CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78(03): 283-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124518
GebFra Science
Letter to the Editor
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

mTor Inhibitors for the Treatment of Endometriosis

mTOR-Inhibitoren zur Behandlung von Endometriose
Fabio Barra
1   Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
2   Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
,
Simone Ferrero
1   Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
2   Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
21. März 2018 (online)

We read with great interest the article of Kacan et al. entitled “Everolimus as an mTOR Inhibitor Suppresses Endometriotic Implants: an Experimental Rat Study” [1] published in your journal.

The authors surgically induced endometriosis by the autotransplantation of uterine tissue in the peritoneal cavity of 24 rats. The animals were randomized in three groups, receiving oral everolimus, oral anastrozole, or intravenous saline solution for 14 days. Histological evaluation was done by the endometriosis score (according to Keenan et al. [2]) and immunohistochemical examination was performed by using antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CD117 and BAX. The post-treatment analysis of endometriotic implants revealed that anastrozole and everolimus succeeded in significantly decreasing their growth and size with no difference in histological and immunohistochemical results between the two drugs. The authors noted at histology that the number of ovarian follicles was not negatively altered by everolimus, differently from anastrozole that, as evidenced in literature, tends to decrease it [3].