health of AIS patients and the management of Brazilian public health financial resources.

Authors Contribution

MDSP: data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; manuscript preparation.

TPS: data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation.

MLS: data acquisition.

CFPSH: study conception, design, and review


Work developed at Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 06. Oktober 2021

Angenommen: 12. Mai 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Juni 2022

© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • Referências

  • 1 Danielsson AJ. Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a tool for guidance in decision of surgery of curves above 50°. J Child Orthop 2013; 7 (01) 37-41
  • 2 Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Secretários de Saúde. Assistência de Média e Alta Complexidade no SUS, Conselho Nacional de Secretários de Saúde (CONASS), 2007. Acesso em: 15 de setembro de 2020 em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/colec_progestores_livro9.pdf
  • 3 Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D. National trends in spinal fusion for pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis: demographics, blood transfusions, and in-hospital outcomes. Spine 2014; 39 (14) 1144-1150
  • 4 Kim HJ, Cunningham ME, Boachie-Adjei O. Revision spine surgery to manage pediatric deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18 (12) 739-748
  • 5 Sucato DJ. Management of severe spinal deformity: scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine 2010; 35 (25) 2186-2192
  • 6 Lykissas MG, Crawford AH, Jain VV. Complications of surgical treatment of pediatric spinal deformities. Orthop Clin North Am 2013; 44 (03) 357-370 , ix
  • 7 Calman R, Smithers T, Rowan R. Impact of surgical waiting time on paediatric spinal deformity patients. ANZ J Surg 2013; 83 (12) 929-932
  • 8 Lima-Júnior PC, Pellegrino L, Caffaro MF, Meves R, Landim E, Avanzi O. Escoliose idiopática do adolescente (EIA): perfil clínico e radiográfico da lista de espera para tratamento cirúrgico em hospital terciário de alta complexidade do sistema público de saúde brasileiro. Coluna/Columna 2011; 10 (02) 111-115
  • 9 Oudhoff JP, Timmermans DR, Bijnen AB, van der Wal G. Waiting for elective general surgery: physical, psychological and social consequences. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74 (05) 361-367
  • 10 Tarrant RC, Queally JM, O'Loughlin PF, Sheeran P, Moore DP, Kiely PJ. Preoperative curves of greater magnitude (>70°) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are associated with increased surgical complexity, higher cost of surgical treatment and a delayed return to function. Ir J Med Sci 2016; 185 (02) 463-471
  • 11 Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane 2019
  • 12 McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 75: 40-46
  • 13 PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. [Acesso em: 05 de out. de 2020] from: < https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/>