Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e1606-e1612
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768068
Original Article

Accuracy of Wireless Pulse Oximeter on Preterm or <2.5 kg Infants

Micaela Thomas#
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Heather Day#
2   Department of Statistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
3   Department of Data Science and Fireware, Owlet Baby Care Inc., Lehi, Utah
,
Brandy Petersen
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Trisha Marchant
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Cory Jones
3   Department of Data Science and Fireware, Owlet Baby Care Inc., Lehi, Utah
,
4   Division of Neonatology, Loma Linda School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California
5   Departments of Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Belinda Chan
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was sponsored by an Owlet investigator-initiated research grant. The Owlet Baby Care provided the devices. Authors did not receive any separate forms of payment to produce the manuscript.

Abstract

Objective Monitoring heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) in infants is essential in the neonatal intensive care unit. Wireless pulse oximeter technology has been advancing but with limited accuracy data on preterm infants. This observational study compared HR and SpO2 of the wireless Owlet Smart Sock 3 (OSS3) to the wired Masimo SET (Masimo) pulse oximeter in preterm or <2.5 kg infants.

Study Design Twenty-eight eligible infants were enrolled. They weighed between 1.7 and 2.5 kg and were without anomalies or medical instability. OSS3 and Masimo simultaneously monitored HR and SpO2 for 60 minutes. The data were aligned by time epoch and filtered for poor tracings. The agreement was compared using the Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Bland–Altman method, average root mean square (ARMS), and prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) analyses.

Results Two infants' data were excluded due to motion artifacts or device failures. The corrected gestational age and current weights were 35 ± 3 weeks and 2.0 ± 0.2 kg (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. Over 21 hours of data showed that HR was strongly correlated between the two devices (r = 0.98, p < 0.001), with a difference of −1.3 beats per minute (bpm) and the limit of agreement (LOA) −6.3 to 3.4 bpm based on the Bland–Altman method. SpO2 was positively correlated between the two devices (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) with a SpO2 bias of 0.3% (LOA: −4.6 to 4.5%). The estimated ARMS of OSS3 compared with Masimo was 2.3% for SpO2 in the 70 to 100% range. The precision decreased with lower SpO2. A strong agreement (PABAK = 0.94) was between the two devices on whether SpO2 was above or below 90%.

Conclusion OSS3 provided comparable HR and SpO2 accuracy to Masimo in preterm or <2.5 kg infants. Motion artifacts, lack of arterial blood gas comparisons, and lack of racial and ethnic diversity are the study limitations. More OSS3 data on the Lower HR and SpO2 ranges were needed before implementing inpatient use.

Key Points

  • Pulse oximeters are vital for monitoring preterm infants' HR and SpO2 levels.

  • Limited data exist on the accuracy of the wireless OSS3 on preterm infants.

  • This observational study found that the OSS3 is comparable to the Masimo SET in measuring HR and SpO2 in preterm or <2.5 kg infants.

Authors' Contributions

M.T., H.D., and B.C. contributed to the conception and design of the study, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation; B.P. and T.M. contributed to the parental consent process and data collection; C.J. contributed to the data processing; Y.S. contributed to the manuscript preparation and review. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


# Heather Day and Micaela Thomas are co-first authors.




Publication History

Received: 02 September 2022

Accepted: 06 March 2023

Article published online:
18 April 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA