CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2022; 13(04): 224-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758533
Research Article

Indian Survey on Management of Choledocholithiasis—Opportunities for Improvement and Future Studies

1   Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Sudatta Waghmare
2   Department of General Surgery, Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Sridhar Sundaram
3   Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Rohan Khairatkar
4   Department of General Surgery, Dr Vaishampayan Memorial Medical College, Solapur, Maharashtra, India
,
Shreeyash Modak
5   Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
1   Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Manu Tandan
1   Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
G. Venkat Rao
5   Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
D. Nageshwar Reddy
1   Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background In clinical practice, decision about management of choledocholithiasis is driven by availability of resources and expertise, patients and healthcare professional preferences. This survey is aimed to describe the approach of physicians and surgeons for the management of choledocholithiasis.

Method A 36-question online survey was conducted using Google Forms on various aspects of management of choledocholithiasis.

Results The responses from 323 participants were included, of which 202 (62.54%) were physicians and 121 (37.46%) were surgeons. The proportion of responders who do not follow American or European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines is associated with increasing age and experience of responders (p = 0.0001), while place of work (private vs. teaching) and broad specialty (physician vs surgeon) are not associated (p >0.05). For patients with high likelihood of choledocholithiasis, 123 (38.1%) participants prefer to do endoscopic ultrasound/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (EUS/MRCP) rather than directly performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/intraoperative cholangiography (ERCP/IOC). For intermediate likelihood, MRCP is more commonly preferred compared with EUS, due to local availability (44%), expertise (39.6%), healthcare professionals preference (30.7%), and patients preference (17.3%). For difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones, short biliary sphincterotomy with large balloon sphincteroplasty (59.4%), followed by laparoscopic CBD exploration are commonly used approaches. Prophylactic CBD stent placement after ERCP and CBD clearance is common practice. Preoperative ERCP followed by cholecystectomy is more preferred approach than cholecystectomy and CBD exploration.

Conclusion There is considerable variability in the management of choledocholithiasis. The practices such as use of EUS/MRCP for high likelihood group, use of prophylactic CBD stent placement after ERCP and CBD clearance, and use of single stage approach especially in patient with intermediate likelihood group should be addressed in future studies.

Authors' Contributions

Nitin Jagtap, Sudatta Waghmare, and Rohan Khairatkar conceptualized and designed the study. Nitin Jagtap, Sridhar Sundaram, and Shreeyash Modak provided materials. Nitin Jagtap, Sridhar Sundaram, and Shreeyash Modak helped in data collection and/or processing. Jagtap Nitin and Sridhar Sundaram contributed to analysis and/or interpretation. Rohan Khairatkar and Nitin Jagtap were involved in literature search. Nitin Jagtap, Manu Tandan, and Sudatta Waghmare wrote manuscript. Sundeep Lakhtakia, G Venkat Rao, and D Nageshwar Reddy critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors provided final approval.




Publication History

Article published online:
15 December 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K. Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (06) 734-738
  • 2 Jagtap N, Hs Y, Tandan M. et al. Clinical utility of ESGE and ASGE guidelines for prediction of suspected choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 2020; 52 (07) 569-573
  • 3 Vannijvel M, Lesurtel M, Bouckaert W. et al. A survey of European-African surgeons' management of common bile duct stones. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18 (12) 959-964
  • 4 Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S. et al; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89 (06) 1075-1105 .e15
  • 5 Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L. et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51 (05) 472-491
  • 6 Konsue C, Eurboonyanun C, Ruangwannasak S. et al. Factors associated with the success rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with standard technique followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of choledocholithiasis: a single-center experience. J Digest Endosc 2020; 11: 126-133
  • 7 Zhu HY, Xu M, Shen HJ. et al. A meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2015; 39 (05) 584-593
  • 8 Singh AN, Kilambi R. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (09) 3763-3776
  • 9 Tanase A, Dhanda A, Cramp M, Streeter A, Aroori S. A UK survey on variation in the practice of management of choledocholithiasis and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (ALiCE Survey). Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (08) 5882-5896
  • 10 Choi YH, Lee YS, Lee SH. et al. Role of EUS at high risk for choledocholithiasis without severe cholangitis and visible stone on cross-sectional imaging: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10 (06) 455-462
  • 11 Jagtap N, Kumar JK, Chavan R. et al. EUS versus MRCP to perform ERCP in patients with intermediate likelihood of choledocholithiasis: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2022 gutjnl-2021-325080
  • 12 Ali FS, DaVee T, Bernstam EV. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of optimal diagnostic strategy for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with intermediate probability for choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95 (02) 327-338
  • 13 Jagtap N, Karyampudi A, Yashavanth HS. et al. Intermediate likelihood of choledocholithiasis: do all need EUS or MRCP?. J Digest Endosc 2021; 12: 19-23
  • 14 Baucom RB, Feurer ID, Shelton JS, Kummerow K, Holzman MD, Poulose BK. Surgeons, ERCP, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: do we need a standard approach for common bile duct stones?. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (02) 414-423
  • 15 Wandling MW, Hungness ES, Pavey ES. et al. Nationwide assessment of trends in choledocholithiasis management in the United States from 1998 to 2013. JAMA Surg 2016; 151 (12) 1125-1130