Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758717
Intraoperative Wound Lavage System for Deep Neck Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research.Abstract
Introduction Multiple solutions are currently used to cleanse a deep neck infection (DNI), and a variety of devices are available to deliver wound irrigation solutions. An essential difference between these devices is the pressure that the irrigation solution exerts over the wound tissue.
Objective To compare low-pressure and high-pressure irrigation delivery systems for wound cleansing in DNI.
Methods we designed a retrospective cohort study and reviewed the medical records of patients operated on due to DNI from June 2016 to December 2017 at our institution. One cohort included patients treated with an intraoperative irrigation method that exerts low pressure over the irrigated tissue, and the other cohort, to a system capable of generating higher pressure. The Pearson Chi-squared test was used to analyze the data.
Results A total of 42 patients whose ages ranged from 16 months to 72 years were included. The low-pressure irrigation system was used in 18 patients, and the high-pressure system was used in 24 patients. No statistical differences were observed regarding the irrigation methods, the complexity of the DNI, and the overall outcomes.
Conclusions The present is the first study in which low- and high-pressure systems for wound lavage were evaluated in the treatment of DNI. When comparing these methods, we did not find one to be superior to the other; however, the additional cost associated with the high-pressure devices may not justify their in head and neck procedures.
Publication History
Received: 09 August 2022
Accepted: 12 September 2022
Article published online:
06 October 2023
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Adoviča A, Veidere L, Ronis M, Sumeraga G. Deep neck infections: review of 263 cases. Otolaryngol Pol 2017; 71 (05) 37-42
- 2 Wills PI, Vernon Jr RP. Complications of space infections of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 1981; 91 (07) 1129-1136
- 3 Sumi Y. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: 5 years of published data in Japan. Acute Med Surg 2014; 2 (01) 1-12
- 4 Tapiovaara L, Bäck L, Aro K. Comparison of intubation and tracheotomy in patients with deep neck infection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (10) 3767-3772
- 5 Barnes S, Spencer M, Graham D, Johnson HB. Surgical wound irrigation: a call for evidence-based standardization of practice. Am J Infect Control 2014; 42 (05) 525-529
- 6 Luedtke-Hoffmann KA, Schafer DS. Pulsed lavage in wound cleansing. Phys Ther 2000; 80 (03) 292-300
- 7 Wein D. NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine [Internet]. ClinicalTrials.gov: NIH NLM Identifier: NCT01076049. 2010 [updated 2021 Aug 23; cited 2021 Sep 1]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01076049?titles=The+Effect+of+Irrisept+for+Irrigation+of+Skin+and+Soft+Tissue+Infections+%28Irrisept+USF+Study%29&draw=2&rank=1
- 8 Dray S, Forel JM, Papazian L. What's new in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections using chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated washcloths. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45 (02) 249-251
- 9 Edmiston Jr CE, Bruden B, Rucinski MC, Henen C, Graham MB, Lewis BL. Reducing the risk of surgical site infections: does chlorhexidine gluconate provide a risk reduction benefit?. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41 (5, Suppl) S49-S55
- 10 Siddiqi A, Abdo ZE, Springer BD, Chen AF. Pursuit of the ideal antiseptic irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic joint infections. J Bone Jt Infect 2021; 6 (06) 189-198
- 11 Ding MC, Lee CY, Wang YT, Hsu CM, Tsai YT, Tsai MS. Innovative continuous-irrigation approach for wound care after deep neck infection surgery: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2021; 80: 105620
- 12 Kauffmann P, Cordesmeyer R, Tröltzsch M, Sömmer C, Laskawi R. Deep neck infections: A single-center analysis of 63 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2017; 22 (05) e536-e541
- 13 Vieira F, Allen SM, Stocks RM, Thompson JW. Deep neck infection. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2008; 41 (03) 459-483 , vii
- 14 Boyd III JI, Wongworawat MD. High-pressure pulsatile lavage causes soft tissue damage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 427 (427) 13-17
- 15 Fry DE. Pressure irrigation of surgical incisions and traumatic wounds. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017; 18 (04) 424-430
- 16 Dirschl DR, Duff GP, Dahners LE, Edin M, Rahn BA, Miclau T. High pressure pulsatile lavage irrigation of intraarticular fractures: effects on fracture healing. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12 (07) 460-463
- 17 Pronchik D, Barber C, Rittenhouse S. Low- versus high-pressure irrigation techniques in Staphylococcus aureus-inoculated wounds. Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17 (02) 121-124