Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(03): 218-225
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751292
Review Article

Lung, Pleural, and Mediastinal Biopsies: From Preprocedural Assessment to Technique and Management of Complications

Natasha Larocque
1   Department of Radiology, Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Olga R. Brook
2   Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Biopsies of the lung, pleura, and mediastinum play a crucial role in the workup of thoracic lesions. Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of thoracic lesions is a relatively safe and noninvasive way to obtain a pathologic diagnosis which is required to direct patient management. This article reviews how to safely perform image-guided biopsies of the lung, pleura, and mediastinum, from the preprocedural assessment to reviewing intraprocedural techniques, and how to avoid and manage complications.

Keywords

interventional radiology - percutaneous - lung biopsy - pleural biopsy - mediastinal biopsy

Disclosures

The authors have no grants, disclosures, or any other conflicts of interests to declare.




Publication History

Article published online:
31 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM. et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017; 284 (01) 228-243
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Tsukada H, Satou T, Iwashima A, Souma T. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided automated needle biopsy of lung nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (01) 239-243
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Priola AM, Priola SM, Cataldi A. et al. Accuracy of CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions: factors affecting diagnostic yield. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007; 112 (08) 1142-1159
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 de Margerie-Mellon C, de Bazelaire C, de Kerviler E. Image-guided biopsy in primary lung cancer: why, when and how. Diagn Interv Imaging 2016; 97 (10) 965-972
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JA. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: preprocedural evaluation and technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (05) W511-W51 4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Purandare NC, Kulkarni AV, Kulkarni SS. et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT-directed biopsy: does it offer incremental benefit?. Nucl Med Commun 2013; 34 (03) 203-210
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Park J, Park B, Lim JK. et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsy for small pleural lesions: diagnostic yield and impact of CT and ultrasound characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217 (03) 699-706
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Petranovic M, Gilman MD, Muniappan A. et al. Diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy for diagnosis of anterior mediastinal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205 (04) 774-779
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B. et al; Standards of Practice Committee, with Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Endorsement. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23 (06) 727-736
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Tavare AN, Hare SS, Miller FNA, Hammond CJ, Edey A, Devaraj A. A survey of UK percutaneous lung biopsy practice: current practices in the era of early detection, oncogenetic profiling, and targeted treatments. Clin Radiol 2018; 73 (09) 800-809
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C. et al; BTS. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax 2003; 58 (11) 920-936
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Haramati LB, Austin JH. Complications after CT-guided needle biopsy through aerated versus nonaerated lung. Radiology 1991; 181 (03) 778
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Anderson CL, Crespo JC, Lie TH. Risk of pneumothorax not increased by obstructive lung disease in percutaneous needle biopsy. Chest 1994; 105 (06) 1705-1708
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Fish GD, Stanley JH, Miller KS, Schabel SI, Sutherland SE. Postbiopsy pneumothorax: estimating the risk by chest radiography and pulmonary function tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150 (01) 71-74
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Miller KS, Fish GB, Stanley JH, Schabel SI. Prediction of pneumothorax rate in percutaneous needle aspiration of the lung. Chest 1988; 93 (04) 742-745
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Winokur RS, Pua BB, Sullivan BW, Madoff DC. Percutaneous lung biopsy: technique, efficacy, and complications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013; 30 (02) 121-127
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Mychajlowycz M, Alabousi A, Mironov O. Ultrasound- versus CT-guided subpleural lung and pleural biopsy: an analysis of wait times, procedure time, safety, and diagnostic adequacy. Can Assoc Radiol J 2021; 72 (04) 883-889
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Appel E, Dommaraju S, Camacho A. et al. Dependent lesion positioning at CT-guided lung biopsy to reduce risk of pneumothorax. Eur Radiol 2020; 30 (11) 6369-6375
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Huo YR, Chan MV, Habib AR, Lui I, Ridley L. Pneumothorax rates in CT-guided lung biopsies: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors. Br J Radiol 2020; 93 (1108): 20190866
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Drumm O, Joyce EA, de Blacam C. et al. CT-guided lung biopsy: effect of biopsy-side down position on pneumothorax and chest tube placement. Radiology 2019; 292 (01) 190-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Rozenblit AM, Tuvia J, Rozenblit GN, Klink A. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy using an ipsilateral dependent position. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174 (06) 1759-1764
