Difference between Capillary Blood Glucose of Free Flap and the Patient: A Novel Objective Marker of Free Flap Vascular Compromise during Postoperative Monitoring

Abstract

Background Defining cut-off values of flap glucose levels in diagnosing free flap vascular compromise, without taking patients' glucose levels into account, does not hold good in all circumstances, especially in cases of high fluctuations in patients' capillary blood glucose and in diabetic patients. The aim of our study was to establish the role of capillary blood glucose measurements of the flap in relation to patients' fingertip, as an objective tool for postoperative free flap monitoring.

Methods A total of 76 free flaps underwent postoperative monitoring with reference test (clinical parameters) and simultaneously with our index test (difference between capillary blood glucose of free flap and the patient), in non-diabetic and diabetic patients. Patients' demography and flap characteristics were also recorded. An ROC curve was plotted to determine diagnostic accuracy and cut-offs of the index test in diagnosing free flap vascular compromise.

Results Our Index test has a cut-off value of 24.5 mg/dL with 68.75% sensitivity and 93% specificity, with an accuracy of 91.54%.

Conclusion The difference between capillary blood glucose of free flap and the patient is simple, feasible, and inexpensive, and can be done by any health care professional and does not require any specialized facilities or training. It has an excellent diagnostic accuracy to detect impending free flap vascular compromise, especially in non-diabetics. Although in diabetics, this test becomes less accurate. Being an observer-independent objective test, the difference in capillary blood glucose of patient and flap measurement can be used as a highly reliable tool for postoperative free flap monitoring.

Keywords

free flap - flap monitoring - capillary glucose measurement - objective monitoring

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Dezember 2022

• References

• 1 Sakakibara S, Hashikawa K, Omori M, Terashi H, Tahara S. A simplest method of flap monitoring. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (07) 433-434
• 2 Bashir MM, Tayyab Z, Afzal S, Khan FA. Diagnostic accuracy of blood glucose measurements in detecting venous compromise in flaps. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (05) 1492-1494
• 3 Hara H, Mihara M, Iida T. et al. Blood glucose measurement for flap monitoring to salvage flaps from venous thrombosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (05) 616-619
• 4 Sharma MK, Ete G, Chaturvedi G, Barreto E, Doss K. Prospective analysis of flap perfusion by measuring capillary glucose level in flaps. Eur J Plast Surg 2018; 42: 119-124
• 5 Karakawa R, Yoshimatsu H, Narushima M, Iida T. Ratio of blood glucose level change measurement for flap monitoring. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (07) e1851
• 6 Setälä LP, Korvenoja EM, Härmä MA, Alhava EM, Uusaro AV, Tenhunen JJ. Glucose, lactate, and pyruvate response in an experimental model of microvascular flap ischemia and reperfusion: a microdialysis study. Microsurgery 2004; 24 (03) 223-231
• 7 Neligan PC. Monitoring techniques for the detection of flow failure in the postoperative period. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (03) 162-164
• 8 Vedder NB. Flap Physiology. In: Mathes SJ. ed. Plastic Surgery. Vol. 1, 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006: 496-497
• 9 MedCalc statistical software. Accessed January 15, 2022 at: https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php
• 10 Kishi K, Ishida K, Makino Y, Miyawaki T. A Simple Way to Measure Glucose and Lactate Values During Free Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77 (01) 226.e1-226.e9