RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-111717
Transpancreatic sphincterotomy has a higher cannulation success rate than needle-knife precut papillotomy – a meta-analysis
Publikationsverlauf
submitted 15. Januar 2017
accepted after revision 20. April 2017
Publikationsdatum:
13. Juni 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/201709/lookinside/thumbnails/15297_10-1055-s-0043-111717-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and aim While many studies have discussed the different cannulation techniques used in patients with difficult biliary access, no previous meta-analyses have compared transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) to other advanced techniques. Therefore, we aimed to identify all studies comparing the efficacy and adverse event rates of TPS with needle-knife precut papillotomy (NKPP), the most commonly used technique, and to perform a meta-analysis.
Methods The Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were searched for trials comparing the outcomes of TPS with NKPP up till December 2016. A meta-analysis focusing on outcome (cannulation success, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), post-procedural bleeding, and total adverse events) was performed. The population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) format was used to compare these cannulation approaches. Five prospective and eight retrospective studies were included in our meta-analysis.
Results NKPP has a significantly lower success rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, P = 0.046; relative risk [RR] 0.92, P = 0.03) and a higher rate of bleeding complications (OR 2.24, P = 0.02; RR 2.18, P = 0.02) than TPS. However, no significant differences were found in PEP (OR 0.79, P = 0.24; RR 0.80, P = 0.19), perforation (risk difference [RD] 0.01, P = 0.23), or total complication rates (OR 1.22, P = 0.44; RR 1.17, P = 0.47).
Conclusion While TPS has a higher success rate in difficult biliary access and causes less bleeding than NKPP, there are no differences in PEP, perforation, or total complication rates between the two approaches. We conclude that TPS, in the hands of expert endoscopists, is a safe procedure, which should be used more widely in patients with difficult biliary access.
-
References
- 1 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L. et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683
- 2 Mammen A, Haber G. Difficult biliary access: advanced cannulation and sphincterotomy technique. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015; 25: 619-630
- 3 Liao WC, Angsuwatcharakon P, Isayama H. et al. International consensus recommendations for difficult biliary access. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 295-304
- 4 Goff JS. Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter pre-cut approach to biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 642-645
- 5 Kawakami H, Kubota Y, Kawahata S. et al. Transpapillary selective bile duct cannulation technique: Review of Japanese randomized controlled trials since 2010 and an overview of clinical results in precut sphincterotomy since 2004. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 77-95
- 6 Choudhary A, Winn J, Siddique S. et al. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4093-4101
- 7 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Int Med 2009; 151: 264-269
- 8 DaVee T, Garcia JA, Baron TH. Precut sphincterotomy for selective biliary duct cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol 2012; 25: 291-302
- 9 Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12
- 10 Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D. et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 712-716
- 11 Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959; 22: 719-748
- 12 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
- 13 Higgins JPT, Green S. , eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 Available from: www.handbook.cochrane.org Accessed: 2 May 2017
- 14 Catalano MF, Linder JD, Geenen JE. Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: Comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 557-561
- 15 Espinel-Díez J, Pinedo-Ramos E, Vaquero-Ayala L. et al. Combined precut in difficult biliary cannulation. Revista Esp Enferm Dig 2013; 105: 334-337
- 16 Kim CW, Chang JH, Kim TH. et al. Sequential double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 18-24
- 17 Zang J, Zhang C, Gao J. Guidewire-assisted transpancreatic sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24: 429-433
- 18 Zou XP, Leung JW, Li YH. et al. Comparison of sequential pancreatic duct guidewire placement technique and needle knife precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation. J Dig Dis 2015; 16: 741-746
- 19 Chan CHY, Brennan FN, Zimmerman MJ. et al. Wire assisted transpancreatic septotomy, needle knife precut or both for difficult biliary access. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 1293-1297
- 20 Halttunen J, Keränen I, Udd M. et al. Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 745-749
- 21 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M. et al. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on biliary cannulation based on the characteristics of the major duodenal papilla. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1113-1118
- 22 Huang C, Kung J, Liu Y. et al. Use of double wire-guided technique and transpancreatic papillary septotomy in difficult ERCP: 4-year experience. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E1107-E1110
- 23 Kapetanos D, Kokozidis G, Christodoulou D. et al. Case series of transpancreatic septotomy as precutting technique for difficult bile duct cannulation. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 802-806
- 24 Katsinelos P, Gkagkalis S, Chatzimavroudis G. et al. Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: A retrospective analysis of 274 cases. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 3286-3292
- 25 Miao L, Li QP, Zhu MH. et al. Endoscopic transpancreatic septotomy as a precutting technique for difficult bile duct cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 3978-3982
- 26 Wang P, Zhang W, Liu F. et al. Success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife sphincterotomy for bile duct cannulation. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 697-704
- 27 Kapetanos D, Kokozidis G, Christodoulou D. et al. A randomized controlled trial of pentoxifylline for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 513-518
- 28 Kawaguchi Y, Mine T. Needle-knife sphincterotomy versus guidewire-assisted transpancreatic sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 30: 225-226
- 29 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
- 30 Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ. et al. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline - Updated June 2014. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 799-815
- 31 Tse F, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P. et al. Double-guidewire technique in difficult biliary cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 15-26
- 32 Lee YJ, Park YK, Lee MJ. et al. Different strategies for transpancreatic septotomy and needle knife infundibulotomy due to the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation in difficult biliary cannulation. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 534-539
- 33 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM. et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 381-388
- 34 Buscaglia JM, Kalloo AN. Pancreatic sphincterotomy: technique, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 4064-4071
- 35 Bakman YG, Safdar K, Freeman ML. Significant clinical implications of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in previously normal pancreatic ducts. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 1095-1098