Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757321
A Reliable Method for the Monitoring of Buried Free Flaps Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Abstract
Background In recent years, there has been a shift toward nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) techniques which often negates the need for reconstruction with exposed cutaneous donor flap tissues. Although techniques for the monitoring of buried flaps have been proposed, none have been able to provide the benefits that come with cutaneous monitoring via near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Therefore, we herein propose a novel method for monitoring deepithelialized flap tissues deep to the mastectomy flaps using NIRS technology.
Methods An NSM with free flap reconstruction was performed. The flap was designed with a skin island for placement of a cutaneous NIRS probe. Next, a silicone NIRS probe was placed on a deepithelialized portion of the flap under the mastectomy flap. The readings from this tunneled device were then compared to the control measurements obtained from the cutaneous NIRS monitor. This procedure was performed on three consecutive patients. The changes in StO2 recorded from both devices were compared using a paired, two-tailed Student's t-test.
Results During flap monitoring, there were no issues with probe dislodgement and signal quality averaged greater than 90. Furthermore, probe removal was easily accomplished at bedside. There was no harm to the mastectomy skin flaps by affixing the probe and the pocket which contained the probe quickly closed down after removal. Using the Student's t-test, a p-value of 0.995 was calculated indicating no statistically significant difference between the StO2 readings from the cutaneous and the tunneled probes.
Conclusion By using this novel method, NIRS technology can reliably be applied to the monitoring of buried free flap tissues. The proposed technique could be applied to a variety of flaps beyond the realm of breast reconstruction and may prove to be particularly useful in the setting of head and neck reconstruction. The results of this study suggest that high quality postoperative flap monitoring is possible without compromising the aesthetic result.
Publication History
Received: 31 March 2022
Accepted: 29 May 2022
Article published online:
10 November 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Chen Y, Shen Z, Shao Z, Yu P, Wu J. Free flap monitoring using near-infrared spectroscopy: a systemic review. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (05) 590-597
- 2 Whitaker IS, Pratt GF, Rozen WM. et al. Near infrared spectroscopy for monitoring flap viability following breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (03) 149-154
- 3 Keller A. Noninvasive tissue oximetry for flap monitoring: an initial study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2007; 23 (04) 189-197
- 4 Steele MH. Three-year experience using near infrared spectroscopy tissue oximetry monitoring of free tissue transfers. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (05) 540-545
- 5 Lohman RF, Langevin CJ, Bozkurt M, Kundu N, Djohan R. A prospective analysis of free flap monitoring techniques: physical examination, external Doppler, implantable Doppler, and tissue oximetry. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (01) 51-56
- 6 Carruthers KH, Tiwari P, Yoshida S, Kocak E. Inpatient flap monitoring after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: how long is long enough?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (09) 682-687
- 7 Sisco M, Yao KA. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: a contemporary perspective. J Surg Oncol 2016; 113 (08) 883-890
- 8 Levine SM, Snider C, Gerald G. et al. Buried flap reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: advancing toward single-stage breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (04) 489e-497e
- 9 Frey JD, Stranix JT, Chiodo MV. et al. Evolution in monitoring of free flap autologous breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: is there a best way?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (05) 1086-1093
- 10 Chang EI, Ibrahim A, Zhang H. et al. Deciphering the sensitivity and specificity of the implantable doppler probe in free flap monitoring. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (03) 971-976
- 11 Orcutt ST, O'Donoghue C, Smith P, Laronga C. Expanding eligibility criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy. South Med J 2017; 110 (10) 654-659
- 12 Revenaugh PC, Waters HH, Scharpf J, Knott PD, Fritz MA. Suprastomal cutaneous monitoring paddle for free flap reconstruction of laryngopharyngectomy defects. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (04) 287-291
- 13 Poder TG, Fortier PH. Implantable Doppler in monitoring free flaps: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a systematic review of the literature. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2013; 130 (02) 79-85
- 14 Keller A. A new diagnostic algorithm for early prediction of vascular compromise in 208 microsurgical flaps using tissue oxygen saturation measurements. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (05) 538-543