RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-102947
Suprachoroidale Hydrogelplombe – eine neue minimalinvasive Technik zur Behandlung der rhegmatogenen Netzhautablösung
Suprachoroidal Hydrogel Buckle – a New Minimal-Invasive Technique in Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal DetachmentPublikationsverlauf
eingereicht 15. Dezember 2016
akzeptiert 24. Januar 2017
Publikationsdatum:
04. April 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/klimo/201903/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0043-102947_kl1705-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Die suprachoroidale Hydrogelplombe ist ein neues, einfaches und sicheres Verfahren zur Behandlung der Netzhautablösung. Die technischen Vorteile der modernen Vitrektomie und der klassischen Buckelchirurgie sollen in diesem operativen Ansatz vereint werden. Die Technik kann additiv in Kombination mit der Vitrektomie oder als „stand-alone procedure“ angewendet werden. Als geeignetes Tamponadematerial hat sich das quervernetzte Hydrogel mit einer Resorptionsdauer von bis zu 8 Wochen herausgestellt. Es werden noch weitere Untersuchungen mit Langzeiterfahrungen empfohlen, die zu einer weiteren Verbreitung der suprachoroidalen Hydrogelplombe als operatives Verfahren zur Behandlung der Netzhautablösung führen sollten.
Abstract
The suprachoroidal hydrogel buckle is a new, simple and safe procedure for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. This technique combines the advantages of modern vitrectomy and classic buckling surgery. Placing the suprachoroidal buckle is possible as a stand-alone procedure or in addition to vitrectomy. The cross-linked hyaluronic acid seems to be the ideal agent for the suprachoroidal buckle with a buckling effect over 8 weeks. We need further investigations with long-term results.
-
Literatur
- 1 Gonin J. Le traitement de décollement rétinien. Ann Ocul 1921; 158: 175-194
- 2 Custodis E. Bedeutet die Plombenaufnähung auf die Sklera einen Fortschritt in der operativen Behandlung der Netzhautablösung?. Ber Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 1953; 58: 102-105
- 3 Abdullah AS, Jan S, Qureshi MS. et al. Complications of conventional scleral buckling occurring during and after treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20: 321-326
- 4 Ah-Fat FG, Sharma MC, Majid MA. et al. Trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre: 1987 to 1996. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 396-398
- 5 Wong D, Billington BM, Chignell AH. Pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment with unseen retinal holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1987; 225: 269-271
- 6 Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S. et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): Recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 803-809
- 7 Mittl RN, Tiwari R. Suprachoroidal injection of sodium hyaluronate as an ‘internal’ buckling procedure. Ophthalmic Res 1987; 19: 255-260
- 8 Poole T, Sudarsky R. Suprachoroidal implantation for the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 1408-1412
- 9 El Rayes EN. Suprachoroidal buckling. Dev Ophthalmol 2014; 54: 135-146
- 10 El Rayes EN, Mikhail M, El Cheweiky H. et al. Suprachoroidal buckling for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments secondary to peripheral retinal breaks. Retina 2016; DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001214.
- 11 Oshima Y, El Rayes EN, Matsumura N. et al. Suprachoroidal buckling technique. Retina Today 2013; 33: 71-76
- 12 Szurman P, Januschowski K, Boden KT. et al. A modified scleral dissection technique with suprachoroidal drainage for canaloplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254: 351-354
- 13 Seuthe AM, Ivanescu C, Leers S. et al. Modified canaloplasty with suprachoroidal drainage versus conventional canaloplasty – 1-year results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254: 1591-1597
- 14 Binder S, Stanzel BV, Krebs I. et al. Transplantation of the RPE in AMD. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007; 26: 516-554
- 15 Bindewald A, Roth F, Van Meurs J. et al. Transplantation of retinal pigment pithelium (RPE) following CNV removal in patients with AMD. Techniques, results, outlook. Ophthalmologe 2004; 101: 886-894
- 16 Heussen FM, Fawzy NF, Joeres S. et al. Autologous translocation of the choroid and RPE in age-related macular degeneration: 1-year follow-up in 30 patients and recommendations for patient selection. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22: 799-807
- 17 Treumer F, Klatt C, Roider J. Autologous RPE-choroid translocation in exudative AMD. A case series of 10 consecutive patients. Ophthalmologe 2007; 104: 795-802
- 18 Mazinani B, Baumgarten S, Schiller P. et al. Vitrectomy with or without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: a multi-centre, three-arm, randomised clinical trial. VIPER Study Report No. 1 – design and enrolment. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 405-410
- 19 Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N. et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001; 239: 567-574
- 20 Hütz WW, Eckhardt HB, Kohnen T. Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996; 22: 955-959
- 21 Hsu WC, Ritch R, Krupin T. et al. Tissue bioengineering for surgical bleb defects: an animal study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246: 709-717
- 22 Zelefsky JR, Hsu W, Ritch R. Biodegradable collagen matrix implant for trabeculectomy. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2008; 3: 613-617
- 23 Chen HSL, Ritch R, Krupin T. et al. Control of filtering bleb structure through tissue bioengineering: An animal model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 5310-5314
- 24 Rosentreter A, Schild AM, Jordan JF. et al. A prospective randomised trial of trabeculectomy using mitomycin C vs. an ologen implant in open angle glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2010; 24: 1449-1457
- 25 Papaconstantinou D, Georgalas I, Karmiris E. et al. Trabeculectomy with OloGen versus trabeculectomy for the treatment of glaucoma: a pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol 2010; 88: 80-85
- 26 Szurman P, Boden K, Januschowski K. Suprachoroidal hydrogel buckling as a surgical treatment of retinal detachment: biocompatibility and first experiences. Retina 2016; 36: 1786-1790