Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 43(06): 839-850
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757885
Review Article

Lung Cancer Screening

Elizabeth Lee
,
Ella A. Kazerooni

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States and globally with the majority of lung cancer cases attributable to cigarette smoking. Given the high societal and personal cost of a diagnosis of lung cancer including that most cases of lung cancer when diagnosed are found at a late stage, work over the past 40 years has aimed to detect lung cancer earlier when curative treatment is possible. Screening trials using chest radiography and sputum failed to show a reduction in lung cancer mortality however multiple studies using low dose CT have shown the ability to detect lung cancer early and a survival benefit to those screened. This review will discuss the history of lung cancer screening, current recommendations and screening guidelines, and implementation and components of a lung cancer screening program.



Publication History

Article published online:
28 November 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71 (03) 209-249
  • 2 International Agency for Research on Cancer. Accessed September 14, 2022 at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/15-Lung-fact-sheet.pdf
  • 3 Schabath MB, Cote ML. Cancer progress and priorities: lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28 (10) 1563-1579
  • 4 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71 (01) 7-33
  • 5 Potter AL, Rosenstein AL, Kiang MV. et al. Association of computed tomography screening with lung cancer stage shift and survival in the United States: quasi-experimental study. BMJ 2022; 376: e069008
  • 6 Vachani A, Carroll NM, Simoff MJ. et al. Stage migration and lung cancer incidence after initiation of low-dose CT screening. J Thorac Oncol 2022; ( epub ahead of print)
  • 7 Gierada DS, Black WC, Chiles C, Pinsky PF, Yankelevitz DF. Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: evidence from 2 decades of study. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2020; 2 (02) e190058
  • 8 Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD. et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (05) 395-409
  • 9 National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Lung cancer incidence and mortality with extended follow-up in the National Lung Screening Trial. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14 (10) 1732-1742
  • 10 de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA. et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (06) 503-513
  • 11 Tockman M. Survival and mortality from lung cancer in a screened population: The Johns Hopkins Study. Chest 1986; 89 (04) 324S-325S
  • 12 Melamed MR, Flehinger BJ, Zaman MB, Heelan RT, Perchick WA, Martini N. Screening for early lung cancer. Results of the memorial Sloan-Kettering study in New York. Chest 1984; 86 (01) 44-53
  • 13 Doria-Rose VP, Marcus PM, Szabo E, Tockman MS, Melamed MR, Prorok PC. Randomized controlled trials of the efficacy of lung cancer screening by sputum cytology revisited: a combined mortality analysis from the Johns Hopkins Lung Project and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Lung Study. Cancer 2009; 115 (21) 5007-5017
  • 14 Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Woolner LB, Taylor WF, Miller WE, Muhm JR. Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program. J Occup Med 1986; 28 (08) 746-750
  • 15 Kubik A, Parkin DM, Khlat M, Erban J, Polak J, Adamec M. Lack of benefit from semi-annual screening for cancer of the lung: follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high-risk males in Czechoslovakia. Int J Cancer 1990; 45 (01) 26-33
  • 16 Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA. et al; PLCO Project Team. Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA 2011; 306 (17) 1865-1873
  • 17 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF. et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354 (9173): 99-105
  • 18 New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project Investigators. CT screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project. Radiology 2007; 243 (01) 239-249
  • 19 Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH. et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011; 260 (03) 658-663
  • 20 Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR. et al; DANTE Study Group. Long-term follow-up results of the DANTE Trial, a randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 191 (10) 1166-1175
  • 21 Wille MMW, Dirksen A, Ashraf H. et al. Results of the rndomized Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with focus on high-risk profiling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193 (05) 542-551
  • 22 Pastorino U, Silva M, Sestini S. et al. Prolonged lung cancer screening reduced 10-year mortality in the MILD trial: new confirmation of lung cancer screening efficacy. Ann Oncol 2019; 30 (07) 1162-1169
  • 23 Moyer VA. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160 (05) 330-338
  • 24 Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM. et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021; 325 (10) 962-970
  • 25 Haiman CA, Stram DO, Wilkens LR. et al. Ethnic and racial differences in the smoking-related risk of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 (04) 333-342
  • 26 Aldrich MC, Mercaldo SF, Sandler KL, Blot WJ, Grogan EL, Blume JD. Evaluation of USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines among African American adult smokers. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5 (09) 1318-1324
  • 27 Kaplan RC, Bangdiwala SI, Barnhart JM. et al. Smoking among U.S. Hispanic/Latino adults: the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos. Am J Prev Med 2014; 46 (05) 496-506
  • 28 Bandiera FC, Assari S, Livaudais-Toman J, Pérez-Stable EJ. Latino and Black smokers in the Health and Retirement Study are more likely to quit: the role of light smoking. Tob Induc Dis 2016; 14: 23
  • 29 Trivedi AN, Rakowski W, Ayanian JZ. Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in Medicare health plans. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (04) 375-383
  • 30 Zhao J, Mao Z, Fedewa SA. et al. The affordable care act and access to care across the cancer control continuum: a review at 10 years. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70 (03) 165-181
  • 31 American Academy of Family Physicians. Clinical Preventive Service Recommendation: Lung Cancer Screening, Adult, 2021. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.aafp.org/family-physician/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all-clinical-recommendations/lung-cancer.html
  • 32 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Lung Cancer Screening V2.2022, July 19 2022. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
  • 33 Tindle HA, Duncan MS, Greevy RA. et al. Lifetime smoking history and risk of lung cancer: results from the Framingham Heart Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110 (11) 1201-1207
  • 34 Ebbert JO, Yang P, Vachon CM. et al. Lung cancer risk reduction after smoking cessation: observations from a prospective cohort of women. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21 (05) 921-926
  • 35 Silvestri GA, Goldman L, Burleson J. et al. Characteristics of Persons Screened for Lung Cancer in the United States. Ann Int Med 2022; (e-pub ahead of print)
  • 36 Sahar L, Wills VLD, Liu KKA. et al. Geographic access to lung cancer screening among eligible adults living in rural and urban environments in the United States. Cancer 2022; 128 (08) 1584-1594
  • 37 Wiener RS, Gould MK, Arenberg DA. et al; ATS/ACCP Committee on Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice. An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192 (07) 881-891
  • 38 Klabunde CN, Marcus PM, Silvestri GA. et al. U.S. primary care physicians' lung cancer screening beliefs and recommendations. Am J Prev Med 2010; 39 (05) 411-420
  • 39 Klabunde CN, Marcus PM, Han PKJ. et al. Lung cancer screening practices of primary care physicians: results from a national survey. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10 (02) 102-110
  • 40 Coughlin JM, Zang Y, Terranella S. et al. Understanding barriers to lung cancer screening in primary care. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12 (05) 2536-2544
  • 41 Ahsan A, Zimmerman E, Rodriguez EM. et al. Examining lung cancer screening behaviors in the primary care setting: a mixed methods approach. J Cancer Treat Res 2019; 7 (01) 1-8
  • 42 Triplette M, Wenger DS, Shahrir S. et al. Patient identification of lung cancer screening follow-up recommendations and the association with adherence. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19 (05) 799-806
  • 43 Hansberry DR, White MD, D'Angelo M. et al. Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines: how readable are internet-based patient education resources?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (01) W42-W46
  • 44 Haas K, Brillante C, Sharp L. et al. Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources. BMC Public Health 2018; 18 (01) 1356
  • 45 GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer, Care Continuum Centers of Excellence (CCCOE). Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://go2foundation.org/treatments-and-side-effects/centers-of-excellence/
  • 46 American College of Radiology Lung Cancer Screening Resources. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Lung-Cancer-Screening-Resources
  • 47 Sakoda LC, Rivera MP, Zhang J. et al. Patterns and factors associated with adherence to lung cancer screening in diverse practice settings. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (04) e218559
  • 48 Geber DE, Gillam AO, Hamann HA. Lung cancer screening in the “real world” and the role of nurse navigators. J Oncol Navig Surviv 2013;04(02)
  • 49 Hoopes SM, Weathers J, Perkins L. et al. The importance of nurse navigation in lung cancer screening. J Oncol Navig Surviv 2018;9(11)
  • 50 Shusted CS, Barta JA, Lake M. et al. The case for patient navigation in lung cancer screening in vulnerable populations: a systematic review. Popul Health Manag 2019; 22 (04) 347-361
  • 51 Christie J, Itzkowitz S, Lihau-Nkanza I, Castillo A, Redd W, Jandorf L. A randomized controlled trial using patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income minorities. J Natl Med Assoc 2008; 100 (03) 278-284
  • 52 Kunos CA, Olszewski S, Espinal E. Impact of nurse navigation on timeliness of diagnostic medical services in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. J Community Support Oncol 2015; 13 (06) 219-224
  • 53 Alsamarai S, Yao X, Cain HC. et al. The effect of a lung cancer care coordination program on timeliness of care. Clin Lung Cancer 2013; 14 (05) 527-534
