Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1753457
Cerium Oxide Polishes Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic via a Chemical–Mechanical Process
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to evaluate the chemical–mechanical polishing (CMP) effect of cerium oxide (ceria [CeO2]) as an abrasive to polish lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Materials and Methods For the polishing experiment, 22 lithium disilicate glass ceramic samples were prepared, polished with sandpaper using a polishing machine, their surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a profilometer, and they were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10). The samples were polished for 30 seconds with ceria paste with different ratios of deionized water:ceria by weight: 1:0.5 (C0.5) and 1:1 (C1) according to their group and the Ra values were determined. The Ra measurement was repeated after an additional 30 seconds of polishing until 120 seconds of polishing had been performed. The surface images of the postpolishing (120 seconds) samples were obtained using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate the surface morphology. For the adsorption experiment, 10 lithium disilicate glass ceramic specimens were prepared and soaked in 50-mL deionized water. After 24 hours, the specimens were removed. Each liquid sample was divided in two halves. The first half was stored and ceria particles were added into the second half. After 24 hours, the solutions were filtered. The silicon concentration in the liquid samples was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry.
Statistical Analysis The difference in mean Ra value between groups was analyzed using two-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the difference in mean silica concentrations before and after adding ceria particles was analyzed using the paired t-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results Ra decreased as the ratio of ceria and polishing time increased. The surface morphology of the samples analyzed by SEM corresponded with their Ra values. The mean silicon concentration after adding ceria particles was significantly decreased (p < 0.05).
Conclusion Using a ceria-polishing paste to polish lithium disilicate glass ceramic generates a significantly smoother surface compared with baseline roughness. Moreover, CeO2 has a mechanical action and chemical reaction with lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Therefore, it can be used as a CMP paste to create a smooth surface.
Publication History
Article published online:
05 September 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 O'Brien W. Dental Materials and Their Selection. 4th ed.. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Pub. Co.; 2002: 160-167
- 2 Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13 (04) 258-269
- 3 Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112 (05) 1141-1150
- 4 Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Oper Dent 2012; 37 (06) 617-624
- 5 Juntavee N, Juntavee A, Phattharasophachai T. Biaxial flexural strength of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (03) 585-593
- 6 Rocío V, Valenzuela D. Surface roughness implant-retained mandibular bar and ball joint overdentures and adherence of microorganisms. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (04) 546-552
- 7 Beltrami R, Ceci M, De Pani G. et al. Effect of different surface finishing/polishing procedures on color stability of esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (01) 49-56
- 8 Krishnan M, Nalaskowski JW, Cook LM. Chemical mechanical planarization: slurry chemistry, materials, and mechanisms. Chem Rev 2010; 110 (01) 178-204
- 9 Jha AR. Rare Earth Materials: Properties and Applications. 1st ed.. Boca Raton, Florida: Taylor & Francis Group; 2014: 55-56 , 251–254
- 10 Cook LM. Chemical processes in glass polishing. J Non-Cryst Solids 1990; 120 (1–3): 152-171
- 11 Chen P, Shih H, Huang B, Hsu J. Catalytic-pad chemical kinetics model of CMP. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 2003; 6 (12) G140
- 12 Suratwala T, Feit M, Steele W. et al. Microscopic removal function and the relationship between slurry particle size distribution and workpiece roughness during pad polishing. J Am Ceram Soc 2013; 97 (01) 81-91
- 13 Scientific Documentation IPS E.Max CAD. Accessed June 8, 2022 at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiIuIuDrJ34AhVIwjgGHaxuDIMQFnoECAQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fpdf4pro.com%2Fcdn%2Fips-e-max-cad-englishrm-roe-dental-laboratory-2c975d.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2GaSHa__4L105OxkhYV4fu
- 14 Scientific documentation IPS e.max press. Schaan. Accessed June 8, 2022 at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/6354553/ips-emax-press-scientific-documentation-roe-dental-laboratory
- 15 Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011; 39 (Suppl. 01) e9-e17
- 16 Suratwala T, Steele W, Feit M. et al. Mechanism and simulation of removal rate and surface roughness during optical polishing of glasses. J Am Ceram Soc 2016; 99 (06) 1974-1984
- 17 Wang Y, Zhao Y, Jiang J, Li X, Bai J. Modeling effect of chemical-mechanical synergy on material removal at molecular scale in chemical mechanical polishing. Wear 2008; 265 (5–6): 721-728
- 18 Plakhova TV, Romanchuk AY, Yakunin SN. et al. Solubility of nanocrystalline cerium dioxide: experimental data and thermodynamic modeling. J Phys Chem C 2016; 120 (39) 22615-22626
- 19 Swain MV. Impact of oral fluids on dental ceramics: what is the clinical relevance?. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (01) 33-42
- 20 Nishiyama M, Takamisawa M, Ohashi M. A study of dental porcelain solubility–dissolving of component elements and resultant surface roughness and abrasion. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent 1983; 25 (04) 262-276
- 21 Suratwala T, Steele W, Wong L. et al. Chemistry and formation of the beilby layer during polishing of fused silica glass. J Am Ceram Soc 2015; 98 (08) 2395-2402
- 22 Osseo-Asare K. Surface chemical processes in chemical mechanical polishing. J Electrochem Soc 2002; 149 (12) G651
- 23 Onodera T, Takahashi H, Nomura S. First-principles molecular dynamics investigation of ceria/silica sliding interface toward functional materials design for chemical mechanical polishing process. Appl Surf Sci 2020; 530: 147259
- 24 Evans C, Paul E, Dornfeld D. et al. Material removal mechanisms in lapping and polishing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2003; 52 (02) 611-633
- 25 Sampurno Y, Sudargho F, Zhuang Y, Ashizawa T, Morishima H, Philipossian A. Effect of cerium oxide particle sizes in oxide chemical mechanical planarization. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 2009; 12 (06) H191
- 26 Peng W, Guan C, Li S. Material removal mechanism of ceria particles with different sizes in glass polishing. Opt Eng 2014; 53 (03) 035104
- 27 Kim E, Lee J, Park Y, Shin C, Yang J, Kim T. Shape classification of fumed silica abrasive and its effects on chemical mechanical polishing. Powder Technol 2021; 381: 451-458
- 28 Beri TH, Ling Y, Liu M, Hang W, Yuan J. Effect of rotational speed ratio between platen and work piece on lapping processes. Mach Sci Technol 2020; 24 (06) 1000-1015
- 29 Suphantharida P, Osseo-Asare K. Cerium oxide slurries in CMP. Electrophoretic mobility and adsorption investigations of ceria/silicate interaction. J Electrochem 2004; 151 (10) G658-G662
- 30 Limbach LK, Bereiter R, Müller E, Krebs R, Galli R, Stark WJ. Removal of oxide nanoparticles in a model wastewater treatment plant: influence of agglomeration and surfactants on clearing efficiency. Environ Sci Technol 2008; 42 (15) 5828-5833
- 31 Prakash V, Peralta-Videa J, Tripathi DK, Ma X, Sharma S. Recent insights into the impact, fate and transport of cerium oxide nanoparticles in the plant-soil continuum. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2021; 221: 112403
- 32 Donovan AR, Adams CD, Ma Y, Stephan C, Eichholz T, Shi H. Detection of zinc oxide and cerium dioxide nanoparticles during drinking water treatment by rapid single particle ICP-MS methods. Anal Bioanal Chem 2016; 408 (19) 5137-5145
- 33 Celardo I, Pedersen JZ, Traversa E, Ghibelli L. Pharmacological potential of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2011; 3 (04) 1411-1420
- 34 Singh KR, Nayak V, Sarkar T, Singh RP. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: properties, biosynthesis and biomedical application. RSC Advances 2020; 10 (45) 27194-27214