Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-110863
Duty Rosters and Workloads of Obstetricians in Germany: Results of a Germany-wide Survey
Article in several languages: English | deutschPublication History
received 20 February 2017
revised 05 May 2017
accepted 09 May 2017
Publication Date:
24 August 2017 (online)

Abstract
Background Compiling a daily hospital roster which complies with existing laws and tariff regulations and meets the requirements for ongoing professional training while also taking the legal regulations on the health of employees into account makes planning the duty roster a challenge. The aim of this study was to obtain a realistic picture of existing duty roster systems and of the current workloads of obstetricians in Germany.
Method This online survey was sent to 2770 physicians training to become obstetricians or specializing in specific areas of obstetric care. The survey consisted of an anonymized 95-item questionnaire which collected data on different types of duty roster systems and the workload of obstetricians in Germany for the period from 17.02.2015 to 16.05.2015.
Results Out of a total of 2770 physicians who were contacted, 437 (16%) completed the questionnaire. Across all forms of care, the care provided outside normal working hours usually (75%) consisted of a combination of regular working times and on-call duty or even consisted entirely of standby duty. Level I perinatal centers were most likely 20% (n = 88) to have a shift system in place. Working a shift system was significantly more common in care facilities which had previously carried out a job analysis. The number of physicians in hospitals who are present during the night shift was higher in facilities with higher numbers of births and in facilities which offered higher levels of care. In addition to regularly working overtime and the fact that often not all the hours worked were recorded, it was notable that the systems used to compile duty rosters often did not comply with legal regulations or with collectively agreed working hours nor were they compatible with the staff planning requirements.
Outlook The results of this study show that the conditions of work, the working times, and the organization of working times in obstetric departments are in need of improvement. Recording the actual times worked together with an analysis of the activities performed during working times and while on standby would increase the level of transparency for employers and employees.
Key words
workload - specialization - obstetrics - work-life balance - duty roster - perinatal center-
References/Literatur
- 1 IQTIG – Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen. Welche Arten von Krankenhäusern für eine Geburt gibt es?. Online: https://www.perinatalzentren.org/ last access: 16.11.2015
- 2 Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Qualitätssicherungs-Richtlinie Früh- und Reifegeborene – QFR-RL. Online: https://www.g-ba.de/informationen/richtlinien/41/ last access: 16.11.2015
- 3 § 3 ArbZG GEREv.
- 4 SIMAP RC-J, Rechtssache C-151/02.
- 5 Bernd G. Arbeitsrecht: Bereitschaftsdienst ist Arbeitszeit. Dtsch Arztebl 2013; 39: 2
- 6 Osterloh F. Ärztestatistik: Mehr Ärztinnen, mehr Angestellte. Dtsch Arztebl 2014; 111: A672/B-580/C-560
- 7 Osterloh F. Ärztestatistik: Ärztemangel bleibt bestehen. Dtsch Arztebl 2015; 112: A-703/B-597/C-577
- 8 Gibis B, Heinz A, Jacob RD. et al. The career expectations of medical students: findings of a nationwide survey in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 327-332
- 9 Schott S, Lermann J, Eismann S. et al. Part-time employment of gynecologists and obstetricians: a sub-group analysis of a Germany-wide survey of residents. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;
- 10 Marburger Bund. MB-Monitor 2015. 2015 Online: https://www.marburger-bund.de/sites/default/files/dateien/seiten/mb-monitor-2015/gesamtauswertung-mb-monitor-2015-pk.pdf last access: 11.11.2016
- 11 § 10 Abs, 1 S. 2 TV-Ärzte VKA (Legaldefinition des Bereitschaftsdienstes).
- 12 Vicca AF. Nursing staff workload as a determinant of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus spread in an adult intensive therapy unit. J Hosp Infect 1999; 43: 109-113
- 13 Rogers AE, Hwang WT, Scott LD. et al. The working hours of hospital staff nurses and patient safety. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004; 23: 202-212
- 14 Pearlman MD. Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology: an agenda for the future. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1266-1271
- 15 Vetter C, Devore EE, Wegrzyn LR. et al. Association between rotating night shift work and risk of coronary heart disease among women. JAMA 2016; 315: 1726-1734
- 16 Puppe J, Dieterich M, Bayer C. et al. Senology in gynaecology specialist training: a baseline survey from 2014. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2016; 76: 564-569
- 17 Hancke K, Igl W, Toth B. et al. Work-life balance of German gynecologists: a web-based survey on satisfaction with work and private life. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289: 123-129
- 18 Reif P, Schott S, Boyon C. et al. Does knowledge of fetal outcome influence the interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocography and subsequent clinical management? A multicentre European study. BJOG 2016;
- 19 Knieper C, Ramsauer B, Hancke K. et al. “Pregnant and Operating”: evaluation of a Germany-wide survey among female gynaecologists and surgeons. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2014; 74: 875-880