Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71(05): 407-412
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760204
Original Cardiovascular

Single-Center Experience of Pulmonary Endarterectomy for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: The Results from the Tabriz University Medical Sciences (TUMS) CTEPH Program

Rezayat Parvizi
1   Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
,
Eisa Bilehjani
1   Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
,
Babak Mahmoudian
2   Medical Radiation Sciences Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
,
3   Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
,
Hooriah Shojaan
3   Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
,
Khalil Ansarin
3   Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
,
Farid Rashidi
3   Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
› Institutsangaben

Funding The authoring team received no funding for this report.
Preview

Abstract

Introduction Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) remains the preferred and potentially curative option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This study aimed to report the results of PEA for CTEPH in a tertiary center in Tabriz, Iran.

Methods We analyzed the results of 42 CTEPH patients undergoing PEA, who were enrolled in the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (TUMS-CTEPH) from January 2016 to October 2020. The main outcome measures included the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, the 6-Minute Walk Distance, hemodynamic measures in right heart catheterization, morbidity, and mortality.

Results There was a significant improvement in the NYHA function class (2.6 ± 0.5 vs 1.1 ± 0.34), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (47.1 ± 13 vs 27.9 ± 8 mm Hg), cardiac output (4.3 ± 1.06 vs 5.9 ± 1.2 L/min), and pulmonary vascular resistance (709.4 ± 297.5 vs 214 ± 77 dyn s/cm5). Fifteen patients (35%) developed complications. The most common complication (10 [23%]) was reperfusion injury. Also, postsurgical mortality was 4% during hospital admission and 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion This is the first single-center report of PEA from Iran. Post-PEA and 1-year survival were acceptable as a referral center. PEA can be performed safe with low mortality. Greater awareness of PEA and patients' access to experienced CTEPH centers are important issues.

Disclosure

The material is available as a preprint on Research Square.


Authors' Contribution

F.R. had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: F.R., R.P., E.B., A.K., B.M., and K.A. The first draft of the manuscript was written by F.R. and R.P., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. August 2022

Angenommen: 22. November 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Januar 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany