Int J Sports Med 2017; 38(10): 729-734
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-108997
Clinical Sciences
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

QTc Interval in Adolescents and Young Athletes: Influence of Correction Formulas

Salvatore Francesco Gervasi
1   Sports Medicine Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Roma, Italy
,
Massimiliano Bianco
2   Sports Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
,
Vincenzo Palmieri
1   Sports Medicine Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Roma, Italy
,
Francesco Cuccaro
1   Sports Medicine Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Roma, Italy
,
Paolo Zeppilli
2   Sports Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 04 January 2017

Publication Date:
03 August 2017 (online)

Zoom Image

Abstract

A QTc interval at the upper limits in young athletes can be challenging. Regardless of factors able to influence it (age, electrolytes, etc.), several authors underlined that rate correction formulas can often underestimate/overestimate it. Our objective was to identify the most reliable formula and relative upper normal limit of QTc for this population. The rest ECG of 701 healthy elite male athletes was analyzed. QTc was calculated with 4 formulas (Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham, Hodges). Correlation/regression analysis of QTc vs. heart rate and upper limits were calculated and compared considering different age groups. Abnormal ECGs were compared considering different upper limits. Correlation between QTc and heart rate was highly significant using Bazett’s and Framingham’s formulas, lower using Hodges’ formula, and not significant using Fridericia’s formula. Except for Framingham’s, the number of abnormal ECGs was identical considering an upper limit of 480 msec, and significantly different for lower limits. Upper limits were: Bazett 469 msec, Fridericia 451 msec, Framingham 458 msec, and Hodges 461 msec. Except for Framingham’s, no difference among other formulas in individuating abnormal ECGs for QTc≥480 msec was found. QTc obtained with the Bazett’s formula appears highly dependent on heart rate. This, especially in the grey zone (440–480 msec), can lead to overtesting. Framingham’s formula shows similar limits. Hodges’ formula offers uncertain reliability. Fridericia’s formula seems the most reliable.