Low-Risk Antenatal Care Enhanced by Telemedicine: A Practical Guideline Model

Abstract

Objective To develop a protocol for hybrid low-risk prenatal care adapted to Brazilian guidelines, merging reduced face-to-face consultations and remote monitoring.

Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched on telemedicine and antenatal care perspectives and adaptation of the low-risk prenatal care protocols recommended by the Ministry of Health and by the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations.

Results Five relevant articles and three manuals were included in the review, for presented criteria to develop this clinical guideline. We identified, in these studies, that the schedule of consultations is unevenly distributed among the gestational trimesters, and ranges from 7 to 14 appointments. In general, the authors propose one to two appointments in the first trimester, two to three appointments in the second trimester, and two to six appointments in the third trimester. Only three studies included puerperal evaluations. The routine exams recommended show minimal variations among authors. To date, there are no validated Brazilian protocols for prenatal care by telemedicine. The included studies showed that pregnant women were satisfied with this form of care, and the outcomes of interest, except for hypertensive diseases, were similar between the groups exposed to traditional and hybrid prenatal care.

Conclusion The presented guideline comprises the Ministry of Health recommendations for low-risk prenatal care and reduces exposure to the hospital environment and care costs. A randomized clinical trial, to be developed by this group, will provide real-world data on safety, effectiveness, satisfaction, and costs.

Resumo

Objetivo Desenvolver uma diretriz clínica híbrida para atendimento pré-natal de baixo risco, mesclando consultas presenciais e remotas por telemedicina, adapta às recomendações brasileiras.

Métodos Revisão sistemática da literatura nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase e Cochrane e adaptação dos protocolos de atenção ao pré-natal de baixo risco preconizados pelo Ministério da Saúde e pela Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia.

Resultados Cinco artigos relevantes e três manuais foram incluídos na revisão por preencherem critérios para o desenvolvimento desta diretriz clínica. Nos estudos incluídos, identificou-se que o cronograma de consultas se distribui de forma desigual entre os trimestres gestacionais, variando entre 07 e 14 encontros. De forma geral, os autores propõem uma a duas consultas no primeiro trimestre, duas a três consultas no segundo trimestre e duas a seis consultas no terceiro trimestre. Somente três estudos incluíram avaliações puerperais. A rotina de exames preconizada apresenta mínimas variações entre os autores. Até o momento, não existem protocolos brasileiros validados para atendimento pré-natal por telemedicina. Os estudos incluídos evidenciaram a satisfação das gestantes em relação a esta forma de atendimento, e os desfechos de interesse, excetuando doenças hipertensivas, foi semelhante entre os grupos expostos ao pré-natal tradicional e ao pré-natal híbrido.

Conclusão A diretriz apresentada contempla as recomendações do Ministério da Saúde para atendimento pré-natal de gestantes de baixo risco, reduz a exposição ao ambiente hospitalar e os custos de atendimento. Seu emprego em um ensaio clínico randomizado, a ser desenvolvido por este grupo, proporcionará dados de mundo real, relativos à segurança, efetividade, satisfação e custos.

Keywords

prenatal care - telemedicine - teleconsultation - management guideline - systematic review

Palavras-chave

pré-natal - teleconsulta - telemedicina - diretriz clínica - revisão sistemática

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the study and were involved in the data collection, data analysis and/or interpretation. All authors also contributed to manuscript writing/substantive editing and review and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Publication History

Received: 02 February 2022

Accepted: 06 June 2022

Article published online:
19 July 2022

• References

• 1 Alves DS, Times VC, da Silva ÉMA, Melo PSA, Novaes MA. Advances in obstetric telemonitoring: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2020; 134: 104004
• 2 Krenitsky NM, Spiegelman J, Sutton D, Syeda S, Moroz L. Primed for a pandemic: Implementation of telehealth outpatient monitoring for women with mild COVID-19. Semin Perinatol 2020; 44 (07) 151285
• 3 Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Brown SD, Ehrlich SF, Tsai AL, Feng J. et al. A telehealth lifestyle intervention to reduce excess gestational weight gain in pregnant women with overweight or obesity (GLOW): a randomised, parallel-group, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020; 8 (06) 490-500
• 4 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 14]. Available from: Coronavirus 2019 https://www.acog.org/en/Clinical/ClinicalGuidance/PracticeAdvisory/Articles/2020/03/Novel
• 5 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Schedule of visits and use of telemedicine for routine antenatal care: a systematic review [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 14]. Available from: https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/routine-antenatal-care.pdf
• 6 Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. Atenção ao pré-natal de baixo risco [Internet]. Brasília (DF): Editora do Ministério da Saúde; 2012. . Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/cadernos_atencao_basica_32_prenatal.pdf
• 7 Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ. et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019
• 8 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000100
• 9 Cochrane Methods Bias. RoB 2: a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021 Sep 11]. Available from: https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials
• 10 Butler Tobah YS, LeBlanc A, Branda ME, Inselman JW, Morris MA, Ridgeway JL. et al. Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221 (06) 638.e1-638.e8
• 11 Pflugeisen BM, Mou J. Patient satisfaction with virtual obstetric care. Matern Child Health J 2017; 21 (07) 1544-1551
• 12 Pflugeisen BM, McCarren C, Poore S, Carlile M, Schroeder R. Virtual Visits: Managing prenatal care with modern technology. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2016; 41 (01) 24-30
• 13 Meza-Santibañez L, Novoa Rommy H, Torres-Osorio J, Jáuregui-Canchari V, Rodríguez-Hilario N, GuevaraRíos E. et al. Implementación de un modelo mixto de atención prenatal, presencial y virtual durante la pandemia COVID-19, en el Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal en Lima, Perú. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet 2021; 67 (02) 00004
• 14 Palmer KR, Tanner M, Davies-Tuck M, Rindt A, Papacostas K, Giles ML. et al. Widespread implementation of a low-cost telehealth service in the delivery of antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis. Lancet 2021; 398 (10294): 41-52
• 15 Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J. et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2 (06) e323-e333
• 16 Dunn J, Runge R, Snyder M. Wearables and the medical revolution. Per Med 2018; 15 (05) 429-448