Reference Curve for the Mean Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in Singleton Pregnancies

Abstract

Introduction Doppler sonography of the uterine artery (UA) is done to monitor pregnancies, because the detected flow patterns are useful to draw inferences about possible disorders of trophoblast invasion. Increased resistance in the UA is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and perinatal mortality. In the absence of standardized figures, the normal ranges of the various available reference curves sometimes differ quite substantially from one another. The causes for this are differences in the flow patterns of the UA depending on the position of the pulsed Doppler gates as well as branching of the UA. Because of the discrepancies between the different reference curves and the practical problems this poses for guideline recommendations, we thought it would be useful to create our own reference curves for Doppler measurements of the UA obtained from a singleton cohort under standardized conditions.

Material and Methods This retrospective cohort study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, the Department for Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine of the University Hospital Halle (Saale) and the Center for Prenatal Diagnostics and Human Genetics Kurfürstendamm 199. Available datasets from the three study locations were identified and reference curves were generated using the LMS method. Measured values were correlated with age of gestation, and a cubic model and Box-Cox power transformation (L), the median (M) and the coefficient of variation (S) were used to smooth the curves.

Results 103 720 Doppler examinations of the UA carried out in singleton pregnancies from the 11th week of gestation (10 + 1 GW) were analyzed. The mean pulsatility index (Mean PI) showed a continuous decline over the course of pregnancy, dropping to a plateau of around 0.84 between the 23rd and 27th GW, after which it decreased again.

Conclusion Age of gestation, placental position, position of pulsed Doppler gates and branching of the UA can all change the flow pattern. The mean pulsatility index (Mean PI) showed a continuous decrease over time. There were significant differences between our data and alternative reference curves. A system of classifying Doppler studies and a reference curve adapted to the current technology are urgently required to differentiate better between physiological and pathological findings.

Key words

preeclampsia - placenta - growth retardation - ultrasound - uterine artery - Doppler

• References/Literatur

• 1 Robertson WB, Brosens I, Dixon G. Uteroplacental vascular pathology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1975; 5: 47-65
• 2 Lin S, Shimizu I, Suehara N. et al. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in relation to trophoblast migration into the myometrium of the placental bed. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 760-765
• 3 Khong TY, De Wolf F, Robertson WB. et al. Inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and by small-for-gestational age infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 1049-1059
• 4 Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Nicolaides KH. The role of uterine artery Doppler in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18: 383-396
• 5 Poon LC, Volpe N, Muto B. et al. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of stillbirths. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 33: 28-35
• 6 Matijevic R, Johnston T. In vivo assessment of failed trophoblastic invasion of the spiral arteries in pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 78-82
• 7 Harrington K, Cooper D, Lees C. et al. Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 182-188
• 8 Entezami M, Hagen A, Albig M. Uteriner Doppler – der Messpunkt entscheidet!. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2009; 213: PO_G_01_07
• 9 Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM. et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 233-239
• 10 Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Bindra R. et al. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 441-449
• 11 Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S. et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 128-132
• 12 Cole TJ. The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards. Eur J Clin Nutr 1990; 44: 45-60
• 13 Pan H, Cole TJ. A comparison of goodness of fit tests for age-related reference ranges. Stat Med 2004; 23: 1749-1765
• 14 Dugoff L, Lynch AM, Cioffi-Ragan D. et al. First trimester uterine artery Doppler abnormalities predict subsequent intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1208-1212
• 15 Cnossen JS, Morris RK, ter Riet G. et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008; 178: 701-711
• 16 Jeffreys RM, Stepanchak W, Lopez B. et al. Uterine blood flow during supine rest and exercise after 28 weeks of gestation. BJOG 2006; 113: 1239-1247
• 17 Guedes-Martins L, Graça H, Saraiva JP. et al. The effects of spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section on uterine and umbilical arterial pulsatility indexes in normotensive and chronic hypertensive pregnant women: a prospective, longitudinal study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 1-10
• 18 Kofinas AD, Penry M, Greiss jr. FC. et al. The effect of placental location on uterine artery flow velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1504-1508
• 19 Kalanithi LE, Illuzzi JL, Nossov VB. et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and placental location. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1481-1489
• 20 Gardosi J, Giddings S, Clifford S. et al. Association between reduced stillbirth rates in England and regional uptake of accreditation training in customised fetal growth assessment. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003942