Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767671
Biomechanics of Proximal Hamate Autograft in Scaphoid Nonunion
Abstract
Purpose Treatment of proximal scaphoid fractures remains a challenge with a risk of nonunions and avascular necrosis due to its retrograde blood supply. The ipsilateral proximal hamate has been described as a viable autograft option for osteochondral reconstruction of the proximal scaphoid. Our study evaluated the changes in the contact area and pressure of the radioscaphoid joint after proximal hamate autograft reconstruction.
Methods Thin sensors (Tekscan Inc., Boston, MA) were placed in the radiocarpal joints of six fresh-frozen cadaveric forearms. Each specimen's tendons were loaded to 150 N in neutral, 45-degree flexion/extension positions through five cycles. Through a dorsal wrist approach, the proximal 10 mm of the scaphoid and hamate was excised. The proximal hamate autograft was affixed to the scaphoid with K-wires. Peak contact pressures and areas at the scaphoid facet were determined and averaged across loading cycles.
Results At the radioscaphoid facet, peak contact pressures were equivalent, although an increasing trend in the neutral and extended wrist position was seen. At the radiolunate facet, contact pressure had an increasing trend in the hamate reconstructed wrists in all wrist positions. Contact areas had a decreasing trend and were nonequivalent at the radioscaphoid facet in the hamate reconstructed wrist.
Conclusion After hamate autograft, the contact areas were not equivalent between the native and reconstructed wrists but contact pressures were equivalent in the facets. The proximal hamate has a more pointed morphology compared with the proximal scaphoid, which would explain the change in contact area in the hamate autografted wrist. Our study suggests hamate autograft may present a viable reconstruction for the proximal pole of the scaphoid without significantly altering peak contact pressures at the radioscaphoid facet.
Statement of Ethics
This study does not contain any human participants and does not have any requisite institutional review board.
Publication History
Received: 28 August 2022
Accepted: 20 February 2023
Article published online:
13 April 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Cooney III WP, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Nonunion of the scaphoid: analysis of the results from bone grafting. J Hand Surg Am 1980; 5 (04) 343-354
- 2 Gelberman RH, Menon J. The vascularity of the scaphoid bone. J Hand Surg Am 1980; 5 (05) 508-513
- 3 Ruby LK, Stinson J, Belsky MR. The natural history of scaphoid non-union. A review of fifty-five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (03) 428-432
- 4 Kerluke L, McCabe SJ. Nonunion of the scaphoid: a critical analysis of recent natural history studies. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (01) 1-3
- 5 Zaidemberg C, Siebert JW, Angrigiani C. A new vascularized bone graft for scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (03) 474-478
- 6 Boyer MI, von Schroeder HP, Axelrod TS. Scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis of the proximal pole. Treatment with a vascularized bone graft from the dorsum of the distal radius. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998; 23 (05) 686-690
- 7 Larson AN, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Dorsal distal radius vascularized pedicled bone grafts for scaphoid nonunions. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006; 10 (04) 212-223
- 8 Bürger HK, Windhofer C, Gaggl AJ, Higgins JP. Vascularized medial femoral trochlea osteocartilaginous flap reconstruction of proximal pole scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (04) 690-700
- 9 Merrell GA, Wolfe SW, Slade III JF. Treatment of scaphoid nonunions: quantitative meta-analysis of the literature. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (04) 685-691
- 10 Chang MA, Bishop AT, Moran SL, Shin AY. The outcomes and complications of 1,2-intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone grafting of scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (03) 387-396
- 11 Veitch S, Blake SM, David H. Proximal scaphoid rib graft arthroplasty. J Bone J Surg Ser B 2007; 89 (02) 196-201
- 12 Yao J, Read B, Hentz VR. The fragmented proximal pole scaphoid nonunion treated with rib autograft: case series and review of the literature. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (11) 2188-2192
- 13 Elhassan B, Noureldin M, Kakar S. Proximal scaphoid pole reconstruction utilizing ipsilateral proximal hamate autograft. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11 (04) 495-499
- 14 Wu K, Padmore C, Lalone E, Suh N. An anthropometric assessment of the proximal hamate autograft for scaphoid proximal pole reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (01) 60.e1-60.e8
- 15 Kakar S, Greene RM, Elhassan BT, Holmes III DR. Topographical analysis of the hamate for proximal pole scaphoid nonunion reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (01) 69.e1-69.e7
- 16 Thayer MK, Bluth B, Huang JI. A morphometric analysis of hamate autograft for proximal scaphoid reconstruction. J Wrist Surg 2021; 10 (03) 268-271
- 17 Peters SJ, Verstappen C, Degreef I, Smet LD. Avascular necrosis of the hamate: three cases and review of the literature. J Wrist Surg 2014; 3 (04) 269-274
- 18 Tang P, Gauvin J, Muriuki M, Pfaeffle JH, Imbriglia JE, Goitz RJ. Comparison of the “contact biomechanics” of the intact and proximal row carpectomy wrist. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (04) 660-670
- 19 Zhu YL, Xu YQ, Ding J, Li J, Chen B, Ouyang YF. Biomechanics of the wrist after proximal row carpectomy in cadavers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2010; 35 (01) 43-45
- 20 Dodds SD, Halim A. Scaphoid plate fixation and volar carpal artery vascularized bone graft for recalcitrant scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (07) e191-e198
- 21 Pet MA, Assi PE, Yousaf IS, Giladi AM, Higgins JP. Outcomes of the medial femoral trochlea osteochondral free flap for proximal scaphoid reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (04) 317-326.e3
- 22 Chen YR, Wu YF, Tang JB, Giddins G. Contact areas of the scaphoid and lunate with the distal radius in neutral and extension: correlation of falling strategies and distal radial anatomy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39 (04) 379-383