PDF herunterladen
kleintier konkret 2017; 20(06): 2-10
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119395
hund|katze
diätetik
Enke Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Pre- und Probiotika – Wann der Einsatz bei Hund und Katze sinnvoll ist

Brigitta Wichert
Institut für Tierernährung – Vetsuisse Fakultät Universität Zürich
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
15. Dezember 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Der Einsatz von Pre- und vor allem Probiotika bei Hunden und Katzen wurde vielfach untersucht. Der Beitrag gibt eine Übersicht über die Definitionen, die rechtliche Situation und den in verschiedenen Studien untersuchte Gabe von Pre- und Probiotika. Insbesondere die Wirkungen der Pre- und Probiotika auf den Intestinaltrakt und auf das Immunsystem weisen auf vielfältige Einsatzmöglichkeiten hin.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Adogony V, Respondek F, Biourge V. et al. Effects of dietary scFOS on immunoglobulins in colostrums and milk of bitches. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2007; 91: 169-174
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Apanavicius CJ, Powell KL, Vester BM. et al. Fructan supplementation and infection affect food intake, fever, and epithelial sloughing from Salmonella challenge in weanling puppies. J Nutr 2007; 137: 1923-1930
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Baillon ML, Marshall-Jones ZV, Butterwick RF. Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus strain DSM13241 in healthy adult dogs. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 338-343
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Benyacoub J, Czarnecki-Maulden GL, Cavadini C. et al. Supplementation of food with Enterococcus faecium (SF68) stimulates immune functions in young dogs. J Nutr 2003; 133: 1158-1162
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bybee SN, Scorza AV, Lappin MR. Effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium SF68 on presence of diarrhea in cats and dogs in an animal shelter. J Vet Intern Med 2011; 25: 856-860
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Czarnecki-Maulden GL, Cavadini C, Lawler DF. et al. Incidence of naturally occurring diarrhea in kittens fed Enterococcus faecium SF68. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2007; 29 (2A): 37
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Delucchi L, Fraga M, Perelmuter K. et al. Effect of native Lactobacillus murinus LbP2 administration on total fecal IgA in healthy dogs. Can J Vet Res 2014; 78: 153-155
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization. Probiotics in food: health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 2006; 85: 1-50
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Goméz-Gallego C, Junnila J, Männikkö S. et al. A canine-specific probiotic product in treating acute or intermittent diarrhea in dogs: a double-blind placebo-controlled efficacy study. Vet Microbiol 2016; 197: 122-128
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Gonzalés-Ortiz G, Castillejos L, Mallo JJ. et al. Effects of dietary supplementation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 and Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 in adult healthy dogs. Arch Anim Nutr 2013; 67: 406-415
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Grzeskowiak L, Collado MC, Beasley S. et al. Pathogen exclusion properties of canine probiotics are influenced by the growth media and physical treatments simulating industrial processes. J Appl Microbiol 2014; 116: 1308-1314
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Grzeskowiak L, Endo A, Collado MC. et al. The effect of growth media and physical treatments on the adhesion properties of canine probiotics. J Appl Microbiol 2013; 115: 539-545
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Herstad HK, Nesheim BB, L’Abee-Lund TL. et al. Effects of a probiotic intervention in acute canine gastroenteritis – a controlled clinical trial. J Small Anim Pract 2010; 51: 34-38
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hutchins RG, Bailey CS, Jacob ME. et al. The effect of an oral probiotic containing lactobacillus, bifidobacterium, and bacillus species on the vaginal microbiota of spayed female dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2013; 27: 1368-1371
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kanasugi H, Hasegawa T, Goto Y. et al. Single administration of enterococcal preparation (FK-23) augements non-specific immune responses in healthy dogs. Int J Immunopharmac 1997; 19: 655-659
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kim H, Rather IA, Kim H. et al. A double-blind, placebo controlled-trial of a probiotic strain Lactobacillus sakei probio-65 for the prevention of canine atopic dermatitis. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2015; 25: 1966-1969
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kraehenbuhl JP, Neutra MR. Molecular and cellular basis of immune protection of mucosal surfaces. Physiol Rev 1992; 72: 853-879
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Lappin MR, Veir JK, Satyaraj E. et al. Pilot study to evaluate the effect of oral supplementation of Enterococcus faecium SF68 on cats with latent feline herpesvirus 1. J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 650-654
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 McGhee JR, Mestecky J, Dertzbaugh MT. et al. The mucosal immune system: from fundamental concepts to vaccine development. Vaccine 1992; 10: 75-88
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Manninen TJ, Rinkinen ML, Beasley SS. et al. Alteration of the canine small-intestinal lactic acid bacterium microbiota by feeding of potential probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72: 6539-6543
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Marsella R, Santoro D, Ahrens K. Early exposure to probiotics in a canine model of atopic dermatitis has long-term clinical and immunological effects. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2012; 146: 185-189
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Marshall-Jones ZV, Baillon ML, Croft JM. et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus DSM13241 as a probiotic in healthy adult cats. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1005-1012
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Martineau B, Laflamme DP. Effect of diet on markers of intestinal health in dogs. Res Vet Sci 2002; 72: 223-227
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Nakamura A, Ohnishi Y, Shirotori K. Evaluation of viability Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis LKM512 in dogs Benef Microb 2015; 6: 791-197
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Ogué-Bon E, Khoo C, McCartney AL. et al. In vitro effects of synbiontic fermentation on the canine faecal microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2010; 73: 587-600
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Pascher M, Hellweg P, Khol-Parisini A. et al. Effects of a probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus strain on feed tolerance in dogs with non-specific dietary sensitivity. Arch Anim Nutr 2008; 62: 107-116
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Pasupathy K, Sahoo A, Pathak NN. Effect of lactobacillus supplementation on growth and nutrient utilization in mongrel pups. Arch Tierernahr 2001; 55: 243-253
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Pawar MM, Pattanaik AK, Sinha DK. et al. Effect of dietary mannanoligosaccharide supplementation on nutrient digestibility, hindgut fermentation, immune response and antioxidant indices in dogs. J Anim Sci Technol 2017; 59: 11
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Rescigno M, Urbano M, Valzasina B. et al. Dendritic cells express tight junction proteins and penetrate gut epithelial monolayers to sample bacteria. Nat Immunol 2001; 2: 361-367
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Rinkinen M, Jalava K, Westermarck E. et al. Interaction between probiotic lactic acid bacteria and canine enteric pathogens: a risk factor for intestinal Enterococcus faecium colonization?. Vet Microbiol 2003; 92: 111-119
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Rose L, Rose J, Gosling S. et al. Efficacy of a probiotic-prebiotic supplement on incidence of diarrhea in a dog shelter: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Vet Intern Med 2017; 31: 377-382
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Rossi M, Corradini C, Amaretti A. et al. Fermentation of fructooligosaccharides and inulin by bifidobacteria: a comparative study of pure and fecal cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71: 6150-6158
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Saarela M, Mogensen G, Fondén R. et al. Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. J Biotechnol 2000; 84: 197-215
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sauter SN, Benyacoub J, Allenspach K. et al. Effects of probiotic bacteria in dogs with food responsive diarrhoea treated with an elimination diet. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2006; 90: 269-277
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Sauter SN, Allenspach K, Gaschen F. et al. Cytokine expression in an ex vivo culture system of duodenal samples from dogs with chronic enteropathies: modulation by probiotic bacteria. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2005; 29: 605-622
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Schrezenmeir J, de Vrese M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics – approaching a definition. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 73: 361S-364S
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Strompfová V, Pogány Simonová M, Gancarčíková S. et al. Effect of bifidobacterium animalis B/12 administration in healthy dogs. Anaerobe 2014; 28: 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Strompfová V, Marcinakova M, Simonova M. et al. Application of potential probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum AD1 strain inhealthy dogs. Anaerob 2006; 12: 75-79
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Vahjen W, Männer K. The effect of a probiotic enterococcus faecium product in diets of healthy dogs on bacteriological counts of Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp. and Clostridium spp. in faeces. Arch Tierernahr 2003; 57: 229-233
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Veir JK, Knorr R, Cavadini C. et al. Effect of supplementation with Enterococcus faecium (SF68) on immune function in cats. Vet Ther 2007; 8: 229-238
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Wynn SG. Probiotics in veterinary practice. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009; 234 (5): 606-613
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Zentek J, Marquart B, Pietrzak T. et al. Dietary effects on bifidobacteria and Clostridium perfringens in the canine intestinal tract. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2003; 87: 397-407
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Zentek J, Van der Steen I, Rohde J. et al. Dietary effects of the occurrence and enterotoxin production of Clostridium perfringens in the canine gastrointestinal tract. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 1998; 80: 250-252
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar