Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13(05): 1079-1091
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758482
Research Article

Understanding the Digital Disruption of Health Care: An Ethnographic Study of Real-Time Multidisciplinary Clinical Behavior in a New Digital Hospital

Oliver J. Canfell
1   Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
2   UQ Business School, Faculty of Business, Economics and Law, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
3   Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Australian Government, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
4   Queensland Digital Health Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Yasaman Meshkat
5   School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Zack Kodiyattu
5   School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Teyl Engstrom
1   Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
4   Queensland Digital Health Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Wilkin Chan
5   School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Jayden Mifsud
5   School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Jason D. Pole
1   Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
4   Queensland Digital Health Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Martin Byrne
6   Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Ella Van Raders
6   Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Herston, Queensland, Australia
,
Clair Sullivan
1   Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
4   Queensland Digital Health Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
6   Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Herston, Queensland, Australia
› Author Affiliations Funding O.J.C. was funded by the Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre (DHCRC-0083).
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Understanding electronic medical record (EMR) implementation in digital hospitals has focused on retrospective “work as imagined” experiences of multidisciplinary clinicians, rather than “work as done” behaviors. Our research question was “what is the behavior of multidisciplinary clinicians during the transition to a new digital hospital?”

Objectives The aim of the study is to: (1) Observe clinical behavior of multidisciplinary clinicians in a new digital hospital using ethnography. (2) Develop a thematic framework of clinical behavior in a new digital hospital.

Methods The setting was the go-live of a greenfield 182-bed digital specialist public hospital in Queensland, Australia. Participants were multidisciplinary clinicians (allied health, nursing, medical, and pharmacy). Clinical ethnographic observations were conducted between March and April 2021 (approximately 1 month post-EMR implementation). Observers shadowed clinicians in real-time performing a diverse range of routine clinical activities and recorded any clinical behavior related to interaction with the digital hospital. Data were analyzed in two phases: (1) content analysis using machine learning (Leximancer v4.5); (2) researcher-led interpretation of the text analytics to generate contextual meaning and finalize themes.

Results A total of 55 multidisciplinary clinicians (41.8% allied health, 23.6% nursing, 20% medical, 14.6% pharmacy) were observed across 58 hours and 99 individual patient encounters. Five themes were derived: (1) Workflows for clinical documentation; (2) Navigating a digital hospital; (3) Digital efficiencies; (4) Digital challenges; (5) Patient experience. There was no observed harm attributable to the digital transition. Clinicians primarily used blended digital and paper workflows to achieve clinical goals. The EMR was generally used seamlessly. New digital workflows affected clinical productivity and caused frustration. Digitization enabled multitasking, clinical opportunism, and benefits to patient safety; however, clinicians were hesitant to trust digital information.

Conclusion This study improves our real-time understanding of the digital disruption of health care and can guide clinicians, managers, and health services toward digital transformation strategies based upon “work as done.”

Keywords

electronic medical records - eHealth - hospitals - digital hospital - digital health - health care professional - electronic health record - patients

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was granted ethical approval by the human research ethics committee (HREC) at the target hospital and health service setting (HREC/2020/QRBW/69963) and ratified by an academic institutional HREC (2020/HE003004). Site research governance approval was granted by the relevant hospital and health service governance committee (SSA/2021/QRBW/69963).