  • 54 Braun KL, Thomas Jr. WL, Domingo JL. et al. Reducing cancer screening disparities in medicare beneficiaries through cancer patient navigation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63 (02) 365-370
  • 55 Patient Navigator Training Collaborative. Lung Cancer Screening Course for Patient Navigators. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://patientnavigatortraining.org/elearning/courses/lung-cancer-screening/
  • 56 Spalluto LB, Lewis JA, LaBaze S. et al. Association of a lung screening program coordinator with adherence to annual CT lung screening at a large academic institution. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17 (02) 208-215
  • 57 Gilbert CR, Ely R, Fathi JT. et al. The economic impact of a nurse practitioner-directed lung cancer screening, incidental pulmonary nodule, and tobacco-cessation clinic. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155 (01) 416-424
  • 58 Fathi JT, White CS, Greenberg GM, Mazzone PJ, Smith RA, Thomson CC. The integral role of the electronic health record and tracking software in the implementation of lung cancer screening—a call to action to developers: a white paper from the National Lung Cancer Roundtable. Chest 2020; 157 (06) 1674-1679
  • 59 LungPlan Overview. National Lung Cancer Roundtable at the American Cancer Society. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://nlcrt.org/lungplan-overview/
  • 60 American College of Radiology-Society of Thoracic Radiology practice parameter for the performance and reporting of lung cancer screening thoracic computed tomography (CT) 2019. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/CT-LungCaScr.pdf accessed on line 9/15/2022
  • 61 Lung Cancer Screening CT Protocols Version 5.1 13 September 2019. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.aapm.org/pubs/ctprotocols/documents/lungcancerscreeningct.pdf
  • 62 Kawel N, Seifert B, Luetolf M, Boehm T. Effect of slab thickness on the CT detection of pulmonary nodules: use of sliding thin-slab maximum intensity projection and volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192 (05) 1324-1329
  • 63 Rubin GD. Lung nodule and cancer detection in computed tomography screening. J Thorac Imaging 2015; 30 (02) 130-138
  • 64 Yip R, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Smith JP. CT screening for lung cancer: alternative definitions of positive test result based on the national lung screening trial and international early lung cancer action program databases. Radiology 2014; 273 (02) 591-596
  • 65 Lung CT Screening reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS). Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Lung-Rads
  • 66 Han D, Heuvelmans MA, Oudkerk M. Volume versus diameter assessment of small pulmonary nodules in CT lung cancer screening. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2017; 6 (01) 52-61
  • 67 Kauczor HU, Baird AM, Blum TG. et al; European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening. Eur Respir J 2020; 55 (02) 190050
  • 68 Hammer MM, Byrne SC. Cancer risk in nodules detected at follow-up lung cancer screening CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 218 (04) 634-641
  • 69 de Hoop B, van Ginneken B, Gietema H, Prokop M. Pulmonary perifissural nodules on CT scans: rapid growth is not a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 2012; 265 (02) 611-616
  • 70 Xu DM, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Oudkerk M. et al. Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up. Radiology 2009; 250 (01) 264-272
  • 71 Zhu Y, Yip R, You N, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF. Management of nodules attached to the costal pleura at low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. Radiology 2020; 297 (03) 710-718
  • 72 Zhu Y, Cai Q, Yip R. et al. Radiologic features of nodules attached to the mediastinal or diaphragmatic pleura. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 2022 World Congress on Lung Cancer, EP01.05–011, abstract book page 371; Accessed September 30, 2022 at: https://wclc2022.iaslc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/WCLC2022-Abstract-Book.pdf%20access%209/15/2022
  • 73 Henschke CI. International Early Lung Cancer Action Program: Screening Protocol, January 15, 2022. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.ielcap.org/sites/default/files/I-ELCAP-protocol.pdf
  • 74 Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H. et al. Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 2006; 54 (02) 177-184
  • 75 Dyer DS, Gieske MR, Kazerooni EA. et al. A quick reference guide for incidental findings on lung cancer screening CT examinations. Journal of the American College of Radiology In Press. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Lung-Cancer-Screening-Resources/LCS-Incidental-Findings-Quick-Guide.pdf
  • 76 Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK. et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA 2012; 307 (22) 2418-2429
  • 77 Mazzone PJ, White CS, Kazerooni EA, Smith RA, Thomson CC. Proposed quality metrics for lung cancer screening programs: a national lung cancer roundtable project. Chest 2021; 160 (01) 368-378
  • 78 The American College of Radiology Lung Cancer Screening Registry. American College of Radiology. Accessed September 15, 2022 at: https://www.acr.org/Practice-Management-Quality-Informatics/Registries/Lung-Cancer-Screening-Registry