Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(06): 453-461
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758188
Original Article

Intraoperative Ergonomic Assessment of Exoscopes versus Conventional DIEP Flap

Tianke Wang
1   Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Hamid Norasi
1   Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
2   Division of Healthcare Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Minh-Doan Nguyen
3   Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Christin Harless
3   Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Katherine E. Law
1   Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
2   Division of Healthcare Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Tianqi G. Smith
1   Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Emmanuel Tetteh
1   Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
2   Division of Healthcare Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Susan Hallbeck
1   Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
2   Division of Healthcare Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
3   Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was funded by a research grant from Olympus, which included a loan of equipment. Olympus had no involvement in the study execution or interpretation of results.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background This study compared the ergonomics of surgeons during deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery using either baseline equipment (loupes, headlights, and an operating microscope) or an exoscope. Plastic surgeons may be at high risk of musculoskeletal problems. Recent studies indicate that adopting an exoscope may significantly improve surgeon postures and ergonomics.

Methods Postural exposures, using inertial measurement units at the neck, torso, and shoulders, were calculated in addition to the surgeons' subjective physical and cognitive workload. An ergonomic risk score on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest) was calculated for each of the postures observed. Data from 23 bilateral DIEP flap surgeries (10 baseline and 13 exoscope) were collected.

Results The neck and torso risk scores decreased significantly during abdominal flap harvest and chest dissection, while right shoulder risk scores increased during the abdominal flap harvest for exoscope DIEP flap procedures compared with. Exoscope anastomoses demonstrated higher neck, right shoulder, and left shoulder risk scores. The results from the survey for the “surgeon at abdomen” showed that the usage of exoscopes was associated with decreased performance and increased mental demand, temporal demand, and effort. However, the results from the “surgeon at chest” showed that the usage of exoscopes was associated with lower physical demand and fatigue, potentially due to differences in surgeon preference.

Conclusion Our study revealed some objective evidence for the ergonomic benefits of exoscope; however, this is dependent on the tasks the surgeon is performing. Additionally, personal preferences may be an important factor to be considered in the ergonomic evaluation of the exoscope.

Keywords

exoscope - plastic surgery - ergonomics - postural exposure - inertial measurement unit

Disclosures

Olympus had no involvement in the study execution or interpretation of results.




Publication History

Received: 19 April 2022

Accepted: 17 September 2022

Article published online:
12 December 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Damodaran O, Lee J, Lee G. Microscope in modern spinal surgery: advantages, ergonomics and limitations. ANZ J Surg 2013; 83 (04) 211-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Epstein S, Sparer EH, Tran BN. et al. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons and interventionalists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2018; 153 (02) e174947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Davis WT, Fletcher SA, Guillamondegui OD. Musculoskeletal occupational injury among surgeons: effects for patients, providers, and institutions. J Surg Res 2014; 189 (02) 207-212.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sergesketter AR, Lubkin DT, Shammas RL. et al. The impact of ergonomics on recruitment to surgical fields: a multi-institutional survey study. J Surg Res 2019; 236: 238-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Meltzer AJ, Hallbeck MS, Morrow MM. et al. Measuring ergonomic risk in operating surgeons by using wearable technology. JAMA Surg 2020; 155 (05) 444-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Yang L, Money SR, Morrow MM. et al. Impact of procedure type, case duration, and adjunctive equipment on surgeon intraoperative musculoskeletal discomfort. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230 (04) 554-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yang L, Wang T, Weidner TK, Madura II JA, Morrow MM, Hallbeck MS. Intraoperative musculoskeletal discomfort and risk for surgeons during open and laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (11) 6335-6343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Norasi H, Tetteh E, Money SR. et al. Intraoperative posture and workload assessment in vascular surgery. Appl Ergon 2021; 92: 103344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nimbarte AD, Sivak-Callcott JA, Zreiqat M, Chapman M. Neck postures and cervical spine loading among microsurgeons operating with loupes and headlamp. IEE Trans Occup 2013; 1 (04) 215-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lakhiani C, Fisher SM, Janhofer DE, Song DH. Ergonomics in microsurgery. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118 (05) 840-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sivak-Callcott JA, Diaz SR, Ducatman AM, Rosen CL, Nimbarte AD, Sedgeman JA. A survey study of occupational pain and injury in ophthalmic plastic surgeons. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 27 (01) 28-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Khansa I, Khansa L, Westvik TS, Ahmad J, Lista F, Janis JE. Work-related musculoskeletal injuries in plastic surgeons in the United States, Canada, and Norway. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 165e-175e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Howarth AL, Hallbeck S, Mahabir RC, Lemaine V, Evans GRD, Noland SS. Work-related musculoskeletal discomfort and injury in microsurgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (05) 322-328
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kokosis G, Dellon LA, Lidsky ME, Hollenbeck ST, Lee BT, Coon D. Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and ergonomics among plastic surgery residents: results of a national survey and analysis of contributing factors. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (03) 310-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yu D, Green C, Kasten SJ, Sackllah ME, Armstrong TJ. Effect of alternative video displays on postures, perceived effort, and performance during microsurgery skill tasks. Appl Ergon 2016; 53 (Pt A): 281-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ahmad FI, Mericli AF, DeFazio MV. et al. Application of the ORBEYE three-dimensional exoscope for microsurgical procedures. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (04) 468-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Garneau JC, Laitman BM, Cosetti MK, Hadjipanayis C, Wanna G. The use of the exoscope in lateral skull base surgery: advantages and limitations. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40 (02) 236-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Murai Y, Sato S, Yui K. et al. Preliminary clinical microneurosurgical experience with the 4K3-dimensional microvideoscope (ORBEYE) system for microneurological surgery: observation study. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019; 16 (06) 707-716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Amoo M, Henry J, Javadpour M. Beyond magnification and illumination: preliminary clinical experience with the 4K 3D ORBEYE™ exoscope and a literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163 (08) 2107-2115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ariffin MHM, Ibrahim K, Baharudin A, Tamil AM. Early experience, setup, learning curve, benefits, and complications associated with exoscope and three-dimensional 4K hybrid digital visualizations in minimally invasive spine surgery. Asian Spine J 2020; 14 (01) 59-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shimizu T, Toyota S, Nakagawa K. et al. Retrosigmoid approach in the supine position using ORBEYE: a consecutive series of 14 cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2021; 61 (01) 55-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kwan K, Schneider JR, Du V. et al. Lessons learned using a high-definition 3-dimensional exoscope for spinal surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019; 16 (05) 619-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Human Mental Workload. Oxford; North-Holland: 1988: 139-183
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 2011; 35 (09) 1961-1969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG. et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005; 190 (01) 107-113
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Borg GAV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14 (05) 377-381
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Morrow MMB, Lowndes B, Fortune E, Kaufman KR, Hallbeck MS. Validation of inertial measurement units for upper body kinematics. J Appl Biomech 2017; 33 (03) 227-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McAtamney L, Nigel Corlett E. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 1993; 24 (02) 91-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wang T, Law KE, Harless C, Nguyen M-D, Hallbeck MS. Surgeon postures during deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction procedures: a pilot study. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 2020; 64 (01) 632-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Liu N, Greenberg JA. Robotics vs laparoscopy-are they truly rivals?. JAMA Surg 2020; 155 (05) 388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Moschovas MC, Bhat S, Sandri M. et al. Comparing the approach to radical prostatectomy using the multiport da Vinci Xi and da Vinci SP robots: a propensity score analysis of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol 2021; 79 (03) 393-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar