Comparison of Gingival Recession of Mandibular Incisors of Class III Patients Immediately after Compensatory or Surgical Orthodontic Treatment

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to compare gingival recession in mandibular anterior teeth in patients with Class III malocclusion, immediately after compensatory or surgical orthodontic treatment.

Materials and Methods The sample consisted of 40 patients with Class III malocclusion, divided into two groups: Group 1 (compensatory), 20 patients treated with compensatory orthodontics, with a mean initial age of 20.26 years (standard deviation [SD] . = 7.44), mean final age of 23.07 years (SD = 7.32), and mean treatment time of 2.81 years (SD =0.84). Group 2 (surgical), who undergone orthodontic–surgical treatment, with a mean initial age of 23.08 years (SD =5.48), mean final age of 25.43 years (SD =5.12), and mean treatment time of 2.35 years (SD =1.56). Intraoral photographs taken before and after removal of the fixed orthodontic appliance were used to measure the gingival recession, from the cervical of the mandibular incisors from the most cervical point of the gingival margin to the cementoenamel junction. In the initial and final cephalograms, the position of the mandibular incisors was measured. The intergroup comparison was performed using the independent t-test.

Results The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the gingival recession at the beginning, at the end, and of changes with treatment between the compensatory and surgical groups.

Conclusion It was concluded that the compensatory and surgical orthodontic treatments for Class III malocclusion showed similar results regarding the gingival recession of the mandibular incisors.

Keywords

Class III malocclusion - gingival recession - corrective orthodontics - orthognathic surgery

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Dezember 2022

• References

• 1 Daprile G, Gatto MR, Checchi L. The evolution of buccal gingival recessions in a student population: a 5-year follow-up. J Periodontol 2007; 78 (04) 611-614
• 2 Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134 (02) 220-225
• 3 Khocht A, Simon G, Person P, Denepitiya JL. Gingival recession in relation to history of hard toothbrush use. J Periodontol 1993; 64 (09) 900-905
• 4 Morris JW, Campbell PM, Tadlock LP, Boley J, Buschang PH. Prevalence of gingival recession after orthodontic tooth movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151 (05) 851-859
• 5 Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. Saint Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011
• 6 Slutzkey S, Levin L. Gingival recession in young adults: occurrence, severity, and relationship to past orthodontic treatment and oral piercing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134 (05) 652-656
• 7 Heasman PA, Holliday R, Bryant A, Preshaw PM. Evidence for the occurrence of gingival recession and non-carious cervical lesions as a consequence of traumatic toothbrushing. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42 (Suppl. 16) S237-S255
• 8 Albandar JM, Kingman A. Gingival recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994. J Periodontol 1999; 70 (01) 30-43
• 9 Geiger AM. Malocclusion as an etiologic factor in periodontal disease: a retrospective essay. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120 (02) 112-115
• 10 Löe H, Anerud A, Boysen H. The natural history of periodontal disease in man: prevalence, severity, and extent of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1992; 63 (06) 489-495
• 11 Allais D, Melsen B. Does labial movement of lower incisors influence the level of the gingival margin? A case-control study of adult orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25 (04) 343-352
• 12 Janson G, Bombonatti R, Brandão AG, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR. Comparative radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone crest after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124 (02) 157-164
• 13 Nahás ACR, Freitas MR, Nahás D, Janson JRP, Henriques JFC. The interrelationship of orthodontics and periodontics in the prevention and control of the gingival recessions decorrent to orthodontic treatment. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial 2000; 5: 51-56
• 14 Janson G, Caldas W, Fomçatti CS, Fiedler C, Garib DG. Stability of non-surgical treatment of Class III. Orthod Sci Pract 2016; 9: 203-212
• 15 Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129 (04) 469.e1-469.e32
• 16 Artun J, Krogstad O. Periodontal status of mandibular incisors following excessive proclination. A study in adults with surgically treated mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91 (03) 225-232
• 17 Burns NR, Musich DR, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Class III camouflage treatment: what are the limits?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137 (01) 9.e1-9.e13 , discussion 9–11
• 18 Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Lux CJ, Schuster G. Treatment decision in adult patients with Class III malocclusion: orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122 (01) 27-37 , discussion 37–38
• 19 Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103 (04) 299-312
• 20 Furquim BA, de Freitas KM, Janson G, Simoneti LF, de Freitas MR, de Freitas DS. Class III malocclusion surgical-orthodontic treatment. Case Rep Dent 2014; 2014: 868390
• 21 Yared KF, Zenobio EG, Pacheco W. Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130 (01) 6.e1-6.e8
• 22 Hollender L, Rönnerman A, Thilander B. Root resorption, marginal bone support and clinical crown length in orthodontically treated patients. Eur J Orthod 1980; 2 (04) 197-205
• 23 Melsen B, Allais D. Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127 (05) 552-561 , quiz 625
• 24 Closs LQ, Grehs B, Raveli DB, Rösing CK. Occurrence, extension, and severity of gingival margin alterations after orthodontic treatment. World J Orthod 2008; 9 (03) e1-e6
• 25 Lin J, Gu Y. Preliminary investigation of nonsurgical treatment of severe skeletal Class III malocclusion in the permanent dentition. Angle Orthod 2003; 73 (04) 401-410
• 26 Lee KM, Kim YI, Park SB, Son WS. Alveolar bone loss around lower incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment in mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 2012; 82 (04) 637-644
• 27 Steiner GG, Pearson JK, Ainamo J. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol 1981; 52 (06) 314-320
• 28 Rabie AB, Wong RW, Min GU. Treatment in borderline Class III Malocclusion: orthodontic camouflage (extraction) versus orthognathic surgery. Open Dent J 2008; 2: 38-48
• 29 Watanabe JH, Fitarelli F, de Freitas DS. et al. Comparison of the facial profile attractiveness in Class III borderline patients after surgical or compensatory orthodontic treatment. J Clin Exp Dent 2020; 12 (04) e348-e353
• 30 Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Periodontal consequences of mandibular incisor proclination during presurgical orthodontic treatment in Class III malocclusion patients. Angle Orthod 2015; 85 (03) 427-433
• 31 Colet R, Cotrin P, Oliveira RC. et al. Gingival recession in mandibular anterior teeth in Class II patients treated with elastics and Twin Force appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2022; 162 (04) 529-537
• 32 De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36 (05) 428-433
• 33 Eghbali A, De Rouck T, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36 (11) 958-963
• 34 Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975; 68 (05) 554-563
• 35 Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciğer S, Ariyürek M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122 (01) 15-26
• 36 Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1972; 42 (01) 26-34
• 37 Boyd RL, Leggott PJ, Quinn RS, Eakle WS, Chambers D. Periodontal implications of orthodontic treatment in adults with reduced or normal periodontal tissues versus those of adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96 (03) 191-198
• 38 Djeu G, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. Correlation between mandibular central incisor proclination and gingival recession during fixed appliance therapy. Angle Orthod 2002; 72 (03) 238-245
• 39 Renkema AM, Fudalej PS, Renkema A, Kiekens R, Katsaros C. Development of labial gingival recessions in orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143 (02) 206-212
• 40 Janson G, Sathler R, Fernandes TM, Branco NC, Freitas MR. Correction of Class II malocclusion with Class II elastics: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143 (03) 383-392
• 41 Janson G, de Souza JEP, Alves FdeA. et al. Extreme dentoalveolar compensation in the treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128 (06) 787-794
• 42 Aziz T, Flores-Mir C. A systematic review of the association between appliance-induced labial movement of mandibular incisors and gingival recession. Aust Orthod J 2011; 27 (01) 33-39
• 43 Parfitt G, Mjö RI. A clinical evaluation of localized gingival recession in children. ASDC J Dent Child 1964; 31: 257-262
• 44 Wennström JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, Thilander B. Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14 (03) 121-129