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 23 May 2022

Accepted: 10 September 2022

Article published online:
09 November 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Dyda A, Fahim M, Fraser J. et al. Managing the digital disruption associated with COVID-19-driven rapid digital transformation in Brisbane, Australia. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (05) 1135-1143
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Budd J, Miller BS, Manning EM. et al. Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nat Med 2020; 26 (08) 1183-1192
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A. The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health 2020; 20 (01) 1193
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 World Health Organization. Global Strategy On Digital Health 2020–2025; 2020
  • 5 Adler-Milstein J, Holmgren AJ, Kralovec P, Worzala C, Searcy T, Patel V. Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital “advanced use” divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (06) 1142-1148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Sullivan C, Staib A. Digital disruption ‘syndromes’ in a hospital: important considerations for the quality and safety of patient care during rapid digital transformation. Aust Health Rev 2018; 42 (03) 294-298
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Robertson ST, Rosbergen ICM, Burton-Jones A, Grimley RS, Brauer SG. The effect of the electronic health record on interprofessional practice: a systematic review. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (03) 541-559
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Grant J, Collins R, Staib A, Sullivan C. Digitising an Australian university hospital: qualitative analysis of staff-reported impacts. Aust Health Rev 2020; 44 (05) 677-689
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Staib A, Sullivan C. Surveying perceptions of the early impacts of an integrated electronic medical record across a hospital and healthcare service. Aust Health Rev 2020; 44 (05) 690-698
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Jung SY, Hwang H, Lee K. et al. User perspectives on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of electronic health records in behavioral hospitals: qualitative study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5 (04) e18764-e18764
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Burkoski V, Yoon J, Hutchinson D, Solomon S, Collins BE. Experiences of nurses working in a fully digital hospital: a phenomenological study. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) 2019; 32 ( SP ): 72-85
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Tubaishat A. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of electronic health records among nurses: application of technology acceptance model. Inform Health Soc Care 2018; 43 (04) 379-389
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Schwarz M, Coccetti A, Draheim M, Gordon G. Perceptions of allied health staff of the implementation of an integrated electronic medical record across regional and metropolitan settings. Aust Health Rev 2020; 44 (06) 965-972
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Patel VL, Denton CA, Soni HC, Kannampallil TG, Traub SJ, Shapiro JS. Physician workflow in two distinctive emergency departments: an observational study. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (01) 141-152
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Catchpole K, Neyens DM, Abernathy J, Allison D, Joseph A, Reeves ST. Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26 (12) 1015-1021
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Garfield S, Jheeta S, Husson F. et al. The role of hospital inpatients in supporting medication safety: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2016; 11 (04) e0153721-e0153721
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Morrison C, Jones M, Blackwell A, Vuylsteke A. Electronic patient record use during ward rounds: a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff. Crit Care 2008; 12 (06) R148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Spinnewijn L, Aarts J, Verschuur S, Braat D, Gerrits T, Scheele F. Knowing what the patient wants: a hospital ethnography studying physician culture in shared decision making in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2020; 10 (03) e032921
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014; 89 (09) 1245-1251
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Vidal N, Kielmann K. A Guide to Clinic Ethnography: Core Protocol for Assessment of Patient Experience and Service Provision Culture. National Institute for Health Research Unit; 2019
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Oswald D, Sherratt F, Smith S. Handling the Hawthorne effect: the challenges surrounding a participant observer. Rev Soc Stud 2014; 1 (01) 53-73
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Haynes E, Green J, Garside R, Kelly MP, Guell C. Gender and active travel: a qualitative data synthesis informed by machine learning. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2019; 16 (01) 135-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Leximancer Pty Ltd. Leximancer User Guide: Release 4.5; Brisbane 2021:1–141. Available at: https://www.leximancer.com/s/Leximancer-User-Guide-45.pdf
  • 24 Haynes E, Garside R, Green J, Kelly MP, Thomas J, Guell C. Semiautomated text analytics for qualitative data synthesis. Res Synth Methods 2019; 10 (03) 452-464
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Burridge L, Foster M, Jones R, Geraghty T, Atresh S. Person-centred care in a digital hospital: observations and perspectives from a specialist rehabilitation setting. Aust Health Rev 2018; 42 (05) 529-535
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Enticott J, Johnson A, Teede H. Learning health systems using data to drive healthcare improvement and impact: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21 (01) 200
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12 (06) 573-576
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Scott I, Staib A, Sullivan C. Effects of eHealth on hospital practice: synthesis of the current literature. Aust Health Rev 2018; 42 (05) 568-578
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Nguyen K-H, Wright C, Simpson D, Woods L, Comans T, Sullivan C. Economic evaluation and analyses of hospital-based electronic medical records (EMRs): a scoping review of international literature. NPJ Digit Med 2022; 5 (01) 29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Vollbrecht H, Arora V, Otero S, Carey K, Meltzer D, Press VG. Evaluating the need to address digital literacy among hospitalized patients: cross-sectional observational study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (06) e17519
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Medlock S, Wyatt JC, Patel VL, Shortliffe EH, Abu-Hanna A. Modeling information flows in clinical decision support: key insights for enhancing system effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (05) 1001-1006
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kutney-Lee A, Brooks Carthon M, Sloane DM, Bowles KH, McHugh MD, Aiken LH. Electronic health record usability: associations with nurse and patient outcomes in hospitals. Med Care 2021; 59 (07) 625-631
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rozin P, Royzman EB. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2001; 5 (04) 296-320
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar