CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2023; 12(03): 223-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758778
Original Article

Therapeutic Neurointervention through Transradial Approach: Preliminary Experience from a Tertiary Care Center

Vikas Bhatia
1   Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Section of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuroradiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
1   Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Section of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuroradiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Mohd Yaqoob Wani
1   Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Section of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuroradiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Navneet Singla
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Anuj Prabhakar
1   Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Section of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuroradiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Madhivanan Karthigeyan
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Rajeev Chauhan
3   Department of Anaesthesia, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of radial access for therapeutic neurointervention procedures.

Methods The retrospective evaluation of 20 patients taken for therapeutic neurointervention through transradial access at our institute was done from July 2021 to April 2022.

Results Therapeutic neurointervention procedures were attempted in 20 patients (age, 24–74 years; mean age, 48.4 years; 13 (65%) females using a transradial approach. The radial artery's mean diameter was 2.135 mm. The right radial access was taken in 18 (90%) cases. Indications for treatment were ruptured aneurysm in 13 (65%), mechanical thrombectomy in 5 (25%), flow diversion for a recanalized aneurysm in 1 (5%), and balloon occlusion test in 1 (5%) case. The procedure was successful through the transradial approach in 18 (90%) procedures. Failure was seen in two cases that were completed after conversion to the transfemoral approach. The reason for access conversion was a severe spasm in both cases. No significant access site complications were seen in the study cohort.

Conclusion A radial access route is a promising approach for therapeutic interventions with a high success rate and minimal access site complications. Interventionists should get accustomed to this approach as primary or alternative access for neurointervention.



Publication History

Article published online:
23 December 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML. et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44 (02) 349-356
  • 2 Apala DR, Jhand A, Chandra A. et al. A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of transradial versus transfemoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73: 1283
  • 3 Jin C, Li W, Qiao SB. et al. Costs and benefits associated with transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in China. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5 (04) e002684
  • 4 Almallouhi E, Leary J, Wessell J. et al. Fast-track incorporation of the transradial approach in endovascular neurointervention. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12 (02) 176-180
  • 5 Joshi KC, Beer-Furlan A, Crowley RW, Chen M, Munich SA. Transradial approach for neurointerventions: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12 (09) 886-892
  • 6 Goland J, Doroszuk GF, Garbugino SL, Ypa MP. Transradial approach to treating endovascular cerebral aneurysms: case series and technical note. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8: 73
  • 7 Chivot C, Bouzerar R, Yzet T. Transitioning to transradial access for cerebral aneurysm embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40 (11) 1947-1953
  • 8 Goland J, Doroszuk G. Transradial approach for endovascular diagnosis and treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a descriptive study. Surg Neurol Int 2019; 10: 87
  • 9 Sattur MG, Almallouhi E, Lena JR, Spiotta AM. Illustrated guide to the transradial approach for neuroendovascular surgery: a step-by-step description gleaned from over 500 cases at an early adopter single center. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2020; 19 (02) 181-189
  • 10 Goldman DT, Bageac D, Mills A. et al. Transradial approach for neuroendovascular procedures: a single-center review of safety and feasibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42 (02) 313-318
  • 11 Son C, Tavakoli S, Mahadev V. Systematic review of transradial access for flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2021; 151: 6-11
  • 12 Peterson C, Waldau B. Transradial access for thrombectomy in acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 198: 106235-2020
  • 13 Weinberg JH, Sweid A, Hassan A. et al. Early experience with a novel 088 long sheath in transradial neurointerventions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 202: 106510
  • 14 Barros G, Bass DI, Osbun JW. et al. Left transradial access for cerebral angiography. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12 (04) 427-430
  • 15 Yaser Arafath M, Bhatia V, Kumar A. et al. Adapting to transradial approach in cerebral angiography: factors influencing successful cannulation. Neuroradiol J 2023; 36 (02) 163-168