Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 70(08): 616-622
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755469
Original Cardiovascular

Low-Dose Heparin Protocol in Type A Aortic Dissection Surgeries

Levent Mavioglu
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
,
Mehmet Karahan
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
,
Ertekin Utku Unal
2   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Erol Olcok Research and Training Hospital, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey
,
Ayla Ece Celikten
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
,
Asli Demir
3   Department of Anesthesiology, Ankara City Hospital Complex, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
,
Hakki Zafer Iscan
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
,
Mehmet Ali Ozatik
4   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective We aim to compare the heparin dose regimen in terms of bleeding, reoperation rate due to severe bleeding, and the amount of transfusion of the blood products in patients who underwent surgery for type A aortic dissection (TAAD).

Materials and Methods Between January 2018 and August 2021, 90 adult patients who underwent for TAAD were included. Primary outcome measures were postoperative bleeding amount and blood product transfusion requirements. Two different protocols performed in TAAD surgery in our clinic. In this pre- and postimplementation study, before October 2019, the standard-dose heparin protocol (SH group) was used and after November 2019, the low-dose heparin protocol (LH group) was used and two groups were compared. Mechanical ventilation duration, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, postoperative drainage volumes, blood product transfusions, reoperations due to bleeding, and in-hospital mortality rates were recorded.

Results The dosages of heparin and activated clotting time values, as well as the additional heparin requirement, were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.001). Standard-dose heparinization was needed only in 33.3% of patients in the LH group. In the SH group, postoperative total drainage and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion were significantly higher than the LH group (p = 0.036 and p = 0.046, respectively).

Conclusion We found that the low-dose heparin regimen resulted in significantly less postoperative total drainage and RBC transfusion requirement in patients who underwent for TAAD.

Central Message

Low-dose heparin regimen resulted in significantly less postoperative total drainage and red blood cell transfusion requirement in patients who underwent for type A aortic dissection.


Perspective Statement

In patients with a high risk of bleeding who will undergo cardiopulmonary bypass, the use of low-dose heparin can reduce the consumption of coagulation factors (such as thrombin, FXIa, FXa, and FIXa), and this phenomenon reduces the amount of bleeding after the operation.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 20 March 2022

Accepted: 12 July 2022

Article published online:
16 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Landenhed M, Engström G, Gottsäter A. et al. Risk profiles for aortic dissection and ruptured or surgically treated aneurysms: a prospective cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4 (01) e001513
  • 2 Zindovic I, Sjögren J, Bjursten H. et al. Predictors and impact of massive bleeding in acute type A aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2017; 24 (04) 498-505
  • 3 Unsworth-White MJ, Herriot A, Valencia O. et al. Resternotomy for bleeding after cardiac operation: a marker for increased morbidity and mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59 (03) 664-667
  • 4 ten Cate JW, Timmers H, Becker AE. Coagulopathy in ruptured or dissecting aortic aneurysms. Am J Med 1975; 59 (02) 171-176
  • 5 Fine NL, Applebaum J, Elguezabal A, Castleman L. Multiple coagulation defects in association with dissecting aneurysm. Arch Intern Med 1967; 119 (05) 522-526
  • 6 Aykut A, Sabuncu Ü, Demir ZA. et al. Heparin dose calculated according to lean body weight during on-pump heart surgery. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg 2018; 26 (04) 528-535
  • 7 Lobato RL, Despotis GJ, Levy JH, Shore-Lesserson LJ, Carlson MO, Bennett-Guerrero E. Anticoagulation management during cardiopulmonary bypass: a survey of 54 North American institutions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139 (06) 1665-1666
  • 8 Levy JH, Sniecinski RM. Activated clotting times, heparin responses, and antithrombin: have we been wrong all these years?. Anesth Analg 2010; 111 (04) 833-835
  • 9 Tempe DK, Khurana P. Optimal blood transfusion practice in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32 (06) 2743-2745
  • 10 Mazer CD, Whitlock RP, Fergusson DA. et al; TRICS Investigators and Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group. Restrictive or liberal red-cell transfusion for cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 (22) 2133-2144
  • 11 Pagano D, Milojevic M, Meesters MI. et al. 2017 EACTS/EACTA Guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 53 (01) 79-111
  • 12 Bull BS, Korpman RA, Huse WM, Briggs BD. Heparin therapy during extracorporeal circulation. I. Problems inherent in existing heparin protocols. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975; 69 (05) 674-684
  • 13 Young JA, Kisker CT, Doty DB. Adequate anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass determined by activated clotting time and the appearance of fibrin monomer. Ann Thorac Surg 1978; 26 (03) 231-240
  • 14 Shore-Lesserson L, Baker RA, Ferraris VA. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical Practice Guidelines-Anticoagulation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105 (02) 650-662
  • 15 Grima C. The effects of intermittent prebypass heparin dosing in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 2003; 18 (05) 283-289
  • 16 Shore-Lesserson L. Evidence based coagulation monitors: heparin monitoring, thromboelastography, and platelet function. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 9 (01) 41-52
  • 17 Machin D, Devine P. The effect of temperature and aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass on three different methods of activated clotting time measurement. J Extra Corpor Technol 2005; 37 (03) 265-271
  • 18 Schulman S, Bijsterveld NR. Anticoagulants and their reversal. Transfus Med Rev 2007; 21 (01) 37-48
  • 19 Fromes Y, Daghildjian K, Caumartin L. et al. A comparison of low vs conventional-dose heparin for minimal cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Anaesthesia 2011; 66 (06) 488-492
  • 20 Shuhaibar MN, Hargrove M, Millat MH, O'Donnell A, Aherne T. How much heparin do we really need to go on pump? A rethink of current practices. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26 (05) 947-950
  • 21 Garvin S, FitzGerald DC, Despotis G, Shekar P, Body SC. Heparin concentration-based anticoagulation for cardiac surgery fails to reliably predict heparin bolus dose requirements. Anesth Analg 2010; 111 (04) 849-855