Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36(01): 029-036
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757563
Review Article

Coloanal Anastomosis

William Forrest Johnston
1   Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, Louisiana
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

The furthest extent of restorative proctectomy involves a colon to anal anastomosis in the deep pelvis. While the anastomosis can be challenging, it can allow the patient to avoid a permanent ostomy. Patient and surgeon preparation can improve patient outcomes. This article will describe the options, technical challenges, and anecdotal tips for coloanal anastomosis.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. Oktober 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 You YN, Hardiman KM, Bafford A. et al. On Behalf of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (09) 1191-1222
  • 2 Kazi M, Bhamre R, DeSouza A. et al. Long-term oncological outcomes of the sphincter preserving total mesorectal excision with varying distal resection margins. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123 (08) 1784-1791
  • 3 Benoist S, Panis Y, Boleslawski E, Hautefeuille P, Valleur P. Functional outcome after coloanal versus low colorectal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 1997; 185 (02) 114-119
  • 4 Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M. et al. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg 2013; 257 (01) 108-113
  • 5 Qin Q, Ma T, Deng Y. et al. Impact of preoperative radiotherapy on anastomotic leakage and stenosis after rectal cancer resection: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (10) 934-942
  • 6 Croese AD, Lonie JM, Trollope AF, Vangaveti VN, Ho YH. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome and systematic review of risk factors. Int J Surg 2018; 56: 234-241
  • 7 Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou LG. et al; LARS International Collaborative Group. International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (03) 274-284
  • 8 Giglia MD, Stein SL. Overlooked long-term complications of colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32 (03) 204-211
  • 9 Kiran RP, Murray AC, Chiuzan C, Estrada D, Forde K. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (03) 416-425 , discussion 423–425
  • 10 Zaman S, Mohamedahmed AYY, Ayeni AA. et al. Comparison of the colonic J-pouch versus straight (end-to-end) anastomosis following low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37 (04) 919-938
  • 11 Brown S, Margolin DA, Altom LK. et al. Morbidity following coloanal anastomosis: a comparison of colonic J-pouch vs straight anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61 (02) 156-161
  • 12 Ho YH, Brown S, Heah SM. et al. Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates. Ann Surg 2002; 236 (01) 49-55
  • 13 Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS. Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (02) CD006040
  • 14 Baker JW. Low end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis; description of technic. Arch Surg 1950; 61 (01) 143-157
  • 15 Tsunoda A, Kamiyama G, Narita K, Watanabe M, Nakao K, Kusano M. Prospective randomized trial for determination of optimum size of side limb in low anterior resection with side-to-end anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (09) 1572-1577
  • 16 Brisinda G, Vanella S, Cadeddu F. et al. End-to-end versus end-to-side stapled anastomoses after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2009; 99 (01) 75-79
  • 17 Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1986; 73 (02) 136-138
  • 18 Nakayama S, Hasegawa S, Nagayama S. et al. The importance of precompression time for secure stapling with a linear stapler. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (07) 2382-2386
  • 19 Cong JC, Chen CS, Ma MX, Xia ZX, Liu DS, Zhang FY. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16 (05) 353-358
  • 20 Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 1972; 65 (11) 975-976
  • 21 Hou S, Wang Q, Zhao S, Liu F, Guo P, Ye Y. Safety and efficacy of side-to-end anastomosis versus colonic J-pouch anastomosis in sphincter-preserving resections: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19 (01) 130
  • 22 Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2002; 89 (06) 704-708
  • 23 Turnbull Jr RB, Cuthbertson A. Abdominorectal pull-through resection for cancer and for Hirschsprung's disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 1961; 28: 109-115
  • 24 Biondo S, Trenti L, Espin E. et al; TURNBULL-BCN Study Group. Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2020; 155 (08) e201625
  • 25 Hallet J, Milot H, Drolet S, Desrosiers E, Grégoire RC, Bouchard A. The clinical results of the Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18 (06) 579-590
  • 26 Ramage L, Qiu S, Kontovounisios C, Tekkis P, Rasheed S, Tan E. A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for low anterior resection syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17 (09) 762-771