PDF icon PDF herunterladen
Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2023; 58(03): 443-448
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758368
Artigo Original
Joelho

Microbiological Profile of Periprosthetic Knee Infections in a Brazilian Unified Health System Hospital Specialized in Highly Complex Orthopedic Surgeries[*]

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
Alan de Paula Mozella 
1   Centro de Cirurgia do Joelho, Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
,
Thales Nunes de Assunção 
1   Centro de Cirurgia do Joelho, Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
,
Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros Cobra 
1   Centro de Cirurgia do Joelho, Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
,
Sandra Tie Nishibe Minamoto 
1   Centro de Cirurgia do Joelho, Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
,
Rodrigo Salim 
2   Departamento de Ortopedia e Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (USP-RP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
Ana Carolina Leal 
3   Divisão de Ensino e Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
› Institutsangaben

Financial Support There was no financial support from public, commercial, or nonprofit sources.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar aufeRef
  Lizenzen und Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Objective We studied the microbiological profile of periprosthetic knee infections treated in a Brazilian tertiary hospital.

Methods The study included all patients undergoing revision surgery for total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) between November 2019 and December 2021, with a diagnosis of periprosthetic infection confirmed per the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria.

Results Sixty-two patients had a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) per the 2018 ICM criteria. Cultures were monomicrobial in 79% and polymicrobial in 21% of cases. The most frequent bacterium in microbiological tissue and synovial fluid cultures was Staphylococcus aureus, observed in 26% of PJI patients. Periprosthetic joint infection with negative cultures occurred in 23% of patients.

Conclusion Our results show the following: i) a high prevalence of Staphylococcus as an etiological agent for knee PJI; ii) a high incidence of polymicrobial infections in early infections; iii) the occurrence of PJI with negative cultures in approximately one fourth of the subjects.

Keywords

arthroplasty, replacement, knee - postoperative complications - intraarticular injections - prosthesis-related infections

* Study developed at Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. April 2022

Angenommen: 12. September 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Juni 2023

© 2023. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Delanois RE, Mistry JB, Gwam CU, Mohamed NS, Choksi US, Mont MA. Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (09) 2663-2668
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Evangelopoulos DS, Ahmad SS, Krismer AM. et al. Periprosthetic Infection: Major Cause of Early Failure of Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (10) 941-946
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Meyer JA, Zhu M, Cavadino A, Coleman B, Munro JT, Young SW. Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141 (08) 1373-1383
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4 McNally M, Sousa R, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M. et al. The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B (01) 18-25
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K. et al. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (05) 1309-1314 .e2
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Schwarz EM, Parvizi J, Gehrke T. et al. 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (05) 997-1006
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (16) 1645-1654
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Morawietz L, Tiddens O, Mueller M. et al. Twenty-three neutrophil granulocytes in 10 high-power fields is the best histopathological threshold to differentiate between aseptic and septic endoprosthesis loosening. Histopathology 2009; 54 (07) 847-853
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kalbian I, Park JW, Goswami K, Lee YK, Parvizi J, Koo KH. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: prevalence, aetiology, evaluation, recommendations, and treatment. Int Orthop 2020; 44 (07) 1255-1261
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Tan TL, Kheir MM, Shohat N. et al. Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Update on What to Expect. JBJS Open Access 2018; 3 (03) e0060
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Palan J, Nolan C, Sarantos K, Westerman R, King R, Foguet P. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4 (10) 585-594
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Tarabichi M, Shohat N, Goswami K. et al. Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Potential of Next-Generation Sequencing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (02) 147-154
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Drago L, Clerici P, Morelli I. et al. The World Association against Infection in Orthopaedics and Trauma (WAIOT) procedures for Microbiological Sampling and Processing for Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJIs) and other Implant-Related Infections. J Clin Med 2019; 8 (07) E933
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bémer P, Léger J, Tandé D. et al; Centre de Référence des Infections Ostéo-articulaires du Grand Ouest (CRIOGO) Study Team. How Many Samples and How Many Culture Media To Diagnose a Prosthetic Joint Infection: a Clinical and Microbiological Prospective Multicenter Study. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54 (02) 385-391
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014; 27 (02) 302-345
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Peel TN, Cheng AC, Buising KL, Choong PFM. Microbiological aetiology, epidemiology, and clinical profile of prosthetic joint infections: are current antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines effective?. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56 (05) 2386-2391
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Cobo J, Miguel LG, Euba G. et al. Early prosthetic joint infection: outcomes with debridement and implant retention followed by antibiotic therapy. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17 (11) 1632-1637
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Rieber H, Frontzek A, Heinrich S. et al. Microbiological diagnosis of polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection revealed superiority of investigated tissue samples compared to sonicate fluid generated from the implant surface. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 106: 302-307
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Tsai Y, Chang CH, Lin YC, Lee SH, Hsieh PH, Chang Y. Different microbiological profiles between hip and knee prosthetic joint infections. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2019; 27 (02) 2309499019847768
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Li C, Renz N, Trampuz A, Ojeda-Thies C. Twenty common errors in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. [published correction appears in Int Orthop 2019 Dec 10] Int Orthop 2020; 44 (01) 3-14
    Suche in Google Scholar