Imaging of the Diabetic Foot

Abstract

Diabetic foot complications are increasingly prevalent in the world, leading to significant morbidity and driving up associated health care costs. Complex pathophysiology and suboptimal specificity of current imaging modalities have made diagnosis challenging, mainly in the evaluation of superimposed foot infection to underlying arthropathy or other marrow lesions. Recent advances in radiology and nuclear medicine have the potential to streamline the assessment of diabetic foot complications. But we must be aware of the specific strengths and weaknesses of each modality, and their applications. This review offers a comprehensive approach to the spectrum of diabetic foot complications and their imaging appearances in conventional and advanced imaging studies, including optimal technical considerations for each technique. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are highlighted, illustrating their complementary role to conventional MRI, in particular their potential impact in avoiding additional studies.

Keywords

diabetic foot - infection - Charcot's neuroarthropathy - bone diseases - imaging

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. Mai 2023

• References

• 1 Zhang Y, Lazzarini PA, McPhail SM, van Netten JJ, Armstrong DG, Pacella RE. Global disability burdens of diabetes-related lower-extremity complications in 1990 and 2016. Diabetes Care 2020; 43 (05) 964-974
• 2 Peterson N, Widnall J, Evans P, Jackson G, Platt S. Diagnostic imaging of diabetic foot disorders. Foot Ankle Int 2017; 38 (01) 86-95
• 3 Alavi A, Sibbald RG, Mayer D. et al. Diabetic foot ulcers: Part I. Pathophysiology and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70 (01) 1.e1-1.e18 ; quiz 19–20
• 4 Lipsky BA, Senneville É, Abbas ZG. et al; International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020; 36 (Suppl (Suppl. 01) e3280
• 5 IDF Diabetes Atlas.. 10th ed. Available at: Accessed September 2022. https://diabetesatlas.org/
• 6 Bus SA, Lavery LA, Monteiro-Soares M. et al; International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020; 36 (Suppl (Suppl. 01) e3269
• 7 Vartanians VM, Karchmer AW, Giurini JM, Rosenthal DI. Is there a role for imaging in the management of patients with diabetic foot?. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38 (07) 633-636
• 8 Hochman MG, Cheung Y, Brophy DP, Parker JA. . Imaging of the diabetic foot. In: Veves A, Giurini JM, Logerfo FW, eds. The Diabetic Foot. Contemporary Diabetes. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2006:227–253
• 9 Baker JC, Demertzis JL, Rhodes NG, Wessell DE, Rubin DA. Diabetic musculoskeletal complications and their imaging mimics. Radiographics 2012; 32 (07) 1959-1974
• 10 Donovan A, Schweitzer ME. Use of MR imaging in diagnosing diabetes-related pedal osteomyelitis. Radiographics 2010; 30 (03) 723-736
• 11 Cohen M, Cerniglia B, Gorbachova T, Horrow J. Added value of MRI to X-ray in guiding the extent of surgical resection in diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis: a review of pathologically proven, surgically treated cases. Skeletal Radiol 2019; 48 (03) 405-411
• 12 Rosskopf AB, Loupatatzis C, Pfirrmann CWA, Böni T, Berli MC. The Charcot foot: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2019; 10 (01) 77
• 13 Chatha DS, Cunningham PM, Schweitzer ME. MR imaging of the diabetic foot: diagnostic challenges. Radiol Clin North Am 2005; 43 (04) 747-759 , ix
• 14 Komarraju A, Chhabra A. . Advanced cross-sectional radiology-ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the diabetic foot. In: Boulton AJM, Rayman G, Wukich DK, eds. The Foot in Diabetes. Somerset, NJ: Wiley; 2020:169–185
• 15 Schweitzer ME, Daffner RH, Weissman BN. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria on suspected osteomyelitis in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5 (08) 881-886
• 16 Weinreb JC, Rodby RA, Yee J. et al. Use of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media in patients with kidney disease: Consensus statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. Radiology 2021; 298 (01) 28-35
• 17 Omoumi P. The Dixon method in musculoskeletal MRI: from fat-sensitive to fat-specific imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51 (07) 1365-1369
• 18 Ergen FB, Sanverdi SE, Oznur A. Charcot foot in diabetes and an update on imaging. Diabet Foot Ankle 2013; 4
• 19 Schoots IG, Slim FJ, Busch-Westbroek TE, Maas M. Neuro-osteoarthropathy of the foot-radiologist: friend or foe?. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010; 14 (03) 365-376
• 20 Martín Noguerol T, Luna Alcalá A, Beltrán LS, Gómez Cabrera M, Broncano Cabrero J, Vilanova JC. Advanced MR imaging techniques for differentiation of neuropathic arthropathy and osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Radiographics 2017; 37 (04) 1161-1180
• 21 Kumar Y, Khaleel M, Boothe E, Awdeh H, Wadhwa V, Chhabra A. Role of diffusion weighted imaging in musculoskeletal infections: current perspectives. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (01) 414-423
• 22 Diez AIG, Fuster D, Morata L. et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy in diabetic foot. Eur J Radiol 2020; 132: 109299
• 23 Desai S, Wadhwa V, Thakur U, Chhabra A. Role of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in diabetic foot and ankle disease. Biomed J Sci Tech Res 2021; 39 (03) 31325-31336
• 24 Liao D, Xie L, Han Y. et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating osteomyelitis from acute neuropathic arthropathy in the complicated diabetic foot. Skeletal Radiol 2018; 47 (10) 1337-1347
• 25 Cavallo AU, Koktzoglou I, Edelman RR. et al. Noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12 (05) e008844
• 26 Hinchliffe RJ, Forsythe RO, Apelqvist J. et al; International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020; 36 (01, Suppl Suppl 1): e3276
• 27 Thakkar RS, Del Grande F, Thawait GK, Andreisek G, Carrino JA, Chhabra A. Spectrum of high-resolution MRI findings in diabetic neuropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (02) 407-412
• 28 Lipsky BA, Aragón-Sánchez J, Diggle M. et al; International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016; 32 (Suppl (Suppl. 01) 45-74
• 29 Commean PK, Kennedy JA, Bahow KA. et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography measurement precision for volumes and densities of tarsal and metatarsal bones. J Clin Densitom 2011; 14 (03) 313-320
• 30 Sanverdi SE, Ergen BF, Oznur A. Current challenges in imaging of the diabetic foot. Diabet Foot Ankle 2012; 3
• 31 Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D. et al. Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part VI, foot and ankle. Eur Radiol 2022; 32 (02) 1384-1394
• 32 Llewellyn A, Kraft J, Holton C, Harden M, Simmonds M. Imaging for detection of osteomyelitis in people with diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2020; 131: 109215
• 33 Lauri C, Glaudemans AWJM, Campagna G. et al. Comparison of white blood cell scintigraphy, FDG PET/CT and MRI in suspected diabetic foot infection: results of a large retrospective multicenter study. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (06) 1645
• 34 Iyengar KP, Jain VK, Awadalla Mohamed MK, Vaishya R, Vinjamuri S. Update on functional imaging in the evaluation of diabetic foot infection. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 16: 119-124
• 35 Leone A, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Semprini A, Tonetti L, Magarelli N, Colosimo C. Neuropathic osteoarthropathy with and without superimposed osteomyelitis in patients with a diabetic foot. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45 (06) 735-754
• 36 Lauri C, Tamminga M, Glaudemans AWJM. et al. Detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot by imaging techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MRI, white blood cell scintigraphy, and FDG-PET. Diabetes Care 2017; 40 (08) 1111-1120
• 37 Rubitschung K, Sherwood A, Crisologo AP. et al. Pathophysiology and molecular imaging of diabetic foot infections. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22 (21) 11552
• 38 Casali M, Lauri C, Altini C. et al. State of the art of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT application in inflammation and infection: a guide for image acquisition and interpretation. Clin Transl Imaging 2021; 9 (04) 299-339
• 39 Polvoy I, Flavell RR, Rosenberg OS, Ohliger MA, Wilson DM. Nuclear imaging of bacterial infection: the state of the art and future directions. J Nucl Med 2020; 61 (12) 1708-1716
• 40 Peters EJG, Lipsky BA. Diagnosis and management of infection in the diabetic foot. Med Clin North Am 2013; 97 (05) 911-946
• 41 Ledermann HP, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME. MR image analysis of pedal osteomyelitis: distribution, patterns of spread, and frequency of associated ulceration and septic arthritis. Radiology 2002; 223 (03) 747-755
• 42 Hingorani A, LaMuraglia GM, Henke P. et al. The management of diabetic foot: a clinical practice guideline by the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63 (02, Suppl): 3S-21S
• 43 Donovan A, Schweitzer ME. Current concepts in imaging diabetic pedal osteomyelitis. Radiol Clin North Am 2008; 46 (06) 1105-1124 , vii
• 44 Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Batte WG, Radack DP, Russel KM. Osteomyelitis of the foot: relative importance of primary and secondary MR imaging signs. Radiology 1998; 207 (03) 625-632
• 45 Lauri C, Leone A, Cavallini M, Signore A, Giurato L, Uccioli L. Diabetic foot infections: the diagnostic challenges. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (06) 1-20
• 46 Harish S, Chiavaras MM, Kotnis N, Rebello R. MR imaging of skeletal soft tissue infection: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting abscess formation. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40 (03) 285-294
• 47 Ledermann HP, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB. Nonenhancing tissue on MR imaging of pedal infection: characterization of necrotic tissue and associated limitations for diagnosis of osteomyelitis and abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178 (01) 215-222
• 48 Hayeri MR, Ziai P, Shehata ML, Teytelboym OM, Huang BK. Soft-tissue infections and their imaging mimics: from cellulitis to necrotizing fasciitis. Radiographics 2016; 36 (06) 1888-1910
• 49 Park JK, Kim BS, Choi G, Kim SH, Lee KB, Khang H. Distinction of reactive joint fluid from pyogenic abscess by diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25 (04) 859-861
• 50 Karchevsky M, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Parellada JA. MRI findings of septic arthritis and associated osteomyelitis in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (01) 119-122
• 51 Wukich DK, Sung W. Charcot arthropathy of the foot and ankle: modern concepts and management review. J Diabetes Complications 2009; 23 (06) 409-426
• 52 Sella EJ, Barrette C. Staging of Charcot neuroarthropathy along the medial column of the foot in the diabetic patient. J Foot Ankle Surg 1999; 38 (01) 34-40
• 53 Rogers LC, Frykberg RG, Armstrong DG. et al. The Charcot foot in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34 (09) 2123-2129
• 54 Chantelau EA, Grützner G. Is the Eichenholtz classification still valid for the diabetic Charcot foot?. Swiss Med Wkly 2014; 144: w13948
• 55 Daneshvar K, Anwander H. Diagnostic imaging of diabetic foot disorders. Foot Ankle Clin 2022; 27 (03) 513-527
• 56 Hastings MK, Johnson JE, Strube MJ. et al. Progression of foot deformity in Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (13) 1206-1213
• 57 Vaeggemose M, Pham M, Ringgaard S. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging MR neurography for the detection of polyneuropathy in type 1 diabetes. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 45 (04) 1125-1134
• 58 Ahluwalia R, Bilal A, Petrova N. et al. The role of bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT in the characterization and early diagnosis of stage 0 Charcot neuroarthropathy. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (12) 4123
• 59 Ruotolo V, Di Pietro B, Giurato L. et al. A new natural history of Charcot foot: clinical evolution and final outcome of stage 0 Charcot neuroarthropathy in a tertiary referral diabetic foot clinic. Clin Nucl Med 2013; 38 (07) 506-509
• 60 Raj S, Prakash M, Rastogi A, Sinha A, Sandhu MS. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report. Pol J Radiol 2022; 87 (01) e274-e280
• 61 Abdel Razek AAK, Samir S. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation of diabetic osteoarthropathy and osteomyelitis in diabetic foot. Eur J Radiol 2017; 89: 221-225
• 62 Lipsky BA. Treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis primarily with surgery or antibiotics: have we answered the question?. Diabetes Care 2014; 37 (03) 593-595
• 63 Sofka CM. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the foot and ankle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37 (03) 556-565