Download PDF
Gastroenterologie up2date 2017; 13(04): 351-362
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-118091
Leber/Galle/Pankreas
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Gallengangskarzinome

Martha M. Kirstein
,
Arndt Vogel
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Gallengangskarzinome sind die zweithäufigsten malignen primären Lebertumoren nach dem hepatozellulären Karzinom. Patienten mit Gallengangskarzinomen haben eine sehr schlechte Prognose: eine 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate von unter 20% und ein medianes Gesamtüberleben von 12 – 15 Monaten [1], [2]. Dieser Beitrag fasst die Epidemiologie und die evidenzbasierten therapeutischen Optionen von Patienten mit Gallengangskarzinomen zusammen.
Kernaussagen

  • 3% aller gastrointestinalen Tumoren sind Gallengangskarzinome. 70% der Gallengangskarzinome treten sporadisch auf.

  • Darüber hinaus sind die wichtigsten Risikofaktoren in der westlichen Hemisphäre die primär sklerosierende Cholangitis und in Asien die parasitäre Infektion mit Leberegeln.

  • Risikopatienten sollten durch eine Kombination aus Bildgebung (Sonografie, MRCP, CT), Endoskopie und Biomarkern regelmäßig überwacht werden.

  • Patienten mit Gallengangskarzinomen haben eine fatale Prognose. Die einzige Therapie mit Chance auf Kuration ist die Resektion. Die Rezidivraten nach Resektion sind jedoch hoch.

  • Phase-III-Studien zeigten, dass eine adjuvante Chemotherapie das rezidivfreie Überleben und das Gesamtüberleben verlängert.

  • In der palliativen Situation ist eine Chemotherapie mit Gemcitabin und Cisplatin der Standard der Erstlinientherapie.

  • Prospektiv randomisierte Phase-III-Daten zu systemischen Zweitlinienoptionen liegen derzeit nicht vor. Auf der Basis von Phase-II- und retrospektiven Daten sowie einer Metaanalyse kann eine 5-FU-basierte Chemotherapie angeboten werden.

  • Zielgerichtete und Immuntherapien stehen aktuell im Fokus der Forschung.

Schlüsselwörter

primär sklerosierende Cholangitis - adjuvante Chemotherapie - palliative Erstlinientherapie - palliative Zweitlinientherapie - Immuntherapie
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH. et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1273-1281
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Okusaka T, Nakachi K, Fukutomi A. et al. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan. Br J Cancer 2010; 103: 469-474
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Blechacz B, Komuta M, Roskams T. et al. Clinical diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 8: 512-522
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bergquist A, von Seth E. Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 29: 221-232
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Saha SK, Zhu AX, Fuchs CS. et al. Forty-year trends in cholangiocarcinoma incidence in the U.S.: Intrahepatic disease on the rise. Oncologist 2016; 21: 594-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Tyson GL, El-Serag HB. Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2011; 54: 173-184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Erichsen R, Jepsen P, Vilstrup H. et al. Incidence and prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma in Danish patients with and without inflammatory bowel disease: a national cohort study, 1978–2003. Eur J Epidemiol 2009; 24: 513-520
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Boberg KM, Bergquist A, Mitchell S. et al. Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: risk factors and clinical presentation. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1205-1211
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Watanapa P, Watanapa WB. Liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 962-970
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Sriamporn S, Pisani P, Pipitgool V. et al. Prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection and incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand. Trop Med Int Health 2004; 9: 588-594
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sripa B, Pairojkul C. Cholangiocarcinoma: lessons from Thailand. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008; 24: 349-356
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Shaib Y, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 2004; 24: 115-125
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Gatselis NK, Tepetes K, Loukopoulos A. et al. Hepatitis B virus and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Invest 2007; 25: 55-58
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Matsumoto K, Onoyama T, Kawata S. et al. Hepatitis B and C virus infection is a risk factor for the development of cholangiocarcinoma. Intern Med 2014; 53: 651-654
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Lepage C, Cottet V, Chauvenet M. et al. Trends in the incidence and management of biliary tract cancer: a French population-based study. J Hepatol 2011; 54: 306-310
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Shaib YH, El-Serag HB, Davila JA. et al. Risk factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a case-control study. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 620-626
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Shaib YH, El-Serag HB, Nooka AK. et al. Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a hospital-based case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1016-1021
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ringe KI, Wacker F. Radiological diagnosis in cholangiocarcinoma: Application of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 29: 253-265
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Rizvi S, Gores GJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 1215-1229
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Nathan H, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. et al. A proposed staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 14-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hennedige TP, Neo WT, Venkatesh SK. Imaging of malignancies of the biliary tract – an update. Cancer Imaging 2014; 14: 14
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 DʼOnofrio M, Vecchiato F, Cantisani V. et al. Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (IPCC): comparison between perfusion ultrasound and CT imaging. Radiol Med 2008; 113: 76-86
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Guo LH, Xu HX. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Controversy over the ASSLD Guideline. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 349172
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hann LE, Greatrex KV, Bach AM. et al. Cholangiocarcinoma at the hepatic hilus: sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 985-989
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Neumaier CE, Bertolotto M, Perrone R. et al. Staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1995; 23: 173-178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Khalili K, Metser U, Wilson SR. Hilar biliary obstruction: preliminary results with Levovist-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 687-693
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Madhusudhan KS, Gamanagatti S, Gupta AK. Imaging and interventions in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a review. World J Radiol 2015; 7: 28-44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Fowler KJ, Brown JJ, Narra VR. Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions: approach to imaging diagnosis. Hepatology 2011; 54: 2227-2237
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Maccioni F, Martinelli M, Al Ansari N. et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: past, present and future: a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2010; 14: 721-725
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Zhang H, Zhu J, Ke F. et al. Radiological imaging for assessing the respectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 497942
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Liu R, Cox Rn K, Siddiqui A. et al. Peroral cholangioscopy facilitates targeted tissue acquisition in patients with suspected cholangiocarcinoma. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2014; 60: 127-133
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Tischendorf JJ, Kruger M, Trautwein C. et al. Cholangioscopic characterization of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 665-669
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Voigtlander T, Lankisch TO. Endoscopic diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: From endoscopic retrograde cholangiography to bile proteomics. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 29: 267-275
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V. et al. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 168-176
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Navaneethan U, Singh T, Gutierrez NG. et al. Predictors for detection of cancer in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture and atypical cells on endoscopic retrograde brush cytology. J Dig Dis 2014; 15: 268-275
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Enders FB, Halling KC. et al. Utility of serum tumor markers, imaging, and biliary cytology for detecting cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 2008; 48: 1106-1117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Furmanczyk PS, Grieco VS, Agoff SN. Biliary brush cytology and the detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation of specific cytomorphologic features and CA19-9 levels. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 124: 355-360
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Lankisch TO, Metzger J, Negm AA. et al. Bile proteomic profiles differentiate cholangiocarcinoma from primary sclerosing cholangitis and choledocholithiasis. Hepatology 2011; 53: 875-884
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Metzger J, Negm AA, Plentz RR. et al. Urine proteomic analysis differentiates cholangiocarcinoma from primary sclerosing cholangitis and other benign biliary disorders. Gut 2013; 62: 122-130
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Chapman R, Fevery J, Kalloo A. et al. Diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 2010; 51: 660-678
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2014; 60: 1268-1289
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Broome U, Olsson R, Loof L. et al. Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut 1996; 38: 610-615
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Melum E, Karlsen TH, Schrumpf E. et al. Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with NKG2D polymorphisms. Hepatology 2008; 47: 90-96
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Bergquist A, Glaumann H, Persson B. et al. Risk factors and clinical presentation of hepatobiliary carcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case-control study. Hepatology 1998; 27: 311-316
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Khuntikeo N, Chamadol N, Yongvanit P. et al. Cohort profile: cholangiocarcinoma screening and care program (CASCAP). BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 459
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Blechacz B, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology 2008; 48: 308-321
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Schweitzer N, Weber T, Kirstein MM. et al. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a matched pair analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2017; 143: 1347-1355
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Lamarca A, Hubner RA, David Ryder W. et al. Second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 2014; 25: 2328-2338
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Edeline J, Bonnetain F, Phelip JM. et al. Gemox versus surveillance following surgery of localized biliary tract cancer: Results of the PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18 (UNICANCER GI) phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35 (Suppl) 225 doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.225
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Primrose JN, Fox R, Palmer DH. et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for biliary tract cancer: The BILCAP randomized study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 34 (Suppl) Abstr. 4006
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Pitt HA, Nakeeb A, Abrams RA. et al. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 788-797 discussion 797–788
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Vern-Gross TZ, Shivnani AT, Chen K. et al. Survival outcomes in resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: effect of adjuvant radiotherapy in a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81: 189-198
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T. et al. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 1934-1940
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Eckel F, Schmid RM. Chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Br J Cancer 2007; 96: 896-902
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y. et al. A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2013; 71: 973-979
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Kim RD, McDonough SL, El-Khoueiry AB. et al. SWOG S1310: Randomized phase II trial of single agent MEK inhibitor trametinib vs. 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine in refractory advanced biliary cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35 (Suppl) 4016-4016
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Pape UF, Kasper S, Sinn M. et al. Randomized, multicenter phase II trial of CAP7.1 in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (Suppl) 441-441
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Lee J, Park SH, Chang HM. et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with or without erlotinib in advanced biliary-tract cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 181-188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Bekaii-Saab T, Phelps MA, Li X. et al. Multi-institutional phase II study of selumetinib in patients with metastatic biliary cancers. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2357-2363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Lowery MA, Abou-Alfa GK, Valle JW. et al. ClarIDHy: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of AG-120 vs. placebo in patients with an advanced cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35 (Suppl) TPS4142 [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Mazzaferro V, El-Rayes BF, Cotsoglou C. et al. ARQ 087, an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) with FGFR2 genetic aberrations. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35 (Suppl) 4017-4017
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar