Normaldruckhydrozephalus

Zusammenfassung

Für Diagnostik, Differenzialdiagnostik und Differenzialtherapie des Normaldruckhydrozephalus ist die Bildgebung entscheidend. Auch wenn die Therapie eines Normaldruckhydrozephalus nicht erfolgreich sein sollte, werden zahlreiche Fragen an den Radiologen gestellt. Der Artikel gibt eine Übersicht über das Krankheitsbild des Normaldruckhydrozephalus und die speziellen prä- und postchirurgischen Anforderungen an die Bildgebung.

Abstract

Normal pressure hydrocephalus is a very common disease in elderly people. It is a progressive disease. Patients untreated end bedridden, mortality is significantly higher. Normal pressure hydrocephalus is characterized by gait disturbance, incontinence and cognitive impairment. Typically ventriculomegaly and discrepancy of large basal and tight high convexity subarachnoid spaces are shown on MRI or CCT. Imaging helps also in differential indication for surgical treatment: Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Surgery is most effective with low complication rates. Postoperative imaging is needed if clinical improvement is missing and helps to detect causes of shunt malfunction.

Schlüsselwörter

Normaldruckhydrozephalus - DESH - InfinoH - ventrikuloperitonealer Shunt - MRT - Gravitationsventil

Key words

normal pressure hydrocephalus - DESH - InfinoH - ventriculo-peritoneal shunt - MRI - hydrostatic valves

• Literatur

• 1 Hakim S, Adams RD. The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 1965; 2: 307-327
• 2 Dauch WA, Zimmermann R. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. An evaluation 25 years following the initial description. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1990; 58: 178-190
• 3 Andrén K, Wikkelsø C, Tisell M. et al. Natural course of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85: 806-810
• 4 Hiraoka K, Meguro K, Mori E. Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in the elderly population of a Japanese rural community. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2008; 48: 197-199
• 5 Jaraj D, Rabiei K, Marlow T. et al. Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (the prevalence of probable iNPH was 0,2 % in those aged 70–79 years [n = 2] and 5,9 % [n = 24] in those aged 80 years). Neurology 2014; 82: 1449-1454
• 6 Fritsch M, Kehler U, Meier U. eds. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2014
• 7 Greitz D. Paradigm shift in hydrocephalus research in legacy of Dandyʼs pioneering work: rationale for third ventriculostomy in communicating hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23: 1229-1231
• 8 Silverberg GD, Mayo M, Saul T. et al. Alzheimerʼs disease, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, and senescent changes in CSF circulatory physiology: a hypothesis. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2: 506-511
• 9 Holodny AI, Waxman R, George AE. et al. MR differential diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease: significance of perihippocampal fissures. Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 813-819
• 10 Wikkelsö C, Andersson H, Blomstrand C. et al. Computed tomography of the brain in the diagnosis of and prognosis in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 1989; 31: 160-165
• 11 Evans WA. An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular enlargement and cerebral atrophy. Arch Neurol Psychiat 1942; 47: 931-937
• 12 Missori P, Rughetti A, Peschillo S. et al. In normal aging ventricular system never attains pathological values of Evansʼ index. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 11860-11863
• 13 Toma AK, Holl E, Kitchen ND. et al. Evansʼ index revisited: the need for an alternative in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2011; 68: 939-944
• 14 Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K. et al. CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 1277-1284
• 15 Craven CL, Toma AK, Mostafa T. et al. The predictive value of DESH for shunt responsiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 34: 294-298
• 16 Sjaastad O, Nordvik A. The corpus callosal angle in the diagnosis of cerebral ventricular enlargement. Acta Neurol Scand 1973; 49: 396-406
• 17 Ishii K, Kanda T, Harada A. et al. Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2678-2683
• 18 Virhammar J, Laurell K, Cesarini KG. et al. The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2014; 120: 178-184
• 19 Bradley jr. WG, Whittemore AR, Watanabe AS. et al. Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Neuroradiol 1991; 12: 31-39
• 20 Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W. et al. White matter lesions in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and in an age-matched control group: a comparative study. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 491-495
• 21 Inatomi Y, Yonehara T, Hashimoto Y. et al. Correlation between ventricular enlargement and white matter changes. J Neurol Sci 2008; 269: 12-17
• 22 Tullberg M, Jensen C, Ekholm S. et al. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1665-1673
• 23 Krauss JK, Droste DW, Vach W. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: effect of periventricular and deep white matter lesions. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 292-299
• 24 Kehler U, Gliemroth J. Extraventricular intracisternal obstructive hydrocephalus – A hypothesis to explain successful 3rd ventriculostomy in communicating hydrocephalus. Pediatric Neurosurg 2003; 38: 98-101
• 25 Meese W, Kluge W, Grumme T. et al. CT evaluation of the cerebrospinal fluid spaces of healthy persons. Neuroradiology 1980; 19: 131-136
• 26 Jack jr. CR, Mokri B, Laws jr. ER. et al. MR findings in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: significance and comparison with other forms of dementia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 923-931
• 27 Sherman JL, Citrin CM. Magnetic resonance demonstration of normal CSF flow. Am J Neuroradiol 1986; 7: 3-6
• 28 Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W. et al. Flow void of cerebrospinal fluid in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: can it predict outcome after shunting?. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 67-73
• 29 Bateman GA, Levi CR, Schofield P. et al. The pathophysiology of the aqueduct stroke volume in normal pressure hydrocephalus: can co-morbidity with other forms of dementia be excluded?. Neuroradiology 2005; 47: 741-748
• 30 Kahlon B, Annertz M, Stahlberg F. et al. Is aqueductal stroke volume, measured with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging scans useful in predicting outcome of shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus?. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 124-129
• 31 Dixon GR, Friedman JA, Luetmer PH. et al. Use of cerebrospinal fluid flow rates measured by phase-contrast MR to predict outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77: 509-514
• 32 Kiefer M, Unterberg A. The differential diagnosis and treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 15-26
• 33 Pomeraniec IJ, Bond AE, Lopes MB. et al. Concurrent Alzheimerʼs pathology in patients with clinical normal pressure hydrocephalus: correlation of high-volume lumbar puncture results, cortical brain biopsies, and outcomes. J Neurosurg 2016; 124: 382-388
• 34 Bech-Azeddine R, Hogh P, Juhler M. et al. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: clinical comorbidity correlated with cerebral biopsy findings and outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 157-161
• 35 Silverberg GD, Mayo M, Saul T. et al. Continuous CSF drainage in AD – Results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurology 2008; 71: 202-209
• 36 Lemcke J, Meier U, Müller C. et al. Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84: 850-857
• 37 Gölz L, Ruppert FH, Meier U. et al. Outcome of modern shunt therapy in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus 6 years postoperatively (74 % Besserung). J Neurosurg 2014; 121: 771-775
• 38 Williams MA, Sharkey P, van Doren D. et al. Influence of shunt surgery on healthcare expenditures of elderly fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 21-28
• 39 Kehler U, Langer N, Gliemroth J. et al. Reduction of shunt obstructions by using a peel-away sheath technique? A multicenter prospective randomized trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114: 381-384