CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2022; 17(02): 280-285
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751011
Original Article

A Factorial Analysis on Visual Outcomes of Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenoma

Ben Chat Fong Ng
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
,
Calvin Hoi-Kwan Mak
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
,
Chong Shing Yee Steffi
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
,
See Ka Wing
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
,
Tse Tat Shing
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
,
Cheung Fung Ching
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective Sellar lesions are possible reversible causes of vision loss. This study is to provide quantitative objective measurement of efficacy of surgery for non-functioning pituitary adenoma and discuss different factors that could affect visual outcome of non-functioning pituitary adenoma.

Method This is a single centre, retrospective study conducted at a tertiary neurosurgery referral centre. 108 cases of sellar tumors which underwent surgery during the 3-year period from early June 2015 to late May 2018 were reviewed. Pituitary adenoma that were non-functioning and without apoplexy at initial presentation were selected for the study. We have analyzed the correlation of different factors with the visual outcome, including the extent of vertical decompression in terms of change in tumor height post operation and the extent of lateral decompression in terms of change in Knosp grading. Visual outcome was represented by the visual impairment score (VIS), an integrated measurement of visual acuity and visual field deficit.

Results Preoperative absolute tumor height and supracarotid height correlated with preoperative VIS scale (p ≤ 0.01). Absolute Knosp grading correlates significantly with VA (p = 0.001) and VF (p ≤ 0.001) of that particular eye. Although most patients had an objective improvement in visual acuity (VA) (88%) and visual field (VF) (99%) after operation, a larger reduction in tumor height and successful Knosp downgrading after surgery is associated with better VIS improvement. (p = 0.025) Change in supracarotid height shows trend in correlating with change in VIS (p = 0.084).

Conclusion Height of tumor measured from genu of cavernous ICA correlates better with visual outcome than absolute tumor height. The extent of both vertical and lateral decompression of non-functioning pituitary adenoma are important determinants that lead to better visual outcome. As endoscopic approach is able to achieve a greater degree of lateral decompression, it is a preferred approach in pituitary surgery to achieve a better visual outcome.

Note

This paper was presented at the ACNS at ACNS-YNS Autumn Web Seminar 2021 on November 20, 2021.




Publication History

Article published online:
24 August 2022

© 2022. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Guo S, Wang Z, Kang X, Xin W, Li X. A meta-analysis of endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for non-functioning and functioning pituitary adenomas: comparisons of efficacy and safety. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 614382 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.614382.
  • 2 Møller MW, Andersen MS, Glintborg D. et al. Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a single centre study. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 21942 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78823-z.
  • 3 Gnanalingham KK, Bhattacharjee S, Pennington R, Ng J, Mendoza N. The time course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: predictive factors for a good outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76 (03) 415-419
  • 4 Sun M, Zhang ZQ, Ma CY, Chen SH, Chen XJ. Predictive factors of. visual function recovery after pituitary adenoma resection: a literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 2017; . Published. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.11.17.
  • 5 Yang Y, Bao Y, Xie S. et al. Identification of the extradural and intradural extension of pituitary adenomas to the suprasellar region: classification, surgical strategies, and outcomes. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 723513 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.723513.
  • 6 Knosp E, Kitz K, Steiner E, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with parasellar invasion. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1991; 53: 65-71
  • 7 Yu F, Afifi AA. Descriptive statistics in ophthalmic research. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147 (03) 389-391
  • 8 Fahlbusch R, Schott W. Pterional surgery of meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale: surgical results with special consideration of ophthalmological and endocrinological outcomes. J Neurosurg 2002; 96 (02) 235-243
  • 9 Cohen AR, Cooper PR, Kupersmith MJ, Flamm ES, Ransohoff J. Visual recovery after transsphenoidal removal of pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 1985; 17 (03) 446-452
  • 10 Lee GI, Park KA, Oh SY, Kong DS. Parafoveal and peripapillary perfusion predict visual field recovery in chiasmal compression due to pituitary tumors. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (03) 697 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030697.
  • 11 Lachowicz E, Lubiński W. The importance of the electrophysiological tests in the early diagnosis of ganglion cells and/or optic nerve dysfunction coexisting with pituitary adenoma: an overview. Doc Ophthalmol 2018; 137 (03) 193-202
  • 12 Muskens IS, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Briceno V. et al. Visual outcomes after endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary 2017; 20 (05) 539-552
  • 13 Goudakos JK, Markou KD, Georgalas C. Endoscopic versus microscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 2011; 36 (03) 212-220
  • 14 Sturgess I, Rudd AG, Shilling J. Unrecognized visual problems amongst residents of Part III Homes. Age Ageing 1994; 23 (01) 54-56
  • 15 Barzaghi LR, Medone M, Losa M, Bianchi S, Giovanelli M, Mortini P. Prognostic factors of visual field improvement after trans-sphenoidal approach for pituitary macroadenomas: review of the literature and analysis by quantitative method. Neurosurg Rev 2012; 35 (03) 369-378 , discussion 378–379
  • 16 Luomaranta T, Raappana A, Saarela V, Liinamaa MJ. Factors affecting the visual outcome of pituitary adenoma patients treated with endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. World Neurosurg 2017; 105: 422-431
  • 17 Jean W, Deklotz TR. Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Pituitary Tumor Resection. CSurgeries 2016; . Published. DOI: 10.17797//bdxmmtst16.
  • 18 Cennamo G, Solari D, Montorio D. et al. Early vascular modifications after endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery: the role of OCT-angiography. PLoS One 2020; 15 (10) e0241295 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241295.