Download PDF
Z Gastroenterol 2018; 56(04): 361-364
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-123882
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Screening interval recommendations following a normal colonoscopy in individuals with a familial risk of colorectal cancer

Empfehlungen zum Screening-Intervall nach unauffälliger Koloskopie bei Personen mit familiärem Risiko für Darmkrebs
Jasper Plath
1   Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
2   German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
3   German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany
,
Andrea Siebenhofer
1   Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
4   Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
,
Corina Guethlin
1   Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
,
Irina Blumenstein
5   University Clinic Frankfurt, Department of Gastroenterology, Frankfurt, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 July 2017

22 November 2017

Publication Date:
16 January 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background In view of the increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals with affected first-degree relatives (FDRs), the German evidence-based S3 guideline recommends having the first screening colonoscopy early and then, following a normal examination, repeating it at least every 10 years. The aim of this analysis was to explore colonoscopy interval recommendations in clinical practice among individuals aged < 55 years with a familial risk of CRC.

Methods We analyzed data from the FRIDA.Frankfurt study. Patients aged 40 – 54 years with at least 1 reported FDR with CRC (excluding suspected/known hereditary cancer syndromes) and a normal colonoscopy result (no findings) were included. Data on colonoscopist recommendations for intervals between subsequent colonoscopies were extracted from colonoscopy reports.

Results Of 63 reports of normal colonoscopies, 20 (32 %) did not include a recommendation on when to undergo a further colonoscopy. Of 43 reports with recommendations, 40 (93 %) suggested an interval that was shorter than the recommended maximum interval in the guideline: 1 (2 %) was for a 3-year interval, 37 (86 %) were for 5-year intervals, and 2 (5 %) were for 8-year intervals.

Conclusions Although the low number of cases limits generalizability, the results indicate that recommended intervals in clinical practice are considerably shorter than the recommended maximum interval in the guideline.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Unter Berücksichtigung des erhöhten Risikos für kolorektale Karzinome (KRK) bei Personen mit von einem KRK betroffenen Angehörigen ersten Grades wird in der deutschen S-3 Leitlinie eine frühe Durchführung der ersten Koloskopie und bei unauffälligem Befund eine Kontrolle mindestens alle 10 Jahre empfohlen. Ziel dieser Untersuchung war die Analyse von Empfehlungen aus der klinischen Praxis zum Intervall der Früherkennungskoloskopie, die für Personen unter 55 Jahren mit familiärem Risiko ausgesprochen wurden.

Methode Analyse von Daten der Studie FRIDA.Frankfurt: Personen im Alter von 40 bis 54 Jahren mit mindestens einem Angehörigen ersten Grades mit KRK und unauffälliger Koloskopie wurden eingeschlossen. Personen mit Verdacht auf oder bekanntem hereditären Syndrom wurden ausgeschlossen. Angaben zu empfohlenen Intervallen zur nächsten Koloskopie wurden aus Koloskopieberichten extrahiert.

Ergebnisse Von 63 Berichten zu unauffälligen Koloskopien enthielten 20 (32 %) keine Empfehlung zum Zeitpunkt der nächsten Koloskopie. Von 43 Berichten mit Empfehlung enthielten 40 (93 %) eine Empfehlung für ein kürzeres Intervall als das in der Leitlinie genannte maximale Intervall: Ein Bericht (2 %) enthielt die Empfehlung 3 Jahre, 37 (86 %) die Empfehlung 5 Jahre und 2 (5 %) die Empfehlung 8 Jahre bis zur nächsten Koloskopie.

Schlussfolgerung Obwohl die geringe Zahl der Fälle die Generalisierbarkeit limitiert, weisen die Ergebnisse darauf hin, dass die empfohlenen Intervalle in der Praxis deutlich kürzer sind als das empfohlene maximale Intervall der Leitlinie.

Key words

colorectal neoplasms - familial risk - colonoscopy - surveillance - screening

Schlüsselwörter

Kolorektales Karzinom - familiäres Risiko - Koloskopie - Kontrolle - Screening
 

  • References

  • 1 Butterworth AS, Higgins JP, Pharoah P. Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 216-227
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Plath J, Siebenhofer A, Koné I. et al. Frequency of a positive family history of colorectal cancer in general practice: a cross-sectional study. Fam Pract 2017; 34: 30-35
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 German Guideline Program in Oncology [German Cancer Society, German Cancer Aid, AWMF]. Evidenced-Based Guideline for Colorectal Cancer, long version 1.1, AWMF registration number: 021-007OL. Available at http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/021-007OL.html Accessed on April 18, 2017
    PubMed
  • 4 Johnson MR, Grubber J, Grambow SC. et al. Physician non-adherence to colonoscopy interval guidelines in the veterans affairs healthcare system. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 938-951
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Lin OS, Gluck M, Nguyen M. et al. Screening patterns in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer often do not adhere to national guidelines. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 1841-1848
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gupta AK, Samadder J, Elliott E. et al. Prevalence of any size adenomas and advanced adenomas in 40- to 49-year-old individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy because of a family history of colorectal carcinoma in a first-degree relative. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 110-118
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Krist AH, Jones RM, Woolf SH. et al. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists’ recommendation. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33: 471-478
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Siebenhofer A, Plath J, Taubenroth M. et al. Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA. Frankfurt]: study protocol of a cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 605
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Guideline of the Federal Joint Committee on early detection of cancer diseases: as amended on June 6, 2009. Available at https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-1292/KFE-RL_2016-04-21_iK-2017-01-01_AT-08-07-2016-B2.pdf Accessed on April 18, 2017
    PubMed
  • 10 Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ. et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012 1st ed.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Yabroff KR, Klabunde CN, Yuan G. et al. Are physicians’ recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent?. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26: 177-184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Bampton PA, Sandford JJ, Young GP. Applying evidence-based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasia. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 155-157
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Plath J, Siebenhofer A, Haug U. et al. Utilization of colonoscopy and colonoscopic findings among individuals aged 40–54 years with a positive family history of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017 Jul 7 [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMed
  • 15 Haug U, Rösch T, Hoffmeister M. et al. Implementing an organised colorectal cancer screening programme in Germany: opportunities and challenges. Gesundheitswesen 2015; 77: 869-874
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar