CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2023; 56(01): 013-021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760093
Meta-Analysis

Outcome Analysis Comparing Muscle and Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps for Heel Reconstruction: Meta-Analysis and Case Series

1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Ramesh B. A.
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Choosing the components of free flap (fasciocutaneous or muscle) is one of the crucial but controversial decisions in heel reconstruction. This meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date comparison of fasciocutaneous flaps (FCFs) and muscle flaps (MFs) for heel reconstruction and to ascertain if one flap has an advantage over the other.

Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic literature review was performed identifying studies on heel reconstruction with FCF and MF. Primary outcomes were survival, time of ambulation, sensation, ulceration, gait, need for specialized footwear, revision procedures, and shear. Meta-analyses and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) were performed to estimate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with fixed effects and random effects models, respectively.

Results Of 757 publications identified, 20 were reviewed including 255 patients with 263 free flaps. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between MF and FCF in terms of survival (RR, 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83, 1.21), gait abnormality (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.19, 1.59), ulcerations (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.27, 1.54), footwear modification (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26, 1.09), and revision procedures (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.84, 3.32). FCF had superior perception of deep pressure (RR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.32, 3.00), light touch, and pain (RR, 5.17; 95% CI, 2.02, 13.22) compared with MF. Time to full weight-bearing (SMD, –3.03; 95% CI, –4.25, –1.80) was longer for MF compared with FCF. TSA showed inconclusive results for comparison of the survival of flaps, gait assessment, and rates of ulceration.

Conclusion Patients reconstructed with FCF had superior sensory recovery and early weight bearing on their reconstructed heels, hence faster return to daily activities compared with MFs. In terms of other outcomes such as footwear modification and revision procedure, both flaps had no statistically significant difference. The results were inconclusive regarding the survival of flaps, gait assessment, and rates of ulceration. Future studies are required to investigate the role of shear on the stability of the reconstructed heels.

Authors' Contributions

A.C.: Conception and design, acquisition of data, drafting the article, and final approval of the version. S.K.J.: Conception and design, acquisition of data, drafting the article, and final approval of the version. R.B.A.: Conception and design, acquisition of data, drafting the article, and final approval of the version.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
08 January 2023

© 2023. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 El-Shazly M, Yassin O, Kamal A, Makboul M, Gherardini G. Soft tissue defects of the heel: a surgical reconstruction algorithm based on a retrospective cohort study. J Foot Ankle Surg 2008; 47 (02) 145-152
  • 2 Thoolen M, Ryan TJ, Bristow I. A study of the skin of the sole of the foot using high-frequency ultrasonography and histology. Foot 2000; 10 (01) 14-17
  • 3 Sönmez A, Bayramiçli M, Sönmez B, Numanoğlu A. Reconstruction of the weight-bearing surface of the foot with nonneurosensory free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (07) 2230-2236
  • 4 Selmanpakoglu N, Güler M, Sengezer M, Türegün M, Isik S, Demirogullari M. Reconstruction of foot defects due to mine explosion using muscle flaps. Microsurgery 1998; 18 (03) 182-188
  • 5 Sinha AK, Wood MB, Irons GB. Free tissue transfer for reconstruction of the weight-bearing portion of the foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (242) 269-271
  • 6 Fox CM, Beem HM, Wiper J, Rozen WM, Wagels M, Leong JC. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in heel reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (01) 59-66
  • 7 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000100
  • 8 McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (03) 276-282
  • 9 Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses | The BMJ. Accessed May 5, 2021 at: https://www.bmj.com/content/327/7414/557
  • 10 9.5.2 Identifying and measuring heterogeneity. Accessed June 7, 2021 at: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_9/9_5_2_identifying_and_measuring_heterogeneity.htm
  • 11 Claire R, Gluud C, Berlin I, Coleman T, Leonardi-Bee J. Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20 (01) 284
  • 12 Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Accessed May 5, 2022 from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
  • 13 RevMan for non-Cochrane reviews. Available at: https://training.cochrane.org//online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman/revman-non-cochrane-reviews. Accessed April 28, 2021
  • 14 TSA – ctu.dk. Accessed March 29, 2022 at: https://ctu.dk/tsa/
  • 15 Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (09) 712-716
  • 16 Heymans O, Verhelle N, Lahaye T. Covering small defects on the weight bearing surfaces of the foot: the free temporal fasciocutaneous flap. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58 (04) 460-465
  • 17 Noever G, Brüser P, Köhler L. Reconstruction of heel and sole defects by free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (03) 345-352
  • 18 Rautio J, Asko-Seljavaara S, Laasonen L, Härmä M. Suitability of the scapular flap for reconstructions of the foot. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (06) 922-928
  • 19 Santanelli F, Tenna S, Pace A, Scuderi N. Free flap reconstruction of the sole of the foot with or without sensory nerve coaptation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2314-2322 , discussion 2323–2324
  • 20 Weinzweig N, Davies BW. Foot and ankle reconstruction using the radial forearm flap: a review of 25 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (06) 1999-2005
  • 21 Duncan MJ, Zuker RM, Manktelow RT. Resurfacing weight bearing areas of the heel. The role of the dorsalis pedis innervated free tissue transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 1985; 1 (03) 201-208
  • 22 Elgohary H, Nawar AM, Zidan A, Shoulah AA, Younes MT. Functional and aesthetic outcomes of reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the heel with free flap. JPRAS Open 2018; 19: 35-44
  • 23 Han Y, Han Y, Song B, Guo L, Tao R, Chai M. Free medial plantar flap versus free dorsal myocutaneous flap for the reconstruction of traumatic foot sole defects. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (5S, Suppl 3): S178-S185
  • 24 Qing L, Wu P, Yu F, Zhou Z, Tang J. Use of dual-skin paddle anterolateral thigh perforator flaps in the reconstruction of complex defect of the foot and ankle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (09) 1231-1238
  • 25 Wood MB, Irons GB, Cooney III WP. Foot reconstruction by free flap transfer. Foot Ankle 1983; 4 (01) 2-7
  • 26 Varghese BK, Babu P, Roy T. Microsurgical free muscle flaps for reconstruction of post-traumatic complex tissue defects of foot. Med J Armed Forces India 2016; 72 (02) 131-139
  • 27 Harris PG, Letrosne E, Caouette-Laberge L, Egerszegi EP. Long-term follow-up of coverage of weight bearing surface of the foot with free muscular flap in a pediatric population. Microsurgery 1994; 15 (06) 424-429
  • 28 Oztürk S, Bayram Y, Möhür H, Deveci M, Sengezer M. Evaluation of late functional results of patients treated with free muscle flaps for heel defects caused by land-mine explosions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (07) 1926-1936
  • 29 Kuran I, Turgut G, Bas L, Ozkan T, Bayri O, Gulgonen A. Comparison between sensitive and nonsensitive free flaps in reconstruction of the heel and plantar area. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (02) 574-580
  • 30 Langstein HN, Chang DW, Miller MJ. et al. Limb salvage for soft-tissue malignancies of the foot: an evaluation of free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (01) 152-159
  • 31 Potparić Z, Rajacić N. Long-term results of weight-bearing foot reconstruction with non-innervated and reinnervated free flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50 (03) 176-181
  • 32 Roggero P, Blanc Y, Krupp S. Foot reconstruction in weight bearing area. Eur J Plast Surg 1993; 16 (04) 186-192
  • 33 Yücel A, Senyuva C, Aydin Y, Cinar C, Güzel Z. Soft-tissue reconstruction of sole and heel defects with free tissue transfers. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 44 (03) 259-268 , discussion 268–269
  • 34 Grauberger JN, Gibreel WO, Moran SL, Carlsen BT, Bakri K. Long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes in free flap reconstruction of the weight-bearing heel pad and non-weight-bearing Achilles tendon regions. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (08) 835-845
  • 35 Sommerlad BC, McGrouther DA. Resurfacing the sole: long-term follow-up and comparison of techniques. Br J Plast Surg 1978; 31 (02) 107-116
  • 36 Gidumal R, Carl A, Evanski P, Shaw W, Waugh TR. Functional evaluation of nonsensate free flaps to the sole of the foot. Foot Ankle 1986; 7 (02) 118-123
  • 37 Perttunen J, Rautio J, Komi PV. Gait patterns after free flap reconstruction of the foot sole. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29 (03) 271-278
  • 38 May Jr JW, Rohrich RJ. Foot reconstruction using free microvascular muscle flaps with skin grafts. Clin Plast Surg 1986; 13 (04) 681-689
  • 39 Chang KN, DeArmond SJ, Buncke Jr HJ. Sensory reinnervation in microsurgical reconstruction of the heel. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (05) 652-664
  • 40 Milanov NO, Adamyan RT. Functional results of microsurgical reconstruction of plantar defects. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (01) 52-56
  • 41 Rautio J, Kekoni J, Hämäläinen H, Härmä M, Asko-Seljavaara S. Mechanical sensibility in free and island flaps of the foot. J Reconstr Microsurg 1989; 5 (02) 119-125
  • 42 Goldberg JA, Trabulsy P, Lineaweaver WC, Buncke HJ. Sensory reinnervation of muscle free flaps for foot reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 1994; 10 (01) 7-9
  • 43 Lord M, Reynolds DP, Hughes JR. Foot pressure measurement: a review of clinical findings. J Biomed Eng 1986; 8 (04) 283-294