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kinoshita F, Kato T, Sugiura K. et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy using a puncture site-down positioning technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (04) 926-932
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Beck KS, Kim TJ, Lee KY, Kim YK, Kang JH, Han DH. CT-guided coaxial biopsy of malignant lung lesions: are cores from 20-gauge needle adequate for histologic diagnosis and molecular analysis?. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11 (03) 753-765
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lim C, Lee KY, Kim YK, Ko JM, Han DH. CT-guided core biopsy of malignant lung lesions: how many needle passes are needed?. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2013; 57 (06) 652-656
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Anderson JM, Murchison J, Patel D. CT-guided lung biopsy: factors influencing diagnostic yield and complication rate. Clin Radiol 2003; 58 (10) 791-797
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Beslic S, Zukic F, Milisic S. Percutaneous transthoracic CT guided biopsies of lung lesions; fine needle aspiration biopsy versus core biopsy. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46 (01) 19-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Lin CY, Chang CC, Chu CY. et al. Computed tomography-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: predictors for diagnostic failure and tissue adequacy for molecular testing. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8: 650381
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Mei F, Bonifazi M, Rota M. et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of image-guided pleural biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiration 2021; 100 (01) 77-87
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Böcking A, Klose KC, Kyll HJ, Hauptmann S. Cytologic versus histologic evaluation of needle biopsy of the lung, hilum and mediastinum. Sensitivity, specificity and typing accuracy. Acta Cytol 1995; 39 (03) 463-471
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Chung F, Chan VW, Ong D. A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7 (06) 500-506
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Ah-Lan KC, Nakhaei M, Camacho A. et al. Safely shortening the observation time after CT-guided lung procedures. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18 (08) 1118-1127
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Huo YR, Chan MV, Habib AR, Lui I, Ridley L. Post-biopsy manoeuvres to reduce pneumothorax incidence in CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 42 (08) 1062-1072
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Clayton JD, Elicker BM, Ordovas KG, Kohi MP, Nguyen J, Naeger DM. Nonclotted blood patch technique reduces pneumothorax and chest tube placement rates after percutaneous lung biopsies. J Thorac Imaging 2016; 31 (04) 243-246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Ahrar JU, Gupta S, Ensor JE. et al. Efficacy of a self-expanding tract sealant device in the reduction of pneumothorax and chest tube placement rates after percutaneous lung biopsy: a matched controlled study using propensity score analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (02) 270-276
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Bae K, Ha JY, Jeon KN. Pneumothorax after CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: a comparison between immediate and delayed occurrence. PLoS One 2020; 15 (08) e0238107
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Choi CM, Um SW, Yoo CG. et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung. Chest 2004; 126 (05) 1516-1521
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Tam A, Singh P, Ensor JE. et al. Air travel after biopsy-related pneumothorax: is it safe to fly?. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22 (05) 595-602 .e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Loh SEK, Wu DDF, Venkatesh SK. et al. CT-guided thoracic biopsy: evaluating diagnostic yield and complications. Ann Acad Med Singap 2013; 42 (06) 285-290
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Cox JE, Chiles C, McManus CM, Aquino SL, Choplin RH. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology 1999; 212 (01) 165-168
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Tai R, Dunne RM, Trotman-Dickenson B. et al. Frequency and severity of pulmonary hemorrhage in patients undergoing percutaneous CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: single-institution experience of 1175 cases. Radiology 2016; 279 (01) 287-296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Yeow KM, Su IH, Pan KT. et al. Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding: multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsies. Chest 2004; 126 (03) 748-754
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Song YS, Park CM, Park KW. et al. Does antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of hemoptysis during percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of a pulmonary lesion?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (05) 1014-1019
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Tomiyama N, Yasuhara Y, Nakajima Y. et al. CT-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a survey of severe complication based on 9783 biopsies in Japan. Eur J Radiol 2006; 59 (01) 60-64
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Lee JH, Yoon SH, Hong H, Rho JY, Goo JM. Incidence, risk factors, and prognostic indicators of symptomatic air embolism after percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Eur Radiol 2021; 31 (04) 2022-2033
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar