Download PDF
Planta Med 2018; 84(04): 225-233
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122240
Biological and Pharmacological Activity
Original Papers
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Pharmacological Foundations of Cannabis Chemovars

Mark A. Lewis
1   Napro Research, Westlake Village, CA, USA
,
Ethan B. Russo
2   International Cannabis and Cannabinoids Institute, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Kevin M. Smith
1   Napro Research, Westlake Village, CA, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 04 June 2017
revised 19 September 2017

accepted 24 October 2017

Publication Date:
21 November 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

An advanced Mendelian Cannabis breeding program has been developed utilizing chemical markers to maximize the yield of phytocannabinoids and terpenoids with the aim to improve therapeutic efficacy and safety. Cannabis is often divided into several categories based on cannabinoid content. Type I, Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-predominant, is the prevalent offering in both medical and recreational marketplaces. In recent years, the therapeutic benefits of cannabidiol have been better recognized, leading to the promotion of additional chemovars: Type II, Cannabis that contains both Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, and cannabidiol-predominant Type III Cannabis. While high-Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and high-myrcene chemovars dominate markets, these may not be optimal for patients who require distinct chemical profiles to achieve symptomatic relief. Type II Cannabis chemovars that display cannabidiol- and terpenoid-rich profiles have the potential to improve both efficacy and minimize adverse events associated with Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol exposure. Cannabis samples were analyzed for cannabinoid and terpenoid content, and analytical results are presented via PhytoFacts, a patent-pending method of graphically displaying phytocannabinoid and terpenoid content, as well as scent, taste, and subjective therapeutic effect data. Examples from the breeding program are highlighted and include Type I, II, and III Cannabis chemovars, those highly potent in terpenoids in general, or single components, for example, limonene, pinene, terpinolene, and linalool. Additionally, it is demonstrated how Type I – III chemovars have been developed with conserved terpenoid proportions. Specific chemovars may produce enhanced analgesia, anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, antidepressant, and anti-anxiety effects, while simultaneously reducing sequelae of Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol such as panic, toxic psychosis, and short-term memory impairment.

Key words

Cannabis sativa - Cannabaceae - marijuana - cannabinoid - tetrahydrocannabinol - cannabidiol - terpenoids

Supporting Information

    PhytoFacts comparisons of Type I, II, and III chemovars with preservation of the limonene-predominant and caryophyllene-predominant terpenoid profiles and proportions are available as Supporting Information.

  • Supporting Information
 

  • References

  • 1 Fuchs L. The great Herbal of Leonhart Fuchs: De Historia stirpium commentarii Insignes, 1542 (notable Commentaries on the History of Plants). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Linnaeus C. Species plantarum. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii; 1753
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lamarck JB. Encyclopédie méthodique botanique. Paris: Chez Panckoucke; 1783
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Piomelli D, Russo EB. The Cannabis sativa versus Cannabis indica debate: An Interview with Ethan Russo, MD. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2016; 1: 44-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Schultes R, Klein W, Plowman T, Lockwood T. Cannabis: an example of taxonomic neglect. Bot Mus Leafl Harv Univ 1974; 23: 337-367
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Small E, Cronquist A. A practical and natural taxonomy for Cannabis . Taxon 1976; 25: 405-435
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Clarke RC, Merlin MD. Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Usher G. The Wordsmith Dictionary of Botany. Ware, Herfordshire: Wordsworth Reference; 1996
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Brickell CD, Alexander C, David JC, Hetterscheid WLA, Leslie AC, Malecot V, Jin X. International Code of Nomenclature for cultivated Plants, 8th ed. Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Horticultural Science; 2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bailey LH, Bailey EZ. Hortus third: a concise Dictionary of Plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1976
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Small E. Cannabis: a complete Guide. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2017
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hillig KW. A chemotaxonomic analysis of terpenoid variation in Cannabis . Biochem Syst Ecol 2004; 32: 875-891
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Elzinga S, Fischedick J, Podkolinski R, Raber JC. Cannabinoid and terpenes as chemotaxonomic markers in cannabis. Nat Prod Chem Res 2015; 3: 1-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Buchbauer G, Jirovetz L, Jager W, Plank C, Dietrich H. Fragrance compounds and essential oils with sedative effects upon inhalation. J Pharm Sci 1993; 82: 660-664
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Potter DJ. The propagation, characterisation and optimisation of Cannabis sativa L. as a phytopharmaceutical [Doctoral Thesis]. London: Kingʼs College; 2009: 224
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hazekamp A, Tejkalova K, Papadimitriou S. Cannabis: from cultivar to chemovar II – a metabolomics approach to cannabis classification. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2016; 1: 202-215
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Russo EB. Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. Br J Pharmacol 2011; 163: 1344-1364
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 McPartland JM, Russo EB. Non-phytocannabinoid Constituents of Cannabis and herbal Synergy. In: Pertwee RG. ed. Handbook of Cannabis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2014: 280-295
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Russo EB, Marcu J. Cannabis Pharmacology: The usual suspects and a few promising leads. Adv Pharmacol 2017; 80: 67-134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Russo EB. Current therapeutic cannabis controversies and clinical trial design issues. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7: 309
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Giese MW, Lewis MA, Giese L, Smith KM. Development and validation of a reliable and robust method for the analysis of cannabinoids and terpenes in cannabis. J AOAC Int 2015; 98: 1503-1522
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Fischedick J. Identification of terpenoid chemotypes among high (−)-trans-delta nine-tetrahydrocannabinol-producing Cannabis sativa L. cultivars. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2017; 2: 34-47
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Booth JK, Page JE, Bohlmann J. Terpene synthases from Cannabis sativa . PLoS One 2017; 12: e0173911
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Wilkinson JD, Whalley BJ, Baker D, Pryce G, Constanti A, Gibbons S, Williamson EM. Medicinal cannabis: is delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol necessary for all its effects?. J Pharm Pharmacol 2003; 55: 1687-1694
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Williamson EM. Synergy and other interactions in phytomedicines. Phytomedicine 2001; 8: 401-409
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 McPartland JM, Russo EB. Cannabis and cannabis extracts: Greater than the sum of their parts?. J Cannabis Ther 2001; 1: 103-132
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Ben-Shabat S, Fride E, Sheskin T, Tamiri T, Rhee MH, Vogel Z, Bisogno T, De Petrocellis L, Di Marzo V, Mechoulam R. An entourage effect: inactive endogenous fatty acid glycerol esters enhance 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol cannabinoid activity. Eur J Pharmacol 1998; 353: 23-31
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Russo E, Guy GW. A tale of two cannabinoids: the therapeutic rationale for combining tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. Med Hypotheses 2006; 66: 234-246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Whittle BA, Guy GW, Robson P. Prospects for new cannabis-based prescription medicines. J Cannabis Ther 2001; 1: 183-205
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Gallily R, Yekhtin Z, Hanus L. Overcoming the bell-shaped dose-response of cannabidiol by using cannabis extract enriched in cannabidiol. Pharmacol Pharm 2014; 6: 75-85
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Johnson JR, Burnell-Nugent M, Lossignol D, Ganae-Motan ED, Potts R, Fallon MT. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of THC : CBD extract and THC extract in patients with intractable cancer-related pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010; 39: 167-179
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Brodie JS, Di Marzo V, Guy GW. Polypharmacology shakes hands with complex aetiopathology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2015; 36: 802-821
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 do Vale TG, Furtado EC, Santos jr. JG, Viana GS. Central effects of citral, myrcene and limonene, constituents of essential oil chemotypes from Lippia alba (Mill.) n.e. Brown. Phytomedicine 2002; 9: 709-714
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Perry NS, Houghton PJ, Theobald A, Jenner P, Perry EK. In-vitro inhibition of human erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase by Salvia lavandulaefolia essential oil and constituent terpenes. J Pharm Pharmacol 2000; 52: 895-902
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Volicer L, Stelly M, Morris J, McLaughlin J, Volicer BJ. Effects of dronabinol on anorexia and disturbed behavior in patients with Alzheimerʼs disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997; 12: 913-919
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Hasselmo ME. The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006; 16: 710-715
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Borgwardt SJ, Allen P, Bhattacharyya S, Fusar-Poli P, Crippa JA, Seal ML, Fraccaro V, Atakan Z, Martin-Santos R, OʼCarroll C, Rubia K, McGuire PK. Neural basis of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol: effects during response inhibition. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 64: 966-973
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Naqvi NH, Bechara A. The insula and drug addiction: an interoceptive view of pleasure, urges, and decision-making. Brain Struct Funct 2010; 214: 435-450
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Xi ZX, Peng XQ, Li X, Song R, Zhang HY, Liu QR, Yang HJ, Bi GH, Li J, Gardner EL. Brain cannabinoid CB(2) receptors modulate cocaineʼs actions in mice. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14: 1160-1166
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Gertsch J, Leonti M, Raduner S, Racz I, Chen JZ, Xie XQ, Altmann KH, Karsak M, Zimmer A. Beta-caryophyllene is a dietary cannabinoid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 9099-9104
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Ito K, Ito M. The sedative effect of inhaled terpinolene in mice and its structure-activity relationships. J Nat Med 2013; 67: 833-837
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Russo EB. The pharmacological History of Cannabis. In: Pertwee R. ed. Handbook of Cannabinoids. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014: 23-43
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 43 Russo EB. Cannabis and epilepsy: An ancient treatment returns to the fore. Epilepsy Behav 2017; 70: 292-297
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Sulak D, Saneto R, Goldstein B. The current status of artisanal cannabis for the treatment of epilepsy in the United States. Epilepsy Behav 2017; 70: 328-333
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Gofshteyn JS, Wilfong A, Devinsky O, Bluvstein J, Charuta J, Ciliberto MA, Laux L, Marsh ED. Cannabidiol as a potential treatment for Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES) in the acute and chronic phases. J Child Neurol 2017; 32: 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Walsh Z, Gonzalez R, Crosby K, Thiessen MS, Carroll C, Bonn-Miller MO. Medical cannabis and mental health: A guided systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2017; 51: 15-29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Bergamaschi MM, Queiroz RH, Chagas MH, de Oliveira DC, De Martinis BS, Kapczinski F, Quevedo J, Roesler R, Schroder N, Nardi AE, Martin-Santos R, Hallak JE, Zuardi AW, Crippa JA. Cannabidiol reduces the anxiety induced by simulated public speaking in treatment-naive social phobia patients. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011; 36: 1219-1226
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Komori T, Fujiwara R, Tanida M, Nomura J, Yokoyama MM. Effects of citrus fragrance on immune function and depressive states. Neuroimmunomodulation 1995; 2: 174-180
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Chen A. Some of the parts: is marijuanaʼs “entourage effect” scientifically valid? Available at. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/some-of-the-parts-is-marijuana-rsquo-s-ldquo-entourage-effect-rdquo-scientifically-valid/ Accessed April 20, 2017
    PubMed
  • 50 Russo EB. Cannabidiol claims and misconceptions. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2017; 38: 198-201
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar