Nuklearmedizin 2023; 62(02): 120
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1766250
Abstracts | NuklearMedizin 2023
WIS-Vortrag
PET Onkologie

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for imaging of FAP expressing cancer – a single-center prospective interventional single-arm clinical trial: study protocol and initial results

W. P. Fendler
1   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
T. Bartel
1   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
K. Pabst
1   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
N. Hirmas
1   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
B. Schaarschmidt
2   Essen
,
H. Grafe
1   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
C. Praus
2   Essen
,
M. Nader
1   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
L. Podleska
2   Essen
,
F. Barbato
1   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
J. Siveke
2   Essen
,
K. Herrmann
1   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
R. Hamacher
2   Essen
,
V. Grünwald
2   Essen
› Author Affiliations
 

Ziel/Aim The fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is highly expressed on cells of the tumor or the tumor associated microenvironment and thus is an interesting target for imaging and therapy. Here we assess the diagnostic value of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for various tumor entities.

Methodik/Methods This is a single-center prospective interventional non-randomized single-arm clinical phase 2 trial (NCT05160051). We will enroll n=155 patients to undergo 68Ga-FAPI-46 and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Key inclusion criteria are: (a) proven or suspected malignant tumor, (b) imaging at initial staging or re-staging of disease, (c) at least one detectable tumor lesion with any diameter>1 cm, (d) intended or performed surgery or biopsy of tumor within 8 weeks before or after enrolment. Primary endpoint is the positive predictive value on a per-region- and per-patient-basis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for detection of tumor. Key secondary endpoints were (a) association between 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET uptake intensity and histopathologic FAP expression, (b) accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI-46 versus 18F-FDG PET, (c) impact on management, (d) inter-reader reproducibility, (e) safety, (f) change in staging/prognostic groups.

Ergebnisse/Results At submission, in total n=91 of 155 (59%) patients have been enrolled and n=88 underwent PET. Five most common tumor types were renal cell cancer (n=18/88, 20%), sarcoma (n=17/88, 19%), lung cancer (n=8/88, 9%), lymphoma (n=9/88, 10%), and PDAC (n=7/88, 8%). Patients were referred for initial staging (n=57/88, 65%) or re-staging (n=31/88, 35%) of disease. On clinical reads, any tumor was detected on 68Ga-FAPI-46 versus 18F-FDG PET in n=88/88 (100%) versus 86/88 (98%) patients. Average SUVmax for 68Ga-FAPI-46 versus 18F-FDG PET was 14.4 versus 15.2. Histopathology, follow-up and blinded reader assessments are pending.

Schlussfolgerungen/Conclusions This prospective interventional non-randomized single-arm clinical phase 2 trial was designed to assess the diagnostic value of 68Ga-FAPI-46 versus 18F-FDG PET, impact on management, and inter-reader reproducibility for various types of tumor. Findings may support regulatory approval and identification of candidates for radioligand therapy.



Publication History

Article published online:
30 March 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany