RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767682
The Prevalence of Confidential Content in Adolescent Progress Notes Prior to the 21st Century Cures Act Information Blocking Mandate
Abstract
Background The 21st Century Cures Act information blocking final rule mandated the immediate and electronic release of health care data in 2020. There is anecdotal concern that a significant amount of information is documented in notes that would breach adolescent confidentiality if released electronically to a guardian.
Objectives The purpose of this study was to quantify the prevalence of confidential information, based on California laws, within progress notes for adolescent patients that would be released electronically and assess differences in prevalence across patient demographics.
Methods This is a single-center retrospective chart review of outpatient progress notes written between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, at a large suburban academic pediatric network. Notes were labeled into one of three confidential domains by five expert reviewers trained on a rubric defining confidential information for adolescents derived from California state law. Participants included a random sampling of eligible patients aged 12 to 17 years old at the time of note creation. Secondary analysis included prevalence of confidentiality across age, gender, language spoken, and patient race.
Results Of 1,200 manually reviewed notes, 255 notes (21.3%) (95% confidence interval: 19–24%) contained confidential information. There was a similar distribution among gender and age and a majority of English speaking (83.9%) and white or Caucasian patients (41.2%) in the cohort. Confidential information was more likely to be found in notes for females (p < 0.05) as well as for English-speaking patients (p < 0.05). Older patients had a higher probability of notes containing confidential information (p < 0.05).
Conclusion This study demonstrates that there is a significant risk to breach adolescent confidentiality if historical progress notes are released electronically to proxies without further review or redaction. With increased sharing of health care data, there is a need to protect the privacy of the adolescents and prevent potential breaches of confidentiality.
Keywords
adolescent medicine - confidentiality - 21st Century Cures Act - information blocking - clinical documentation - communicationProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, and was determined nonhuman subjects research by Stanford University Institutional Review Board.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 12. Januar 2022
Angenommen: 16. Februar 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. Mai 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 OpenNotes. Accessed January 28, 2022 at: https://www.opennotes.org
- 2 Bialostozky M, Huang JS, Kuelbs CL. Are you in or are you out? Provider note sharing in pediatrics. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 166-171
- 3 Tripathi M, Steven P. A new day for interoperability – the information blocking regulations start now. Health IT Buzz, 8 Apr. 2021. Accessed March 3, 2023 at: www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/information-blocking/a-new-day-for-interoperability-the-information-blocking-regulations-start-now
- 4 Walker J, Leveille S, Bell S. et al. OpenNotes after 7 years: patient experiences with ongoing access to their clinicians' outpatient visit notes. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (05) e13876 Erratum in: J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 30;22(4):e18639. PMID: 31066717; PMCID: PMC6526690
- 5 Ip W, Yang S, Parker J. et al. Assessment of prevalence of adolescent patient portal account access by guardians. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (09) e2124733
- 6 Pageler NM, Webber EC, Lund DP. Implications of the 21st Century Cures Act in Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2021; 147 (03) e2020034199
- 7 Wyckoff A. AAP endorses statement raising awareness of teen confidentiality issues in Cures Act. American Academy of Pediatrics, April 6, 2021. Accessed March 3, 2023 at: https://www.aappublications.org/news/2021/04/06/cures-act-teen-confidentiality-endorsement-040621
- 8 Common Program Requirements - Acgme.org. Accessed February 19, 2022 at: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/320_pediatrics_2021v2.pdf
- 9 Alderman EM, Breuner CC. COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE. Unique needs of the adolescent. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (06) e20193150
- 10 Committee on Adolescence, Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Screening for nonviral sexually transmitted infections in adolescents and young adults. Pediatrics 2014; 134 (01) e302-e311
- 11 Hagan JFSJ, Duncan PM. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 4th ed. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017
- 12 O'Sullivan LF, McKee MD, Rubin SE, Campos G. Primary care providers' reports of time alone and the provision of sexual health services to urban adolescent patients: results of a prospective card study. J Adolesc Health 2010; 47 (01) 110-112
- 13 Pampati S, Liddon N, Dittus PJ, Adkins SH, Steiner RJ. Confidentiality matters but how do we improve implementation in adolescent sexual and reproductive health care?. J Adolesc Health 2019; 65 (03) 315-322
- 14 Ford CA, Millstein SG, Halpern-Felsher BL, Irwin Jr CE. Influence of physician confidentiality assurances on adolescents' willingness to disclose information and seek future health care. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278 (12) 1029-1034
- 15 Ginsburg KR, Slap GB, Cnaan A, Forke CM, Balsley CM, Rouselle DM. Adolescents' perceptions of factors affecting their decisions to seek health care. JAMA 1995; 273 (24) 1913-1918
- 16 Lindberg C, Lewis-Spruill C, Crownover R. Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care: urban male adolescents speak out. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 2006; 29 (02) 73-88
- 17 Lothen-Kline C, Howard DE, Hamburger EK, Worrell KD, Boekeloo BO. Truth and consequences: ethics, confidentiality, and disclosure in adolescent longitudinal prevention research. J Adolesc Health 2003; 33 (05) 385-394
- 18 Carlson J, Goldstein R, Hoover K, Tyson N. NASPAG/SAHM statement: The 21st Century Cures act and adolescent confidentiality. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2021; 34 (01) 3-5
- 19 English A, Ford CA. Adolescent consent and confidentiality: complexities in context of the 21st Century Cures Act. Pediatrics 2022; 149 (06) e2022056414
- 20 Schapiro NA, Mihaly LK. The 21st Century Cures Act and challenges to adolescent confidentiality. J Pediatr Health Care 2021; 35 (04) 439-442
- 21 Parsons CR, Hron JD, Bourgeois F. Use of a confidential note type in adolescent outpatient clinic visits. Pediatrics 2018; 142 (1_MeetingAbstract): 635
- 22 Guttmacher Institute. An Overview of consent to reproductive health services by Young People. Accessed January 28, 2022 at: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-minors-consent-law
- 23 Sharko M, Jameson R, Ancker JS, Krams L, Webber EC, Rosenbloom ST. State-by-state variability in adolescent privacy laws. Pediatrics 2022; 149 (06) e2021053458
- 24 State Minor Consent Laws: A Summary. 3rd ed. Page 7. Accessed March 3, 2023 at: https://www.freelists.org/archives/hilac/02-2014/pdftRo8tw89mb.pdf
- 25 Duplessis V, Goldstein S, Newlan S. Understanding Confidentiality and Minor Consent in California: A Module of Adolescent Provider Toolkit. 2nd ed. Oakland, CL: Adolescent Health Working Group, California Adolescent Health Collaborative; 2010
- 26 Sharko M, Wilcox L, Hong MK, Ancker JS. Variability in adolescent portal privacy features: how the unique privacy needs of the adolescent patient create a complex decision-making process. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (08) 1008-1017
- 27 Bedgood M, Kuelbs CL, Jones VG, Pageler N. Organizational perspectives on technical capabilities and barriers related to pediatric data sharing and confidentiality. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (07) e2219692
- 28 Beltran-Aroca CM, Girela-Lopez E, Collazo-Chao E, Montero-Pérez-Barquero M, Muñoz-Villanueva MC. Confidentiality breaches in clinical practice: what happens in hospitals?. BMC Med Ethics 2016; 17 (01) 52
- 29 Parsons CR, Hron JD, Bourgeois FC. Preserving privacy for pediatric patients and families: use of confidential note types in pediatric ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (11) 1705-1710
- 30 Naing L, Nordin RB, Abdul Rahman H, Naing YT. Sample size calculation for prevalence studies using Scalex and ScalaR calculators. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22 (01) 209
- 31 Kubo T, Kamura J, Yasufumi T, Liang X. Text Annotation Tool for Human'. Accessed March 3, 2023 at: https://github.com/doccano/doccano
- 32 Lewis Gilbert A, McCord AL, Ouyang F. et al. Characteristics associated with confidential consultation for adolescents in primary care. J Pediatr 2018; 199: 79.e1-84.e1
- 33 Fahimi J, Aurrecoechea A, Anderson E, Herring A, Alter H. Substance abuse and mental health visits among adolescents presenting to US emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care 2015; 31 (05) 331-338
- 34 Forrow L, Kontrimas JC. Language barriers, informed consent, and effective caregiving. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32 (08) 855-857
- 35 Murugan A, Gooding H, Greenbaum J. et al. Lessons learned from OpenNotes learning mode and subsequent implementation across a pediatric health system. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (01) 113-122
- 36 Cures Act Final Rule Information Blocking Exceptions. HealthIT.gov. Accessed June 14, 2022 at: https://www.healthit.gov/cures/sites/default/files/cures/2020-03/InformationBlockingExceptions.pdf